ronpaulforprez2008
10-09-2008, 12:27 PM
Now, before I make the following post I want to reassert my commitment to small Gov't that does not interfere with market forces, especially by leveraging fiat money to bailout certain preferred Parties. However, given the mess that we are in, created in a large part by a debt based monetary system and socialized Gov't, I actually think something positive could come out of McCain's latest economic sound-bites:
The Politics and Policy of McCain's New Mortgage Proposal (http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/stumper/archive/2008/10/08/the-politics-and-policy-of-mccain-s-new-mortgage-proposal.aspx)
From what I hear, McCain's announced a plan for dealing with the crash that sounded a lot like what LaRouche has been suggesting. Namely, he's talking about re-invoking the depression era homeowners protection act and separating out saving real assets and dumping bogus ("illiquid") assets.
If this is accurate, then I see these as very positive steps in the short term. It keeps people from being dislocated out of their homes, which should make it easier for them to remain productive and actually pay-back those loans. Secondly, it helps exhaust the bad debt from the system without entangling savings, which is what is happening right now as high-risk investment banks are buying up solid consumer banks loaded with people's savings, putting even more people at risk.
Now, while I'm not interested in being extorted at the of a gun to bailout high-risk homeowners, I would think there is a way to structure this deal as debt so that the Gov't can recoup its principle with an interest rate hopefully close to CPI.
This ain't perfect, that's for sure, and it sure isn't Ron's way of moving forward, but it sure as heck beats the Obama-nation Globalist plan.
The Politics and Policy of McCain's New Mortgage Proposal (http://blog.newsweek.com/blogs/stumper/archive/2008/10/08/the-politics-and-policy-of-mccain-s-new-mortgage-proposal.aspx)
From what I hear, McCain's announced a plan for dealing with the crash that sounded a lot like what LaRouche has been suggesting. Namely, he's talking about re-invoking the depression era homeowners protection act and separating out saving real assets and dumping bogus ("illiquid") assets.
If this is accurate, then I see these as very positive steps in the short term. It keeps people from being dislocated out of their homes, which should make it easier for them to remain productive and actually pay-back those loans. Secondly, it helps exhaust the bad debt from the system without entangling savings, which is what is happening right now as high-risk investment banks are buying up solid consumer banks loaded with people's savings, putting even more people at risk.
Now, while I'm not interested in being extorted at the of a gun to bailout high-risk homeowners, I would think there is a way to structure this deal as debt so that the Gov't can recoup its principle with an interest rate hopefully close to CPI.
This ain't perfect, that's for sure, and it sure isn't Ron's way of moving forward, but it sure as heck beats the Obama-nation Globalist plan.