PDA

View Full Version : Ron Paul's IQ: Infinite... fooken GENIUS




Rhys
09-10-2008, 05:34 PM
He may have brought about the end of the two party system today. Take a moment and digest that thought.....

...ok, good work.

We've made a lot of progress this year, but seeing him sit next to Ralph Nader on CNN gave me goose bumps.

It's like this.... now the revolution just became a true big tent. Left, right.... love, revolution. It's all the same now.

The two parties were given a terminal illness today. It may take a while for them to die from it, but it is surely incurable.

Grimnir Wotansvolk
09-10-2008, 05:37 PM
This isn't anywhere near the end, but it's a start.

Let's hope that the supporters on both sides of the aisle keep things together. Frankly, I've seen more than enough to not be optimistic about that.

BLuegreengrey
09-10-2008, 05:38 PM
Genius

libertythor
09-10-2008, 05:40 PM
His IQ is definitely over 135!

Matt Collins
09-10-2008, 06:14 PM
If Cynthia, Nader, Bob, and Chuck all do an independent debate, with all of the supporters raising as much hell to the MSM about it as possible, I think it could bring attention to it. The other option is of course buying time on a major network for the debate can calling it "The Alternative Presidential Debate" or something of that nature.

mcgraw_wv
09-10-2008, 06:18 PM
OR make some real noise, come together, and designate one member to represent all, and have a truly noticable party dedicated to individual rights, small government, and liberty...

Matt Collins
09-10-2008, 06:19 PM
designate one member to represent all, and have a truly noticable party dedicated to individual rights, small government, and liberty...That would exclude Nader and Cynthia because they don't recognize those things.

mcgraw_wv
09-10-2008, 06:26 PM
That would exclude Nader and Cynthia because they don't recognize those things.

Nader supports the 4 principles of what Ron talked about today... those 4 principles are ALL we need to form a party... every one can leave their special interests at the door, as most special interests can fit right in the 4 principles...

NAder was huge on board, and I actually Loved seeing Nad4er and Paul on CNN today... Nader has a national draw... And I think Nader and Paul should work our a unity party base don the "4 principles of liberty"

chowdy
09-10-2008, 06:49 PM
It's over 9000.

HOLLYWOOD
09-10-2008, 06:51 PM
If Cynthia, Nader, Bob, and Chuck all do an independent debate, with all of the supporters raising as much hell to the MSM about it as possible, I think it could bring attention to it. The other option is of course buying time on a major network for the debate can calling it "The Alternative Presidential Debate" or something of that nature.

Need a good 3rd party debate at Major Political University: ???

PS: Anywhere except that NAZI BUSH FAMILY KLAN'S alma mater: SS YALE university

constituent
09-10-2008, 06:53 PM
He may have brought about the end of the two party system today. Take a moment and digest that thought.....

...ok, good work.

We've made a lot of progress this year, but seeing him sit next to Ralph Nader on CNN gave me goose bumps.

It's like this.... now the revolution just became a true big tent. Left, right.... love, revolution. It's all the same now.

The two parties were given a terminal illness today. It may take a while for them to die from it, but it is surely incurable.

good job rhys, absolutely right.

HOLLYWOOD
09-10-2008, 06:53 PM
Nader supports the 4 principles of what Ron talked about today... those 4 principles are ALL we need to form a party... every one can leave their special interests at the door, as most special interests can fit right in the 4 principles...

CONSTITUTIONAL
CITIZEN's
COUNTRY
PARTY


shorted that to: CCCP :rolleyes:


hehe

constituent
09-10-2008, 06:55 PM
If Cynthia, Nader, Bob, and Chuck all do an independent debate, with all of the supporters raising as much hell to the MSM about it as possible, I think it could bring attention to it. The other option is of course buying time on a major network for the debate can calling it "The Alternative Presidential Debate" or something of that nature.

With the right questions, the subject matter covered and the various perspectives that came together would make for (internet)television history.

No doubt about that.

Maybe Ron Paul and/or Bill Moyers moderating.


(won't happen)

Indy Vidual
09-10-2008, 07:07 PM
I wonder what Ron's IQ really is?

Matt Collins
09-10-2008, 07:08 PM
Maybe Ron Paul and/or Bill Moyers moderating.
Maybe we could ask Tucker to do it? :D :p ;)

anaconda
09-10-2008, 07:10 PM
He may have brought about the end of the two party system today. Take a moment and digest that thought.....

...ok, good work.

We've made a lot of progress this year, but seeing him sit next to Ralph Nader on CNN gave me goose bumps.

It's like this.... now the revolution just became a true big tent. Left, right.... love, revolution. It's all the same now.

The two parties were given a terminal illness today. It may take a while for them to die from it, but it is surely incurable.

I could not have said this better! I am excited about this, too! If this results in just 3 or 4% of the people who would have voted for Obama or McCain to go third party it will be HUGE. With bigger things to come.

ProBlue33
09-10-2008, 07:17 PM
What they need to do is combine all resources with the 4 point platforum they brought out on CNN.

