PDA

View Full Version : THE MONEY MASTERS producer email today




raystone
10-01-2008, 04:08 PM
From the Producer of THE MONEY MASTERS


October 1, 2008

Urgent Letter re the $700 Billion Bank Bailout

Dear Fellow American Citizen:

The ongoing, severe economic turmoil in our nation - destined to get worse if the right remedy is not enacted - was predicted in our video The Money Masters as the inevitable result of our fractional reserve banking system.

Our banking system, established by the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, works essentially like a spring. When the Central Bank, the Federal Reserve, wishes to create new money, it simply does so. There are no reserves to our money. The Fed then spends this money, usually to buy Treasury Bonds from private owners of the bonds (more recently to bailout or help huge banks buyout failing banks), which the sellers had purchased from the Treasury Department. These bonds (and Treasury bills, TIPS and notes) were initially sold to the public to fund government deficits. In our metaphor the money created by the Fed is the spring. The spring gets stretched in the following manner.

Banks, privately-owned, are permitted to loan out 90% of this new Fed-created money once it is deposited by the sellers of the bonds. That would not be a problem, except for the fact that the borrowers almost always redeposit the money (or the people they pay with their loan proceeds do). Once re-deposited, the banks can lend it out again. This re-loan, redeposit, re-loan, redeposit, etc. scheme, authorized by the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, allows banks each time to retain just 10% of the re-deposited loan proceeds as a reserve, ultimately allowing banks to lend out 9 times the original amount deposited, and to charge interest on it as many times as it was loaned. So instead of an interest rate of, for example, 6%, the banks may be collectively receiving a total of 54% interest per year (6% x 9; usually it is somewhat less due to the lack of qualified borrowers). Now you know, if have not already seen The Money Masters, why banks grow and prosper much more than other businesses, that is, until they have stretched the spring to the maximum.

Once the economy is flooded with the bank-created money 9 times in excess of the money originally created by the Fed, an expansion that increases the money supply, which reduces the purchasing power of already-existing money (including wages and savings), interest rates begin to drop (as there is more money to lend) and prices rise (inflation). The dollar begins to fall relative to the money of other countries not in this same stage of money expansion. Money begins to flow out of US Treasury bonds (due to lower interest rates and the lessening purchasing power of the dollar due to inflation). Thus ends the expansionary or "boom" part of this artificial "business cycle." To combat rising inflation and the falling dollar, the Fed begins raising interest rates.

Then the spring of the economy - the money supply - having been stretched to the maximum, begins its contraction, usually initiated by rising interest rates reaching a point that begins to inhibit borrowing and also inflation. The economic "bust" part of the cycle begins. Loans dwindle as interest rates rise and credit terms tighten. Various segments of the economy, accustomed to easy credit, begin to contract due to higher interest rates; loans become harder to get. Home prices fall, businesses begin to fail, bankruptcy's increase. This "bust" part of the cycle continues, and worsens, until inflation is "tamed," prices stabilize, and the dollar rises relative to other currencies. Eventually, the higher interest rates begin to attract foreign money, and the Treasury then is able to borrow what it needs at lower and lower interest rates. Interest rates fall. The artificial cycle then begins anew.

This boom-bust economic cycle is totally unnecessary and is the fundamental cause of the inherent instability in our economy. It is due to too-rapid increases in the money supply due to deficit spending and then the multiplier effect of fractional reserve banking (described above) and to lenders greedy to take advantage of such a system that rewards lending with more and more interest revenue; followed by a too-rapid contraction of the money supply (such as we are experiencing now), necessary to combat the inflationary effects of the former phase, both the direct result of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913. We urgently need to reform this system that rewards greed and results in ever-increasing swings from boom-to-bust - destroying ordinary businesses and farms in the process. We need to repeal or fundamentally reform the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, and to replace it with a system that eliminates the ability of private banks to "create" and multiply money as loans.

