David Jon Spoonheim--- Our Next Prez.

[RonpaulSupporter7777]

Sorry, but I seem to have misspelled his name. Its actually "David Jon Sponheim".

Check out the website called "americas third party". Check out David's "live" Blogtv show weeknights at 5 pm on "BlogTV.com". He is so awesome and you can ask him questions live. He actually answers your questions live.

Imagine a President that would broadcast to the American People live from the Oval Office. He would put webcams in every congressional office of every congressman so that you could see what they are up to. Discussions would be open to everybody.

PLEEEAAAAAASEEE check out his BlogTV show on americasthirdparty.com

It's Absolutely Awesome. AND DID I FORGET TO SAY THAT THE GUY LOVES RON PAUL!!!!!!!

[berrybunches]

Link?

[Knightskye]

I looked it up in Google - top result, this thread.

I tried Google's video search (which doesn't just search Google Video or YouTube). No results.

No Wikipedia page... no image in Google image search result.

Who the heck is this guy?

[PauliticsPolitics]

the OP is refering to http://www.blogtv.com/People/AmericasThirdParty

[nate895]

I found this website. (http://americasthirdparty.com/)

The man believes that the government should open up corporations to compete with the private industries. I cannot vote for that.

[ValidusCustodiae]

7/9/08 3:04PM 1st_Order
Just one thing
When we hear McCain name, we think fries When we hear Obama/Binen name, we think Ossama ben ladin. So there could be a problem with your name, sound like a german spoon :) no offense but its funny.




heheh quoted from his comments section, pretty funny..

[RonpaulSupporter7777]

Sponheim believes:

* The US should end the war in Iraq.
* The US should fix all roads, bridges and infrastructure.
* The income tax should be abolished.
* The World Trade Organization should be abolished.
* NAFTA should be abolished.
* The US should put our soldiers on our borders w/ unmaned drones.
* Affirmative Action is not neccessary.
* The US should become Energy Independent through renuable resources.
* Creating decent paying Federal jobs in the expanding Alternative energy sector.
* He does not believe that we need an assault weapons ban.
* He believes in ending the Federal death penalty.
* Legalizing Marijauna and Hemp.
* Their should be an independent investigation into the practices of the Federal Reserve banking system.
* The military draft and the selective service should cease to exist.


This guy is a progressive libertarian. He is a centrist among the third parties and independents. He is exactly what this movement needs in order to unite under liberty and security of our nation.

What is everybody going to do when 2012 rolls around and Ron Paul says that he does not want to run for president again. Are we all going to go our seperate ways and criticize eachothers solutions because they seem to be liberal?

Ron Paul has taken a liberal stance on Medicare and Medicaid. By saying that he would fund these two programs with the money saved from cutting overseas spending is just another transfer of tax dollars and borrowed money. I understand why he is doing it and totally support him. He wants to phase them out gradually until another system of healthcare can be set in place.

Lets not totally discard candidates who may not share our views on one or two issues. Even Ron Paul has endorsed the candidacy of Ralph Nader, Cynthia Mckinney, and even Bob Barr. These are all candidates that we share our differences with, but they are advocating policies that fit with the revolution. Ron Paul's seal of approval for their candidacies is not just a kind gesture, but also an important step in uniting the effort for the fundamentals of Liberty

David Jon Sponheim supports the 4 issues that Ron Paul made all third party candidates adhere to for his support. I not saying that you have to vote for the guy or neccessarily agree with everything that he has to say, but definitely check out his show on BLOGTV.com. He's right there to ask questions to and is open to new ideas. He is very interested in Mises.org and LewRockwell.com. The Revolution in influencing him economically.

David wants to unite the third party movement and get into the debates and mix it up with the Dems and Repubs. Please take the time to sign his petition as well. This is the time of the third parties and we have to support their movement if we want an alternative to the establishment candidates.:)

[CasualApathy]

Sponheim believes:

* The US should end the war in Iraq.
* The US should fix all roads, bridges and infrastructure.
* The income tax should be abolished.
* The World Trade Organization should be abolished.
* NAFTA should be abolished.
* The US should put our soldiers on our borders w/ unmaned drones.
* Affirmative Action is not neccessary.
* The US should become Energy Independent through renuable resources.
* Creating decent paying Federal jobs in the expanding Alternative energy sector.
* He does not believe that we need an assault weapons ban.
* He believes in ending the Federal death penalty.
* Legalizing Marijauna and Hemp.
* Their should be an independent investigation into the practices of the Federal Reserve banking system.
* The military draft and the selective service should cease to exist.