And run a single ticket on those 4 issues alone. Merge all those parties into a new party that would have a fighting chance call it "The American Party"

This would take away all the vote splitting and create a new third party that could actually compete.

kjdaugirdas
09-10-2008, 07:24 PM
Man, I am so happy that Ron Paul is learning to PRIORITIZE. This is not the "annoying little fly whining about the Gold Standard." This is a real leader of a bold new movement that is becoming bigger than Ron Paul, or even "Ron Paul people."

He brought this whole thing together, and he found the FOUR MAIN ISSUES that really make the biggest difference in our lives, and got those three people to agree.

There is such a thing as CRITICAL MASS when it comes to these things...

Awesome.

Which leads me to say, "Bob Barr, you suck." What a selfish bastard. He truly is playing to be spoiler, rather than wanting change to actually happen. If he wanted to change things, he'd be doing what Ron is doing.

LS4702
09-10-2008, 08:15 PM
I don't post often, in fact hardly ever. (though a constant reader) I have some thoughts that I wanted to covey among those that have my utmost respect. When Dr. Paul stated he had an announcement everyone(!) began speculation on what that would be. That's fine. But what happened is everyone stated THEIR "perfect" statement. Wow. What a lot for anyone, even Dr. Paul to live up to. (OMG, I have CNN on and someone just compared Palin to R. Reagan - Lord help us all!) Anyways, I just wanted to say that I love Ron Paul for being the truly honest man that we have fallin' in love with. His honesty and integrity continue. I have considered my options. (OMG - Biden just said Palin is "first rate" on CNN- what the hell is that about?) I am looking at voting for Baldwin this election. I live in Arkansas. I will be paying attention up to the election however. Ron Paul is "a good man". Think about that. All of us can categorize what that means, but how many people do you personally know that even possibly live up to such? I am just sick that I even can't get my sister to understand small govt., non-intervention, and personal freedom. She thinks blowing up Iraq & Iran would solve things! I have found either people "get it" or they don't. Period. So, I have learned that it is not so much about convincing people, rather it is about exposing them to the truth - it will either sink in or be lost. So that is our job. Force feeding doesn't work - but rather educating, enlightening, & simplifying what media makes complicated. In their heart people KNOW what's right. The problem is that we are lazy. We want to be spoon fed and not make any decisions. But once people learn, once they connect, it's remarkable....

BeFranklin
09-10-2008, 08:28 PM
Smarter than the average bear.

http://barkbarkwoofwoof.blogspot.com/Yogi%20Bear%20Cropped%2012-11-05.JPG

idiom
09-10-2008, 08:33 PM
What RP is doing is so visionary that it just makes Bob look like a *real* jackass.

LS4702
09-10-2008, 08:45 PM
Hey Yogi bear, was that comment for me?

anaconda
09-10-2008, 09:10 PM
What they need to do is combine all resources with the 4 point platforum they brought out on CNN.

And run a single ticket on those 4 issues alone. Merge all those parties into a new party that would have a fighting chance call it "The American Party"

This would take away all the vote splitting and create a new third party that could actually compete.

Brilliant idea.

fr33domfightr
09-10-2008, 09:27 PM
You guys gave me the best idea for the next big money bomb. It's got to be a debate moneybomb. Maybe the CFL could be a co-sponsor, or just sponsored by "the people." Why can't WE sponsor our own people's presidential debate????

I can't see anyone running for president would refuse. After all, it would be sponsored by the people, for the people.

We sponsor it, and we control the questions as well.


FF

CMoore
09-10-2008, 09:42 PM
This truly is visionary. Just imagine. If the combined third party vote is enough to cover the spread between the two major candidates, then the ideas espoused by this movement will have to be considered going forward. They can't ignore them any more.

Rhys
09-10-2008, 10:09 PM
You guys gave me the best idea for the next big money bomb. It's got to be a debate moneybomb. Maybe the CFL could be a co-sponsor, or just sponsored by "the people." Why can't WE sponsor our own people's presidential debate????

I can't see anyone running for president would refuse. After all, it would be sponsored by the people, for the people.

We sponsor it, and we control the questions as well.


FF

your right. the webpage has a ticker for all three real candidates.

nader could pull in as much as 30 million... the other two could have his fallout

anaconda
09-10-2008, 10:50 PM
Let's do it! Debate.

It would be a fascinating turn if all of the third party candidates endorsed just one among themselves, attempting to consolidate the 3rd party vote. Based on the four-point platform.

I don't see why we can't have a debate. I'll bet at least C-Span would pick it up. It shouldn't cost very much at all.

idiom
09-10-2008, 11:06 PM
Barr wouldn't show. He is to good for the other lesser parties.

We only bring him shame.

Conza88
09-11-2008, 02:20 AM
In the end... it goes like this:

% for Socialists (Democrats) / % for Fascists (Republicans) / % for those that reject both.

As long as you don't for either of the S & F's... we'll be right.