The major banks of this country - the ones the government is lending your money to, and from which the Bailout Bill proposes to buy their bad assets (wouldn't you too like the opportunity to sell off your bad investments to the government!), are busily swallowing up the banks in trouble in this latest bust - one deeper because of more rapid prior monetary expansion and inflation. As after all prior bust cycles, they will emerge larger and more powerful, and fewer. Wealth will be even more concentrated under their control, which they will use in the next bust to further this process, until eventually no one will own anything but the ability to borrow - to go deeper into debt to banks than their neighbors. Not savings, but credit scores will determine the average American's ability to engage in economic activity (such as buying a home or car). No one will dare breathe a word against such power, concentrated in very few hands, and our republic will end with a whimper.

Our Congress struggles with ignorance of the complex, bank-created system enacted in 1913. It struggles with the money the bank PACs flood into the political system to defeat their critics and elect their shills. It struggles with mass media owned or controlled by the banks, which seek to stir up panic in the populace, to stampede Congress into bank-developed "solutions" that only make the fundamental problems worse and increase their wealth. Based on history, the banks will not fail to see-saw the economy and the markets to match their strategies for fooling the public, and putting pressure on the Congress to do their will. But we must resist. We must hold out for genuine reform - for repeal or fundamental reform of the Federal Reserve Act of 1913.

Here is a hyperlink to one such reform proposal, the Monetary Reform Act. It is not the only possible reform, but it is one developed, in its essentials, over many years by numerous monetary reformers including the late Nobel Laureate, Dr. Milton Friedman. Any genuine reform of our monetary system must include two basic elements: fractional reserve lending (such as described above) must be prohibited, and private banks must be forbidden from creating money, whether as loans or otherwise. The Monetary Reform Act does both. It also incorporates means of doing this that include paying off the huge national debt, and stabilizing the economy.

We have not previously written the viewers of The Money Masters. We judged the time was not ripe. But increasingly we are being asked - urgently - what can we do, and when, to be effective. Now it is clearly urgent that we flood Congress with our calls, emails and letters, to oppose the proposed taxpayer-funded Bailout of the banks. Rather, we support genuine reform, that will not result in an even greater concentration of economic power in fewer and fewer hands. We support the Monetary Reform Act, or any such Act that repeals or reforms the Federal Reserve Act so as to prohibit fractional reserve banking and money creation (as loans or otherwise) by private banks. We oppose the Bailout of the banks. We want genuine, fundamental reform, now!

Very truly yours,

Patrick S.J. Carmack

Patrick S.J. Carmack, J.D.
Producer of The Money Masters
themoneymasters.com



The Two Step Plan to National Economic Reform and Recovery


1. Directs the Treasury Department to issue U.S. Notes (exactly like Lincoln's Greenbacks) to pay off the National debt.

2. Increases the reserve ratio private banks are required to maintain from 10% to 100%, thereby terminating their ability to create money, while simultaneously absorbing the funds created to retire the national debt.

These two relatively simple steps, which Congress has the power to enact, would extinguish the national debt, without inflation or deflation, and end the unjust practice of private banks creating money as loans (i.e., fractional reserve banking). Paying off the national debt would wipe out the $400+ billion annual interest payments and thereby balance the budget. This Act would stabilize the economy and end the boom-bust economic cycles caused by fractional reserve banking. For the full text of the Act click here to read the MONETARY REFORM ACT.


Support the Monetary Reform Act - contact your Congressman today!

Pete
10-01-2008, 04:38 PM
Wow, is all I can say. Five stars from me.

TruthAtLast
10-01-2008, 05:39 PM
i got this email too. I ordered about 15 copies last year.

forsmant
10-01-2008, 05:48 PM
This is an outstanding letter!

s35wf
10-01-2008, 06:11 PM
and this is what we all must do is concentrate on abolishing the Federal Reserve!

H Roark
10-01-2008, 09:59 PM
Any talks of a new version of Money Masters? Perhaps shorter and up-to-date.

dr. hfn
10-01-2008, 10:04 PM
bump!

