I'm not a one issue voter!

[Menthol Patch]

Someone in another thread just accused me of being a "one issue voter."

I want to refute this lie.

I'm NOT a one issue voter. I will not vote for any candidate that does not support ALL of the following.

1) Abolishing the IRS and replacing the income tax with nothing.

2) Ending the war on drugs by legalizing all drugs.

3) Ending the war in Iraq and the war on terror.

4) Abolishing the FED.

5) Restoring the Bill of Rights.

6) Abolishing the Patriot Act.

If a candidate does not support ALL of the above he is not worth voting for!

[nate895]

You still are a stubborn jerk who can't compromise. Your place is in the pseudo-intellectual college coffee houses, not in political forums.

[Menthol Patch]

You still are a stubborn jerk who can't compromise. Your place is in the pseudo-intellectual college coffee houses, not in political forums.

I will compromise on many things.

I refuse to compromise on freedom.

[Mark]

Honestly, a thread like this makes you seem like an attention whore.

[Menthol Patch]

A thread like this makes you seem like an attention whore.

No, I'm just standing up against all the pragmatic compromisers on this forum.

[Micah Dardar]

Menthol, I am with you. The time for compromise is over. Those before us have compromised us into what we have today. We can't be flip floppers if we really want to make people believe that we have confidence in our message. There is no more compromising liberty and the Constitution.

[Menthol Patch]

Menthol, I am with you. The time for compromise is over. Those before us have compromised us into what we have today. We can't be flip floppers if we really want to make people believe that we have confidence in our message. There is no more compromising liberty and the Constitution.

Thank you. I agree that there is no room for compromise when it comes to liberty.

[JosephTheLibertarian]

Someone in another thread just accused me of being a "one issue voter."

I want to refute this lie.

I'm NOT a one issue voter. I will not vote for any candidate that does not support ALL of the following.

1) Abolishing the IRS and replacing the income tax with nothing.

2) Ending the war on drugs by legalizing all drugs.

3) Ending the war in Iraq and the war on terror.

4) Abolishing the FED.

5) Restoring the Bill of Rights.

6) Abolishing the Patriot Act.

If a candidate does not support ALL of the above he is not worth voting for!

Protestionist Baldwin supporters are intolerant and nasty rightwingers.

1. agree

2. agree

3. agree

4. agree

5. nah. we should throw it away. let's diassemble government, once and for all.

6. agree

[nate895]

Protestionist Baldwin supporters are intolerant and nasty rightwingers.

1. agree

2. agree

3. agree

4. agree

5. nah. we should throw it away. let's diassemble government, once and for all.

6. agree

Ron Paul is an intolerant and nasty rightwinger?

BTW, I wasn't supporting Baldwin until Paul endorsed.

[Highland]

Protestionist Baldwin supporters are intolerant and nasty rightwingers.

1. agree

2. agree

3. agree

4. agree

5. nah. we should throw it away. let's dissemble government, once and for all.

6. agree

I am NOT....that is a rude and nasty statement in itself...I am disappointed in you Joseph

[Andrew-Austin]

Your a one issue voter in that you would not support / vote for a Ron Paul who could not promise to legalize all drugs immediately. Your a one issue voter in that you put an absurd amount of emphasis on the right to snort coke, putting that right on par with the issue of mass slavery via the income tax etc.

You can't acknowledge that it is worth voting for a man who promises to end the Fed, IRS, income tax, all foreign wars/entanglements, domestic spying, torture, etc IF he does not at the same time promise to legalize all drugs immediately. That is what you have been saying, and it does not make any fucking sense.

I went through your thread history (yes sad that I did that but w/e), and you have made a ton of threads about the drug war. Nothing wrong with that, except that you still have failed to explain the above, which leads me to believe that the drug war is a radically more important issue to you then it should be for some "special reason".



Menthol, I am with you. The time for compromise is over. Those before us have compromised us into what we have today. We can't be flip floppers if we really want to make people believe that we have confidence in our message. There is no more compromising liberty and the Constitution.

No comprises need to be made. I suggest you read his other thread about Baldwin to see what we are talking about here.

[mediahasyou]

I am not a voter. (http://members.aol.com/vlntryst/wn103.html)

[JosephTheLibertarian]

I am NOT....that is a rude and nasty statement in itself...I am disappointed in you Joseph

How can I go on living now? You are disappointed in me, so I lost my reason to live now lol.

Well, it all depends on which political spectrum map that you use. ;)

I don't care who endorses who, I do my own thinking.

[Micah Dardar]

Jeez, take a few puffs and calm down peepz. tsk tsk :p

[Live_Free_Or_Die]

nt

[Danke]

Someone in another thread just accused me of being a "one issue voter."

I want to refute this lie.

I'm NOT a one issue voter. I will not vote for any candidate that does not support ALL of the following.

1) Abolishing the IRS and replacing the income tax with nothing.

2) Ending the war on drugs by legalizing all drugs.

3) Ending the war in Iraq and the war on terror.

4) Abolishing the FED.

5) Restoring the Bill of Rights.

6) Abolishing the Patriot Act.

If a candidate does not support ALL of the above he is not worth voting for!

You believe in no Federal Taxation? Or do you want to replace the IRS with some other tax collection agency?

[dawnbt]

Is this now the Menthol Patch Forums? Off your soapbox man, it's getting old.