PDA

View Full Version : WOOT we made CNN! RPF




Joseph Hart
09-10-2008, 02:23 PM
Wooot!

0zzy
09-10-2008, 02:24 PM
we're cool! hhahaha.

Nader is BIG!

Kludge
09-10-2008, 02:24 PM
Lmao, just saw that.


Unreal. Barr just got mentioned for the first time today regarding the press conference :p

powerofreason
09-10-2008, 02:24 PM
I saw that!

idiom
09-10-2008, 02:25 PM
Hi Mum!

JenH88
09-10-2008, 02:25 PM
How about you share what's happening with those of us who refuse to pay corporations for lies. =)

Rhys
09-10-2008, 02:25 PM
lol go Liberty!

this cooler than when I got RPF mentioned in the UK Guardian for the Rocket! zoom!

Join The Paul Side
09-10-2008, 02:25 PM
Toob it please. :D

Drknows
09-10-2008, 02:26 PM
Ron paulllllll!!!!!!!!!!)00100!

Dorfsmith
09-10-2008, 02:27 PM
What did they say???

amy31416
09-10-2008, 02:28 PM
toob it please. :d

+11111111

DAFTEK
09-10-2008, 02:30 PM
hehe, hey all :p

specsaregood
09-10-2008, 02:33 PM
What did they say???

they focused on the negativity and divisiveness.
In fact they must have *waited* to take a screen shot where the top two threads on the screen were:

"I pledge not to vote for Bob Barr"
"I pledge not to vote for Baldwin"

Either they waited to take the screen shot that had those together at the top of the page or "agents" here bumped it that way so they could get their screenshot....

nayjevin
09-10-2008, 02:34 PM
They showed a screen shot of a couple of threads, including I VOW TO NEVER VOTE FOR BARR and I VOW TO NEVER VOTE FOR BALDWIN

trying to show that RP's encouragment of his followers to vote 3rd party won't work by isolating a couple of idiotic threads where folks have been prosthelatizing

nayjevin
09-10-2008, 02:35 PM
they focused on the negativity and divisiveness.
In fact they must have *waited* to take a screen shot where the top two threads on the screen were:

"I pledge not to vote for Bob Barr"
"I pledge not to vote for Baldwin"

Either they waited to take the screen shot that had those together at the top of the page or "agents" here bumped it that way so they could get their screenshot....

ya, that's a better way to put it.

brandon
09-10-2008, 02:35 PM
Who the fuck started that anti-baldwin thread. Fucking moron.

Flash
09-10-2008, 02:35 PM
i was pissed I didn't post the exact time they showed the forums,.

texasbelle
09-10-2008, 02:37 PM
I saw it! :)

tropicangela
09-10-2008, 02:37 PM
they focused on the negativity and divisiveness.
In fact they must have *waited* to take a screen shot where the top two threads on the screen were:

"I pledge not to vote for Bob Barr"
"I pledge not to vote for Baldwin"

Either they waited to take the screen shot that had those together at the top of the page or "agents" here bumped it that way so they could get their screenshot....

MSM haven't you done enough damage?

0zzy
09-10-2008, 02:38 PM
Who the fuck started that anti-baldwin thread. Fucking moron.

you're intelligent.

dr. hfn
09-10-2008, 02:40 PM
Sweet, someone should send messages to all the registered users to get active even more! The Revolution is here to stay!

KewlRonduderules
09-10-2008, 02:40 PM
This is what the establishment intended on doing from all along- disrupt us. Barr was part of it. Hate to sound like a Conspiracy theorist but it seems that way

specsaregood
09-10-2008, 02:41 PM
This is what the establishment intended on doing from all along- disrupt us. Barr was part of it. Hate to sound like a Conspiracy theorist but it seems that way

Indeed. They specifically targeted the reason for the press conference "unity" and figured out how to best derail it. Activate B.Barrs microchip implant.
/only half joking....

nayjevin
09-10-2008, 02:42 PM
RP and Nader were both good. Wolf tried to make it look like they were an 'odd couple' at the end.

brunner
09-10-2008, 02:57 PM
So where's the YouTube link?

constituent
09-10-2008, 03:01 PM
So where's the YouTube link?

it wasn't important enough.... the youtube guy had something really pressing going on just after the p.c. and couldn't make it to the vcr in time.

kathy88
09-10-2008, 03:11 PM
NOT GOOD ENOUGH FOR THE AMERICAN PEOPLE!!!!!!!!!

Rock on with yer bad self, Nader.

moostraks
09-10-2008, 03:36 PM
LOL!!! For a bunch of spammers that serve no consequence to the election we do manage to rile up press coverage on occasion...