Deborah K
10-01-2008, 10:07 PM
I sent this to Glenn Beck. He really needs to interview Ed Griffin!

Alawn
10-01-2008, 11:19 PM
I sent this to Glenn Beck. He really needs to interview Ed Griffin!

Well Griffin doesn't agree with the Money Masters people. Both want to get rid of the fed. Griffin wants a gold or silver backed currency with no fractional reserve banking. The money masters guys want a 100% fiat currency run by congress with no fractional reserve banking and strict rules on how much they can print. The money masters people actually believe gold backing is horrible.

In my opinion Griffin's way > The Money Masters way > what we have now.

OferNave
10-02-2008, 12:30 AM
Well Griffin doesn't agree with the Money Masters people. Both want to get rid of the fed. Griffin wants a gold or silver backed currency with no fractional reserve banking. The money masters guys want a 100% fiat currency run by congress with no fractional reserve banking and strict rules on how much they can print. The money masters people actually believe gold backing is horrible.

In my opinion Griffin's way > The Money Masters way > what we have now.

Well stated. That captures how I feel about it as well.

The MM guy is deluded by Milton Friedman's camp into thinking a Fiat money system can work if run by a wise Congress, like Ben Franklin did for a few years pre-war. He's wrong both on the economics and on the politics of power.

I still give the DVD out to people though, because the first three hours is solid awesomeness on the history of banking.

humanic
10-02-2008, 12:51 AM
In his article How Collectivists Create Their Own Opposition and How Not To Be Fooled By It (http://www.wiseupjournal.com/?p=191), G. Edward Griffin writes:


The Money Masters is a video documentary based upon a 1998 book by the same title written by Bill Still. It is an excellent production with sound history and professionally created images. It tells the story of our debauched money system in an entertaining and convincing manner. There is just one problem with it. It offers a false solution – which is to say that it offers no solution at all. The alleged solution is that we should abandon our present fiat money system and adopt another one very much like it. Yes, it advocates fiat money! The proposal is that we should take the power to create money-out-of-nothing away from those big, bad bankers and turn it over to those nice, trustworthy politicians where, supposedly, it will be used for the benefit of “the people.” It is naïve to think that politicians are any more trustworthy than bankers. It is equally naïve to think that, because politicians are elected, they will protect the people they represent. The reality of present-day “democracy” is that politicians serve special interests with financial clout, not voters. With enough money, votes can be purchased through media exposure. Politicians with the largest campaign budgets are almost always the winners. Turning over control of the Fed to the politicians would change nothing but the outward appearance. The solution is not to politicize the Federal Reserve. It is to abolish it.

The problem with money created out of nothing is not who does it but that it is done at all. The solution to fiat money is not more fiat money. It is real money based on tangible assets, and none has yet been discovered that serves as well as gold or silver. The assertion in The Money Masters that wooden sticks were successfully used in England as money is grossly misleading. Tally sticks were occasionally used like government-issued script that could be applied to the payment of taxes, but at no time in history were they ever used as a medium of exchange for substantial economic transactions. To propose that we now can live with fiat money based on that myth is a non-solution that is irrational and dishonest.

In this regard, Money Masters is like William Greider's book, Secrets of the Temple, which was offered to the public in 1987 as a scathing exposé of the Federal Reserve System. Greider’s history was excellent, but his conclusion was fatally flawed. After having proved that the Fed was conceived as a weapon of the banking elite against the common man and having shown that this is exactly the function it has always served, his conclusion was, not to abolish the Fed or even to make serious changes to it. His “call to action” was simply to stop worrying about it. The Fed has made mistakes, he said, but we have learned many lessons along the way. All we need now are wiser men to run it! That is exactly the kind of powder-puff solution that made his book acceptable to the giant publishing house, Simon and Schuster. It is no solution at all. The elite do not care what we know about a problem if we don't do anything about it. They're quite good at putting forth their own opposition – writers like Greider – who will sound the alarm and rally the troops but lead them exactly nowhere.

