View Full Version : Importance of Bob Barr getting into the debates
nbhadja
07-15-2008, 11:57 PM
It is VERY important that Barr get into the debates. I heard that most debates will require 15% of the vote in their polls (10% for google's debate though).
The presidential debates are watched by many more people than the republican primaries are.
The last time a non neocon or neoliberal got into the presidential debates it was Perot. And we saw how Perot's popularity and vote percent exploded after the nation watched him in the debate (and of course the libretarian message would greatly increase in popularity)
It really was not shocking, he was debating with Bush Sr and Bill Clinton, they both are retards.
It really would not be shocking if Barr's popularity rapidly moves up if he could get that 15% poll vote and enter the debate. McCain and Obama are as retarded as Bush Sr and Clinton were.
Joseph Hart
07-16-2008, 12:00 AM
Bob Barrf
http://i227.photobucket.com/albums/dd129/Organjic/Barr2.jpg
Write in Ron Paul!
nbhadja
07-16-2008, 12:04 AM
Bob Barrf
http://i227.photobucket.com/albums/dd129/Organjic/Barr2.jpg
Write in Ron Paul!
Curious to why you hate Bob Barr? His voting record since he became a Libertarian has been great and Ron Paul like.
Writing in Ron Paul is like not voting. They will not be counted at all, just thrown away.
Joseph Hart
07-16-2008, 12:05 AM
Curious to why you hate Bob Barr? His voting record since he became a Libertarian has been great and Ron Paul like.
Writing in Ron Paul is like not voting. They will not be counted at all, just thrown away.
Its not worth the chance...
http://i227.photobucket.com/albums/dd129/Organjic/Barr3.jpg
nbhadja
07-16-2008, 12:07 AM
Why is it not worth the chance? It is a huge opportunity to spread the Libertarian message. Barr is already polling at 6 percent nationally.
Writing in Ron Paul (or anyone) is a huge waste.
Joseph Hart
07-16-2008, 12:07 AM
Watch this... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aixGdgdnfOk
http://i227.photobucket.com/albums/dd129/Organjic/Barr1.jpg
Joseph Hart
07-16-2008, 12:08 AM
Why is it not worth the chance? It is a huge opportunity to spread the Libertarian message. Barr is already polling at 6 percent nationally.
Writing in Ron Paul (or anyone) is a huge waste.
Don't tell me that its a waste. I'm voting from my heart. I will only vote Chuck Baldwin if Ron Paul endorses him and I do not think he will.
nbhadja
07-16-2008, 12:10 AM
Watch this... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aixGdgdnfOk
http://i227.photobucket.com/albums/dd129/Organjic/Barr1.jpg
He has changed his philosphy since he voted for them. He switched to Libratarian and he has voted like a libratarian ever since.
He is not like say Obama who says he is antiwar but votes for war. Barr's voting backs up his philosophy change.
That clip talks about his voting record before he switched.
The revolution is built from alot of ex-neocons like me. Not everyone is a libertarian from the day they are born.
nbhadja
07-16-2008, 12:18 AM
Don't tell me that its a waste. I'm voting from my heart. I will only vote Chuck Baldwin if Ron Paul endorses him and I do not think he will.
The movement is more than about one man (Ron Paul). He himself has said that several times.
revolutionary8
07-16-2008, 12:25 AM
http://img179.imageshack.us/img179/2241/facepalm2ic7copyrl2.jpg
Join The Paul Side
07-16-2008, 12:26 AM
Bob Barrf
http://i227.photobucket.com/albums/dd129/Organjic/Barr2.jpg
Write in Ron Paul!
I guess you must prefer a McBama or O'Cain presidency. :eek:
AJ Antimony
07-16-2008, 12:26 AM
Joseph, I'm sorry, but you really are a complete moron for wanting to write in Paul and for not seeing the opportunity of SPREADING OUR MESSAGE if Barr makes the debates.
EDIT: I don't like Barr too much for his voting record but that's completely irrelevant because he will not win the election. All that matters is the debates and even if he's lying about it, talking about libertarian views on those debates will wake up MANY people to the philosophy of freedom. That's the only reason I support him.
revolutionary8
07-16-2008, 12:27 AM
Its not worth the chance...
http://i227.photobucket.com/albums/dd129/Organjic/Barr3.jpg
I will give it to Barr on this one, at least it isn't the Bohemian Grove "Shocker Handshake".
http://www.shockerpics.com/blog/wp-content/images/shocker-hand.png
see ya on the flip side. :D
revolutionary8
07-16-2008, 12:33 AM
I guess you must prefer a McBama or O'Cain presidency. :eek:
Do you really believe that "we" have a choice in the matter in regards to the National Election?