JoshLowry
09-10-2008, 03:45 PM
Ha, very cool!

Here's the video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eEw0qKjP7hk

rockandrollsouls
09-10-2008, 03:47 PM
MSM haven't you done enough damage?

You guys tend to damage yourselves. Truth movement, saying untrue things about candidates, basically just speculating and having a hateful nature. I can't say I expected more out of some of you, though.

CurtisLow
09-10-2008, 04:00 PM
http://img357.imageshack.us/img357/3229/zzmi4.jpg

:D

rockandrollsouls
09-10-2008, 04:07 PM
^^^ do we need anymore proof :confused:

And, let me reiterate, Ron has not said anything against Barr as of yet and there were no poor words for him during his CNN interview. Barr signed off on that proposal. You guys are basically saying "OMG NEOCON I KNEW IT" because he didn't show up. Stop fighting eachother and fight for liberty. I'll listen to Barr, Baldwin, Nader, or anyone who cares about the Constitution. Ron brought them together, and some of you want to tear it apart. I trust Ron's judgment.

HOLLYWOOD
09-10-2008, 04:21 PM
Here yah go:

http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a361/mzcmdr/Pictures2008012-1.jpg

http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a361/mzcmdr/Pictures2008008-1.jpg

http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a361/mzcmdr/Pictures2008003.jpg

http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a361/mzcmdr/Pictures2008006.jpg

http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a361/mzcmdr/Pictures2008014-1.jpg

http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a361/mzcmdr/Pictures2008013-1.jpg

http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a361/mzcmdr/Pictures2008005.jpg

Kludge
09-10-2008, 04:23 PM
http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a361/mzcmdr/Pictures2008014-1.jpg

Thanks. Couldn't help but chuckle at this one.

Bman
09-10-2008, 04:25 PM
It was probably someone working at CNN who posted I will never vote for ... threads.

It just makes the most sense.

Kludge
09-10-2008, 04:26 PM
It was probably someone working at CNN who posted I will never vote for ... threads.

Nope. They were probably refreshing their screens in hopes to get the shot they did though.

HOLLYWOOD
09-10-2008, 04:26 PM
Hey, One More... :cool:

Campaign Rebels!

http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a361/mzcmdr/Pictures2008001.jpg

RonPaulFanInGA
09-10-2008, 04:27 PM
Here yah go:

http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a361/mzcmdr/Pictures2008012-1.jpg

http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a361/mzcmdr/Pictures2008008-1.jpg


Uh-oh....

HOLLYWOOD
09-10-2008, 04:30 PM
hey...

Wolf Biltzer is a TROLL on RPF!!!


I knew that pic and handle had a true "CNN" meaning!


Amazing, Amazing!:D

speciallyblend
09-10-2008, 04:38 PM
ran paul fan in ga added to my mccain list for making a stupid thread , barr is a schmuck forever

Conza88
09-11-2008, 01:51 AM
someone go investigate who bumped all those threads at about the same time.. so they got their photo.

I'll do it in a bit.

kathy88
09-11-2008, 03:50 AM
bump... Conza, did you figure this out?

nodope0695
09-11-2008, 03:52 AM
what happened???:confused:

Conza88
09-11-2008, 04:41 AM
bump... Conza, did you figure this out?

Haven't bothered yet. Busy.

I think someone else said they did in another thread... said it didn't line up.

I guess they could have editted the image.

Edit:

Ok it doesn't make any sense... in order to get:

Going off the pics... the bump would have occurred in the 3rd page for: who are you voting for? That leaves; 04:28 AM, 04:29 AM, 04:41 AM.


This is the starting blocs. Now one of these posts has to have come BEFORE the thread; which is below it -- "Let's Stop Overreacting about Barr!"

Except; it was CREATED @ 04:58 AM.... :confused: Haha... so it's impossible for a thread whose last post is at 4.41am.... to be AHEAD of a thread CREATED at 4.58am....

CNN doctored the image. That's my analysis anyway. :eek:

Re-Edit: Yeah, I can't see any other way.. according to the times.. where if it was natural, you'd be looking at thread 1; thread 2; thread 3; thread 4... all containing posting times pretty closely, before a time that would bump the thread above another.

Bryan
09-11-2008, 08:44 AM
What I think is funny about this is how Abbi presented RPFs in such a way that one should naturally know about the forum. :)



CNN doctored the image. That's my analysis anyway. :eek:

Re-Edit: Yeah, I can't see any other way.. according to the times.. where if it was natural, you'd be looking at thread 1; thread 2; thread 3; thread 4... all containing posting times pretty closely, before a time that would bump the thread above another.
It's what they've done in the past. You can note that they also removed a good deal between the banner pic and the threads- there are only two lines (one blue and one red) while there is really a lot more than that. I guess I don't see it as a big deal.

acptulsa
09-11-2008, 08:47 AM
It's what they've done in the past. You can note that they also removed a good deal between the banner pic and the threads- there are only two lines (one blue and one red) while there is really a lot more than that. I guess I don't see it as a big deal.

