The Federal Income Tax Officially DIED today (3/27/2007) at 13:53:58 PDT

[speech]

Someone was saying hang them with their own rope?


Yes: this news is significant for all 300 million Americans,
particularly as the annual April 15 tax deadline approaches.

There is no liability STATUTE for taxes imposed by subtitle A
of the Internal Revenue Code: IRS tried to create that liability
with regulations instead, but it's not legal for IRS to do that:

THE IRS CREATED THE INCOME TAX LIABILITY, NOT CONGRESS!

An administrative regulation is NOT an "Act of Congress":

US CODE: Title 1,101. Enacting clause (defines "Act of Congress")

Regulations are written and promulgated by Executive Branch agencies,
NOT by the Congress of the United States i.e. the Legislative Branch.
Only the Congress can "make federal laws":

Supreme Law Library : Reference : White House Constitution : whuscons

EVEN IF IRS were a de jure service or bureau within
the U.S. Department of the Treasury (which they are not),
they would STILL not have any authority to create a tax liability
by means of regulations published in the Federal Register.

So, in point of fact, IRS has been impersonating the Congress
and impersonating the U.S. Department of the Treasury.
These are violations of 18 USC 912 and 31 USC 333,
respectively:

US CODE: Title 18,912. Officer or employee of the United States (felony federal offense)
US CODE: Title 31,333. Prohibition of misuse of Department of the Treasury names, symbols, etc. (civil and criminal penalties)

And, since Treasury fell silent in response to a proper and lawful
SUBPOENA IN A CIVIL CASE, they were legally estopped
the moment we filed a NOTICE OF DEFAULT, BY AFFIDAVIT
at the Tenth Circuit today. Service of LEGAL MAIL is effected
on the day it's posted.

"Estoppel" basically means that they cannot come
forward any longer, because they had their chance,
for several years, and they couldn't produce a STATUTE.

So, now it's O-V-E-R for them.
http://waronyou.com/forums/index.php?topic=1091.msg3059;topicseen#msg3059

[fedup100]

They are way above any law out there, even their own. The outcome of an individual taking this demonic arm of the money changers on will almost always result in the "ed brown effect"

Now that the fed resv. has been handed all control of the usa, you can expect swarms of these IRS agents to ascend on you and me and our neighbors.

[erika]

They are way above any law out there, even their own. The outcome of an individual taking this demonic arm of the money changers on will almost always result in the "ed brown effect"

Now that the fed resv. has been handed all control of the usa, you can expect swarms of these IRS agents to ascend on you and me and our neighbors.

Fuck them. You have a right to defend yourself. Get your whole neighborhood informed on their scam.

[fedup100]

Fuck them. You have a right to defend yourself. Get your whole neighborhood informed and involved in their scam.

That is what the actor James Garner did and they slithered away. But seriously folks, they will kill you dead.

[Danke]

Revenue Act of 1862

Revenue Act of 1864

Revenue Act of 1865

Revenue Act of 1867

Revenue Act of 1870

Revenue Act of 1872

Revenue Act of 1873 (Revised Statutes)

Revenue Act of 1878

Revenue Act of 1894

Corporate Excise Tax Act of 1909

Federal Reserve Act

Revenue Act of 1913

Revenue Act of 1916

Revenue Act of 1917

Revenue Act of 1919

Revenue Act of 1921

Classification Act of 1923

Revenue Act of 1924

Revenue Act of 1926

Revenue Act of 1928

Index To The Federal Statutes 1874 - 1931

Revenue Act of 1932

Revenue Act of 1934

Revenue Act of 1935

Social Security Act of 1935

Revenue Act of 1936

Revenue Act of 1938

The IRC of 1939

Appendix to the IRC of 1939
The 'Preliminary Materials' chapter in the 1986 IRC contains a dual cross-reference table, first indexing 1939 code sections to the 1986 code, then indexing 1986 sections to the 1939 sections from which they are drawn. Once having identified the 1939 section in which you are interested, find the section listing in the 1939 appendix, where the actual statute section that it represents is listed.

The Public Salary Tax Act of 1939

The Current Tax Payment Act of 1943

Elements of the Victory Tax Act and their repeal

The IRC of 1954

The Internal Revenue Code of 1986

Code of Federal Regulations for Title 26 (Internal Revenue)

Congress passed the Act > Statutes written > then Regulations > then Codes.

[TastyWheat]

I recently came under the impression IRS regulations are essentially laws because the agency was given authorization from Congress. Kind of like how you can't go selling homemade sleeping pills. The Congress didn't make a law saying it's illegal to sell your pills, but the FDA made regulations that say you can't sell your drug without being properly fucked by their regulations. I haven't done serious study on the issue, so maybe that argument doesn't hold water.

[constituent]

I recently came under the impression IRS regulations are essentially laws because the agency was given authorization from Congress. Kind of like how you can't go selling homemade sleeping pills. The Congress didn't make a law saying it's illegal to sell your pills, but the FDA made regulations that say you can't sell your drug without being properly fucked by their regulations. I haven't done serious study on the issue, so maybe that argument doesn't hold water.

the question then become whether or not congress can lawfully delegate their powers...

this issue applies to the income tax, fda, federal reserve, war powers, etc.

[TastyWheat]

the question then become whether or not congress can lawfully delegate their powers...

this issue applies to the income tax, fda, federal reserve, war powers, etc.
Well, it depends on how literal you want to get. If only Congress can coin money then does that mean they have to run the machines?