All Politics is local, and all change comes from within.
syborius
07-16-2008, 12:33 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ag-kkq_vKHA&eurl=http://blog.bobbarr2008.com/2008/07/14/video-barr-on-cavuto/
Barr, a "true libertarian" advocating government intervention in the Fannie Mae subprime mess. Yes Bob, you're right, I don't own a home, but I, and every other citizen in the united states should pay for this mess that the government and these crooked brokers created with more bail-outs, clearly that is the libertarian thing to do, and to say. In a real free market system it should only be the investors and the company that takes the hit, but no, in this case you still have execs walking away with millions in golden parachutes, and YOU, YOU will pay for it. Bob Barr is of course in agreement as any good big government neocon, patriot act traitor would be.
Joseph Hart
07-16-2008, 12:38 AM
Do you really believe that "we" have a choice in the matter in regards to the National Election?
All Politics is local, and all change comes from within.
Thank you! Thats why I'm helping local politics get in office, one way or another.
Joseph Hart
07-16-2008, 12:39 AM
I support the message, and Barr did "wake up" before I ever did... BUT! HE has been in politics longer so this gives me an edge. I'm 23.
revolutionary8
07-16-2008, 12:41 AM
I support the message, and Barr did "wake up" before I ever did... BUT! HE has been in politics longer so this gives me an edge. I'm 23.
He shoulda known better. Bottom line.
You, have an advantage, as you are either a)smarter than him or b)ethically/morally superior to him.
Pick one.
eta-
or both. :)
sidster
07-16-2008, 01:05 AM
Curious to why you hate Bob Barr? His voting record since he became a Libertarian has been great
At least you got that part right. After he was booted out
of Congress his voting record "has been GREAT" cause he's
not been voting and further eroding our liberties.
sidster
07-16-2008, 01:07 AM
Joseph, I'm sorry, but you really are a complete moron for wanting to write in Paul and for not seeing the opportunity of SPREADING OUR MESSAGE if Barr makes the debates.
With all due respect, I would say you're the moron if you really
think barr's message is anything like Ron Paul's message.
revolutionary8
07-16-2008, 01:07 AM
his voting record "has been GREAT" cause he's
not been voting
yep. thatta bout sums it up. :D
mrchubbs
07-16-2008, 01:16 AM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ag-kkq_vKHA&eurl=http://blog.bobbarr2008.com/2008/07/14/video-barr-on-cavuto/
Barr, a "true libertarian" advocating government intervention in the Fannie Mae subprime mess. Yes Bob, you're right, I don't own a home, but I, and every other citizen in the united states should pay for this mess that the government and these crooked brokers created with more bail-outs, clearly that is the libertarian thing to do, and to say. In a real free market system it should only be the investors and the company that takes the hit, but no, in this case you still have execs walking away with millions in golden parachutes, and YOU, YOU will pay for it. Bob Barr is of course in agreement as any good big government neocon, patriot act traitor would be.
Yes, he wants to "intervene" and privatize FM and FM....
http://www.bobbarr2008.com/press/press-releases/56/bob-barr-says-privatize-fannie-mae-and-freddie-mac-end-government-subsidies/
Sounds good to me.
revolutionary8
07-16-2008, 01:18 AM
Yes, he wants to "intervene" and privatize FM and FM....
http://www.bobbarr2008.com/press/press-releases/56/bob-barr-says-privatize-fannie-mae-and-freddie-mac-end-government-subsidies/
Sounds good to me.
Yes, "FM" needs all the "charity" and "Socialism" they can get, on top of being tax free. :cool:
mrchubbs,
map me out the ripple effect/affect and we can call it even. deal?
tonesforjonesbones
07-16-2008, 03:14 AM
I'm wondering what the average age of posters on this forum are. I'd say ..er...about 23. <eyeroll> tones
Alex Libman
07-16-2008, 03:43 AM
If Bob Barr makes it into the prime-time televised debates with the McBamas, the impact of that would be huge! Tee vee is the ultimate reality filter for most of this country, and those 20+ million voters (not counting the non-voters) who score "libertarian" on the Nolan Chart will finally have a viable political identity they can recognize!