It is mildly interesting, however, that forsmant said yesterday that there was a moment when they did line up that way.

brandon
09-11-2008, 08:52 AM
It's what they've done in the past. You can note that they also removed a good deal between the banner pic and the threads- there are only two lines (one blue and one red) while there is really a lot more than that. I guess I don't see it as a big deal.

keen observation, Mr. Mossad. ;)

Conza88
09-11-2008, 08:52 AM
It is mildly interesting, however, that forsmant said yesterday that there was a moment when they did line up that way.

Not possible from what I've seen / calculated. Would like his run down on it. I didn't particularly outline mine very well but I think it's understandable. :)

And yeah Bryan, not much of a big deal really.... but they did manipulate it to show as if it appears it's all we're talking about.

This is the place to be though. lol :D

dawnbt
09-11-2008, 09:00 AM
Heh Heh, my handle was on CNN.

constituent
09-11-2008, 09:02 AM
Here yah go:

http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a361/mzcmdr/Pictures2008012-1.jpg


something tells me dr.'d.

acptulsa
09-11-2008, 09:10 AM
something tells me dr.'d.

If only doctored news was still surprising. I miss those days...

brandon
09-11-2008, 09:54 AM
Yea, clearly the whole thing was photoshopped together. Check out the vertical lines....

http://img293.imageshack.us/img293/5653/54158028rs7.png (http://imageshack.us)
http://img293.imageshack.us/img293/54158028rs7.png/1/w640.png (http://g.imageshack.us/img293/54158028rs7.png/1/)

Aratus
09-11-2008, 09:57 AM
double w00t and double WOW!!! good for us!!! ~~~ so did someone give poor chuck baldwin a zap or just publicity via an AVID WORKSTATION?

Kludge
09-11-2008, 01:34 PM
Does it matter if it was photoshopped or not?

The threads existed and were given attention. Nothing was taken out of context.


Now, if they changed the wording of the title to "Let's get gay with Barr and rape aliens"...

LittleLightShining
09-11-2008, 01:41 PM
Haven't bothered yet. Busy.

I think someone else said they did in another thread... said it didn't line up.

I guess they could have editted the image.

Edit:

Ok it doesn't make any sense... in order to get:

Going off the pics... the bump would have occurred in the 3rd page for: who are you voting for? That leaves; 04:28 AM, 04:29 AM, 04:41 AM.


This is the starting blocs. Now one of these posts has to have come BEFORE the thread; which is below it -- "Let's Stop Overreacting about Barr!"

Except; it was CREATED @ 04:58 AM.... :confused: Haha... so it's impossible for a thread whose last post is at 4.41am.... to be AHEAD of a thread CREATED at 4.58am....

CNN doctored the image. That's my analysis anyway. :eek:

Re-Edit: Yeah, I can't see any other way.. according to the times.. where if it was natural, you'd be looking at thread 1; thread 2; thread 3; thread 4... all containing posting times pretty closely, before a time that would bump the thread above another.


What I think is funny about this is how Abbi presented RPFs in such a way that one should naturally know about the forum. :)


It's what they've done in the past. You can note that they also removed a good deal between the banner pic and the threads- there are only two lines (one blue and one red) while there is really a lot more than that. I guess I don't see it as a big deal.


something tells me dr.'d.


Yea, clearly the whole thing was photoshopped together. Check out the vertical lines....
You guys are good! I never would have thought that in a million years. I am so completely gullible and skeptical at the same time :(

tropicangela
09-11-2008, 01:47 PM
Yea, clearly the whole thing was photoshopped together. Check out the vertical lines....

http://img293.imageshack.us/img293/5653/54158028rs7.png (http://imageshack.us)
http://img293.imageshack.us/img293/54158028rs7.png/1/w640.png (http://g.imageshack.us/img293/54158028rs7.png/1/)

Wow. This certainly doesn't look like what I am seeing in the real world of Ron Paul Forums.

brandon
09-11-2008, 02:07 PM
Does it matter if it was photoshopped or not?

The threads existed and were given attention. Nothing was taken out of context.


Now, if they changed the wording of the title to "Let's get gay with Barr and rape aliens"...

I wish my "bryan is Mossad" thread made it onto CNN. :)