This guy is a progressive libertarian. He is a centrist among the third parties and independents. He is exactly what this movement needs in order to unite under liberty and security of our nation.

What is everybody going to do when 2012 rolls around and Ron Paul says that he does not want to run for president again. Are we all going to go our seperate ways and criticize eachothers solutions because they seem to be liberal?

Ron Paul has taken a liberal stance on Medicare and Medicaid. By saying that he would fund these two programs with the money saved from cutting overseas spending is just another transfer of tax dollars and borrowed money. I understand why he is doing it and totally support him. He wants to phase them out gradually until another system of healthcare can be set in place.

Lets not totally discard candidates who may not share our views on one or two issues. Even Ron Paul has endorsed the candidacy of Ralph Nader, Cynthia Mckinney, and even Bob Barr. These are all candidates that we share our differences with, but they are advocating policies that fit with the revolution. Ron Paul's seal of approval for their candidacies is not just a kind gesture, but also an important step in uniting the effort for the fundamentals of Liberty

David Jon Sponheim supports the 4 issues that Ron Paul made all third party candidates adhere to for his support. I not saying that you have to vote for the guy or neccessarily agree with everything that he has to say, but definitely check out his show on BLOGTV.com. He's right there to ask questions to and is open to new ideas. He is very interested in Mises.org and LewRockwell.com. The Revolution in influencing him economically.

David wants to unite the third party movement and get into the debates and mix it up with the Dems and Repubs. Please take the time to sign his petition as well. This is the time of the third parties and we have to support their movement if we want an alternative to the establishment candidates.:)

He sounds great. We can't be so picky that we reject people because they have small deviations from Ron Paul. We need to look at the big picture and not reject good candidates because they are "wrong" on one or two issues.

[RonpaulSupporter7777]

Exactly CasualApathy.:cool:

[RonpaulSupporter7777]

Oh and just a reminder. David's show starts at 5 pm tonight on Blogtv.com He will be live for about 5-6 hrs answering all the questions people sumbit via the live chat.;)

[nate895]

He sounds great. We can't be so picky that we reject people because they have small deviations from Ron Paul. We need to look at the big picture and not reject good candidates because they are "wrong" on one or two issues.

Socializing industry isn't exactly something I am willing to compromise on.

[RonpaulSupporter7777]

Nate if you do not agree with this Pleeeeaaaaaaaaaasssssseeeeeee come check out the show and ask him why he supports this and you don't . Send him a link to why you feel that this is wrong. He is more than willing to debate these types of issues. With all the stupid questions some people are asking him on Blogtv.com he would probably be estastic.:eek:

[Knightskye]

Dude's a liberal. No way.


* Enforce The Clean Air Act With Carbon Point Program
* Sign The Kyoto Accord- Clean The Global Environment
* Clean Up Superfund Sites Plus Lakes And Waterways
* Mandate Fuel Efficiency In New Cars And Trucks
* Support Sustainable Agriculture For The Future
* Air Filtration Systems To Control Particulates

Spoonheimer can go Spoon Heimer.

[RonpaulSupporter7777]

Knightskye. I can understand your repulsion of the Kyoto treaty and a Carbon Point Program, but what is so bad about cleaning up contaminated lakes and waterways?

What is so bad about mandating that automotive manufacturers increase the fuel efficiency in all new cars and trucks? (We are paying an arm and a leg for gasoline as it is).

What is so bad about sustainable agriculture? (We need to make more food available for the hungry at lower prices. That means lowering the cost to manufacture the stuff. Sustainable means continuing.).

Again, what is the big deal with having air filtration systems?. The air in industrial areas is toxic to breathe. Kids are having asthma at school because they are so close to these rediculously old smoke stacks.

The environmental issues of our day should come as a concern to Conservatives, not just liberals and progressives. Progressive environmental ideas are not always liberal, sometimes they are just common sense. It's too bad Ron Paul falls right into the same Conservative Republican stereotype that buisness takes precedent over nature.

Ron Paul did not emphasize anything significant in the televised debates in regards to the environment. He is not going to unite the movement unless he puts environmental solutions on par with sound buisness practices.

(I will say this. Ron Paul's idea for prosecuting polluters through forensic evidence such as soot particles is beyond progressive. This should have been a talking point for him in the debates. He would've gotten a big thumbs up from environmentalists and wouldve divided himself further from Big Buisness Republicans.)