Uncle Emanuel Watkins
07-19-2008, 03:09 PM
In order to comprehend law and legal precedence, there must be something else to juxtapose it to. The corrupt power of tyranny considers this to be unlawfulness because it interprets power as nothing more than the ability to control. Our Founding Fathers established a greater power than this corrupt thinking in the two formal documents of The Declaration of Independence -- the people's legal divorce decree from that of tyranny -- and in The U.S. Constitution -- the people's legal marriage decree to that of a new proper government. They established this greater power of self evident truths and unalienable rights through the use of the science of natural law not through the use of a political science or the later cognizant ones.
While the greater power established by the U.S. Founding Fathers wins out through its clear propagation of the self-evident truths, the corrupt power that is 51% of tyranny continues to endure as the vain destructors of the remaining lessor 49. This type of corruption should be considered European.
As it has eroded towards this type of tyranny over the last few years, the present U.S. adminstration can be used as an example of the above phenomenon. This administration doesn't propagate the self evident truths as an agenda but has instead endured by fighting an endless battle against lessor tyrannies. Yet, the self evident truths and the unalienable rights reduce by the process of natural law to become indelibly imprinted on the very conscience of every human soul. So, we can either be happy, free American people; or, we can be dark clients to legal tyranny, slaves to legal precedents, and waste our time as fools to the endless responsibilities involved with teaching evil what it already knows.
While the self-evident truths reveal the proper order of how people should be governed -- "they (the people) are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness" -- the corrupt power of tyranny expresses no such order as unalienable rights but instead bind the people to grieving a life of endless burdens and responsibilities instead.
The proper order of our government is the one that tends to the happiness of its people first which is a method that will go on to empower them to be necessarily responsible. As apposed to the improper order of tyranny that requires people to shun their well being for the sake of responsibility. As exsistential crises have always been prevalent and shall always be so, with "global-warming- being one example of this, the implementation of the latter order is the very manifestation of hell because the people never find contentment.
The U.S. Founding Fathers established a better contented citizenship by establishing them 100% as being "created equal" through the use of the science of natural law. This scientific method also established an unalienable right in the people in regards to their contentment; while, the lessor tyrannies still go about even to this day attempting to manipulate their people through a more complex use of the political sciences and the later cognitive ones. This only provides the poor souls under such rule the possibility that they might one day be brought to a national dinner table where they will become full fledged citizens (Marxism is a good example of this).
In the process of establishing a nation, the U.S. Founding Fathers define three distinct powers as:
1) The corrupt power of tyranny.
2) The mediating power of the people.
3) The proper power of a new government.
The definition of the three distinct powers establishes a national dinner table where the mediating American people are its greatest seated power. At this table sits either the bright face of a tyrant with his corrupt power or the bright face of a king with his proper power.
The face in human culture represents a person's authority. So, when using the religion of Judaism as an example, the person with the brightest face sitting at their national dinner table would be the Father Abraham. In contrast, a worthless dog sits down when it is ashamed because dogs don't recognize themselves by their faces but by their behinds.
While I have used Socrates in many examples in this forum, I would like to take the time to use Jesus in one with the consideration that our American government is based on our Greek and Judea / Christian heritages.
There is an oddity in the book of Mark: chapter 11: versus 1 through 7 where Jesus sends two desciples to warn the people ahead that He, a person prophecized to have a brighter face than even Abraham, was about to enter into Jerusalem at Bethphage and Bethany. As one would expect, the people represented by masters and slaves alike came out to praise Him as was expected.
Yet, in the end, Jesus didn't turn out to be the person the people expected, because when Pilate asked them to pick between setting Him free or between setting a known mass murderer free, they chose the latter. The point being that the lowly Jesus was rejected as an outcaste worth even less than the worst man of that time.
This point is further expounded any time Jesus refers to Himself as, not the appropriate "Son of God" as one would expect but as the more meanial "Son of man." From the Jewish point of view, being a man of the Gentile nations was bad enough while being a worthless son of such was even lower.
One of the reasons African Americans can't get over the issue of slavery is that they haven't brought themselves to be enlightened by this point. In the West African culture as with every culture at one time or the other, there were worthless sons of men who got rejected as the lessor "untouchables" or "outcastes" not just by those who ruled as the master class but by those who served as the slave class as well.
