PDA

View Full Version : Justice Dept. Hires 'Super Lawyer' For Possible Google Antitrust Fight




Fox McCloud
09-09-2008, 11:52 AM
The Department of Justice has been reviewing the proposed ad deal that Google and Yahoo announced in June for possible antitrust action.

The U.S. Department of Justice may be arming for an antitrust showdown with Google (NSDQ: GOOG).

On Monday evening, The Wall Street Journal reported that the Department of Justice has secretly hired well-known litigator Sandy Litvack, former general counsel for Walt Disney (NYSE: DIS).

During the Carter administration, Litvack served as Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice.

WSJ writer John R. Wilke states, "Litvack's hiring is the strongest signal yet that the U.S. is preparing to take antitrust action against Google and its advertising deal with Yahoo (NSDQ: YHOO) Inc."

The Department of Justice has been reviewing the proposed ad deal that Google and Yahoo announced in June for possible antitrust action.

House and Senate Committees also heard testimony both for and against the deal in July.

Google declined to comment specifically on the significance of Litvack's purported hiring.

In an e-mailed statement, a Google spokesperson said, "We voluntarily delayed implementation of this arrangement to give the Department of Justice time to understand it, and we continue to work cooperatively with them. While there has been a lot of speculation about this agreement's potential impact on advertisers or ad prices, we think it would be premature for regulators to halt the agreement before we implement it and everyone can judge the actual impact. We are confident that the arrangement is beneficial to competition, but we are not going to discuss the details of the regulatory process."

Litvack resigned from law firm Hogan & Hartson LLP last week, according to The Wall Street Journal, and was hired by Thomas Barnett, the current Assistant Attorney General in charge of Antitrust.

On Monday evening, Litvack's Web page at Hogan & Hartson returned a Web configuration error. While this could be coincidental, it could also support the possibility of a recent or impending change of employment for Litvack.

A cached copy of the page notes that Litvack has been on the list of Southern California Super Lawyers from 2005 through 2008.

source: http://www.informationweek.com/news/internet/google/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=210600373

*sigh* sometimes I think this country will never be fixed.

nullvalu
09-09-2008, 11:58 AM
This is bad, bad, bad. If an anti-trust case against Google is won, it will open up a pandora's box of internet regulatory legislative bureaucracy.

acptulsa
09-09-2008, 12:00 PM
This is bad, bad, bad. If an anti-trust case against Google is won, it will open up a pandora's box of internet regulatory legislative bureaucracy.

And that's the only reason I can think of for this goofiness. A search engine can be a monopoly? How?

Fox McCloud
09-09-2008, 12:01 PM
It has to do with their ads and how they work, apparently....lame lame lame.

Johnnybags
09-09-2008, 12:05 PM
gets shaken down for a settlement, google will settle for billions and the FEDS will shake em down for it, period. Its "all about da money".

Uncle Emanuel Watkins
09-09-2008, 12:26 PM
It has to do with their ads and how they work, apparently....lame lame lame.

Don't the google adds pay by numbers of times people click on the cite?

angelatc
09-09-2008, 12:29 PM
IN the meantime, they're going to allow the cell phone market to sink into a single provider system.

HOLLYWOOD
09-09-2008, 01:13 PM
IN the meantime, they're going to allow the cell phone market to sink into a single provider system.

Of Course! Who do you think, made all those "DONATIONS" to the campaigns of the politicians that provided "IMMUNITY" to the communications carriers?

hand in hand... Corporate Congress of America

Google is not pre charged... it's Clicks and link payments...there's different "PAY PLANS" though almost all are charged on "CLICKS"

It's always about MONEY to the government: Da Money, but in the end ,where do you think the expenses of the U.S Government EXTORTION and FINES are paid by?

Yes, ALL OF US.