In 1999, Liberty International Entertainment released a made-for-TV documentary entitled The Monopoly Men that echoed a similar message. That’s not surprising inasmuch as Bill Still was one of the writers and also appeared as an on camera expert. The program contains a great deal of accurate and hard-hitting history showing that the Federal Reserve, through its power to create fiat money, has operated virtually as a conspiracy against the American people. The solution? More fiat money, of course – only this time it should be under the management of politicians, not bankers.

I strongly recommend reading the entire article by clicking the link above.

Bruno
10-02-2008, 01:31 AM
In his article How Collectivists Create Their Own Opposition and How Not To Be Fooled By It (http://www.wiseupjournal.com/?p=191), G. Edward Griffin writes:



I strongly recommend reading the entire article by clicking the link above.

I am in awe of this man's depth of knowledge on the Fed. I'm about a 100 pages into The Creature from Jekyll Island.

Thanks for sharing the article.

Joe3113
10-02-2008, 01:58 AM
You people do realize that the Money Masters producers have said the Mises Institute and Austrian School is a conspiracy so that when the current system collapses, everyone will go to the gold standard and the bankers will still rule the roost. They think the gold standard is a false solution put forward by the bankers themselves because the bankers have all the gold stored away such that they can manipulate any gold standard that would potentially come in as a solution to the current fiat problems.

Go back and listen to the interview Alex Jones did with them a few months back. I don't have the file but that is exactly what they said.

I think the answer is have money be whatever people want it to be. That way if they try to manipulate gold it won't work. Perhaps oil companies could issue notes backed by oil. Perhaps other commodity stores could be used as backing. The problem with that is how do you calculate taxes. But, of course, we don't want any taxes on income and sales do we.

HOLLYWOOD
10-02-2008, 02:01 AM
It's:


$850 BILLION as of the BILL the Senate PASSED.

and going up from there!

it's no longer $700 Billion

who know's tomorrow? :rolleyes:

DFF
10-02-2008, 04:10 AM
That's an amazingly informative letter. If everybody in our country read and understood that piece, there would probably be a revolt tomorrow.

Pete
10-02-2008, 06:27 AM
The basic idea of issuing new money to pay off the debt, with 100% reserve requirements, is the key. A further refinement would be for the new money to be backed by gold and silver (or BE gold and silver).

OTOH, maybe this was to be the scenario for introducing the Amero. :eek:

lisajames96
10-02-2008, 07:05 AM
The basic idea of issuing new money to pay off the debt, with 100% reserve requirements, is the key. A further refinement would be for the new money to be backed by gold and silver (or BE gold and silver).

OTOH, maybe this was to be the scenario for introducing the Amero. :eek:

This whole thread is very new/interesting to me, so excuse my ignorance. But how do we issue new money to pay off debt without creating more debt? Do the Money Masters creators have a solution to stop the govt from borrowing the money from banks to create it? I favor a gold/silver backed dollar, but I could see how a fiat dollar that was not created by debt and resticted to no fractional reserve use might work to...

Deborah K
10-02-2008, 08:03 AM
Well Griffin doesn't agree with the Money Masters people. Both want to get rid of the fed. Griffin wants a gold or silver backed currency with no fractional reserve banking. The money masters guys want a 100% fiat currency run by congress with no fractional reserve banking and strict rules on how much they can print. The money masters people actually believe gold backing is horrible.

In my opinion Griffin's way > The Money Masters way > what we have now.

I understand that they have different solutions but they both want to get rid of the Federal Reserve and that is THE starting point as far as I am concerned. Ed presents himself really well and I think he is the one who should inform the sleeping about the Fed. Glenn gave us an opening a couple weeks ago when he told his audience that the Fed was private.

I really like Pat and Bill. I've had much correspondence with both in the past, and have spoken with Bill on the phone a few times. I'm no economics expert so I'm not sure about the best way to solve the problem, but I will say that backing money with hard assets that aren't exclusive to gold and silver seems preferable over a fiat system and fractional reserve banking should end completely.