So, we have established the bright face of the king at the national dinner table as well as his inverse -- the dark face of the untouchable. As responsible mediators seated at the national dinner table, it is our duty as American people to bind any wayward king to remain seated; while, in the meantime, it is also our duty to grant the necessary liberties to the discouraged untouchable to come to it. Any unwilling tyrant should be banished from the table by us altogether.
While the greater power established by the U.S. Founding Fathers wins out through its clear propagation of the self-evident truths, the corrupt power that is 51% of tyranny continues to endure as the vain destructors of the remaining lessor 49. This type of corruption should be considered European.
As it has eroded towards this type of tyranny over the last few years, the present U.S. adminstration can be used as an example of the above phenomenon. This administration doesn't propagate the self evident truths as an agenda but has instead endured by fighting an endless battle against lessor tyrannies. Yet, the self evident truths and the unalienable rights reduce by the process of natural law to become indelibly imprinted on the very conscience of every human soul. So, we can either be happy, free American people; or, we can be dark clients to legal tyranny, slaves to legal precedents, and waste our time as fools to the endless responsibilities involved with teaching evil what it already knows.
While the self-evident truths reveal the proper order of how people should be governed -- "they (the people) are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness" -- the corrupt power of tyranny expresses no such order as unalienable rights but instead bind the people to grieving a life of endless burdens and responsibilities instead.
The proper order of our government is the one that tends to the happiness of its people first which is a method that will go on to empower them to be necessarily responsible. As apposed to the improper order of tyranny that requires people to shun their well being for the sake of responsibility. As exsistential crises have always been prevalent and shall always be so, with "global-warming- being one example of this, the implementation of the latter order is the very manifestation of hell because the people never find contentment.
The U.S. Founding Fathers established a better contented citizenship by establishing them 100% as being "created equal" through the use of the science of natural law. This scientific method also established an unalienable right in the people in regards to their contentment; while, the lessor tyrannies still go about even to this day attempting to manipulate their people through a more complex use of the political sciences and the later cognitive ones. This only provides the poor souls under such rule the possibility that they might one day be brought to a national dinner table where they will become full fledged citizens (Marxism is a good example of this).
In the process of establishing a nation, the U.S. Founding Fathers define three distinct powers as:
1) The corrupt power of tyranny.
2) The mediating power of the people.
3) The proper power of a new government.
The definition of the three distinct powers establishes a national dinner table where the mediating American people are its greatest seated power. At this table sits either the bright face of a tyrant with his corrupt power or the bright face of a king with his proper power.
The face in human culture represents a person's authority. So, when using the religion of Judaism as an example, the person with the brightest face sitting at their national dinner table would be the Father Abraham. In contrast, a worthless dog sits down when it is ashamed because dogs don't recognize themselves by their faces but by their behinds.
While I have used Socrates in many examples in this forum, I would like to take the time to use Jesus in one with the consideration that our American government is based on our Greek and Judea / Christian heritages.
There is an oddity in the book of Mark: chapter 11: versus 1 through 7 where Jesus sends two desciples to warn the people ahead that He, a person prophecized to have a brighter face than even Abraham, was about to enter into Jerusalem at Bethphage and Bethany. As one would expect, the people represented by masters and slaves alike came out to praise Him as was expected.
Yet, in the end, Jesus didn't turn out to be the person the people expected, because when Pilate asked them to pick between setting Him free or between setting a known mass murderer free, they chose the latter. The point being that the lowly Jesus was rejected as an outcaste worth even less than the worst man of that time.
This point is further expounded any time Jesus refers to Himself as, not the appropriate "Son of God" as one would expect but as the more meanial "Son of man." From the Jewish point of view, being a man of the Gentile nations was bad enough while being a worthless son of such was even lower.
One of the reasons African Americans can't get over the issue of slavery is that they haven't brought themselves to be enlightened by this point. In the West African culture as with every culture at one time or the other, there were worthless sons of men who got rejected as the lessor "untouchables" or "outcastes" not just by those who ruled as the master class but by those who served as the slave class as well.
So, we have established the bright face of the king at the national dinner table as well as his inverse -- the dark face of the untouchable. As responsible mediators seated at the national dinner table, it is our duty as American people to bind any wayward king to remain seated; while, in the meantime, it is also our duty to grant the necessary liberties to the discouraged untouchable to come to it. Any unwilling tyrant should be banished from the table by us altogether.