speciallyblend
07-16-2008, 05:38 AM
I will vote for BARR and my wife will to and many others in Colorado:), as most have said writing in Ron Paul is a waste, unless Ron Paul actually runs. I will be supporting the LP and Barr and i still say if we want the movement to be bigger, Ron Paul and US better do something like unify the movement with the lp/cp/republicans/dems and independents.... Sept 2nd CFL ,better be something BIG, LIKE UNIFYING the movement by joining the cp/lp and ron paul republicans and dems and independents which would easily pass the 20% mark if they let go of their egos for the movement which is bigger then the lp/cp itself.... WE CAN ONLY HOPE SEPT 2nd will be bigger then funding candidates and organizing , RON PAUL MAKE IT HAPPEN, LP MAKE IT HAPPEN, CP MAKE IT HAPPEN,WE MUST MAKE IT HAPPEN or we will be back to square 1 after the ELECTION, MY GOD PEOPLE WTF is UP , WE MUST UNIFY THE PARTIES INTO ONE NEW BRAND NAME!!!!!! WE MUST!!!! PLEASE HEAR THIS PLEA
IF WE TRULY WANT TO WIN ,THEN I SUGGEST ROOT STEP DOWN AND RON PAUL RUNS WITH BARR OR VICE VERSA
I'm starting to think in the next 2 yrs , I will be leaving the republican party and help the gop die quicker....
Truth Warrior
07-16-2008, 06:33 AM
Importance? ZERO! <IMHO>
speciallyblend
07-16-2008, 06:51 AM
Importance? ZERO! <IMHO>
importance 0? or are you talking the fm???. barr in the debates will be huge ,look if it wasn't for a 3rd party candidate harry browne many years ago. i would of never listened to Ron Paul ,so i truly think barr being in the debates will open many eyes and never say never on poll numbers ,if we get barr into the debates, then many more people will have their eyes opened and all the folks that feel they have no voice will be energized, never say never, so i assume you meant 0 on the fm subject and not the debates. Barr is gonna hand obama and mccain their asses on a silver platter in a debate ,will be great ,let's get barrr in the debate or unify the parties under a new platform , we must do something!!!
Truth Warrior
07-16-2008, 07:01 AM
importance 0? or are you talking the fm???. barr in the debates will be huge ,look if it wasn't for a 3rd party candidate harry browne many years ago. i would of never listened to Ron Paul ,so i truly think barr being in the debates will open many eyes and never say never on poll numbers ,if we get barr into the debates, then many more people will have their eyes opened and all the folks that feel they have no voice will be energized, never say never, so i assume you meant 0 on the fm subject and not the debates. Barr is gonna hand obama and mccain their asses on a silver platter in a debate ,will be great ,let's get barrr in the debate or unify the parties under a new platform , we must do something!!!
You're just dreamin'.<IMHO> :p
speciallyblend
07-16-2008, 07:25 AM
You're just dreamin'.<IMHO> :p
we should just quit the revolution since if it wasn't for me watching a 3rd party debate and opening my eyes i wouldn't even be in the ron paul movement,so what your saying is give up and do not try to get minds opened and educated so why bother right?? that is basically what your trying to say, why bother ,if you do not think barr is a good thing in the debate ,then why are you even here in this forums really ,are you dreaming??? ,to think people will not listen to barr or more debates that are opened up by discussing issues the dem and rep will not ,then i would have to say your dreaming. many wouldn't even be here if it wasn't for a 3rd party opening your eyes ,hell so what your saying is ron paul should of never run in 1988 or this year either.. not sure what your saying since all you have said is your dreaming and 0 , hmmmm not sure what your trying to say,other then why try,why are you here again to divide us or to be with us, if you have this attitude why even bother posting here. We have goals and it seems you want none of the goals to happen,it must come from all angles
who are you voting for ?????? and why would you not want barr in the debate??? really what positives do you have to offer other then your dreaming and 0
speciallyblend
07-16-2008, 07:34 AM
You're just dreamin'.<IMHO> :p
wtf are you on, obama/mccain fan?? look the truth has nothing to do with your false id. THE TRUTH is i met harry browne many years ago and that is the reason i was open to ron paul, the truth is you cannot predict the future. The truth is you know nothing if you think barr will not convert people then your denying the truth,if i were you, id change your id to falsetruth. I am a prime example of TRUTH, harry browne opened my eyes and thats why im part of the revolution, if it wasn't for the truth. then ron pauls movement wouldn't be here and this forum wouldnt even exist , the truth is your in a depression and need to get your ass off of the depression or just give up and go away since you have no truth to stand for.. why are you here ??? to be negative and mock people, seems like it, your a perfect person to join the mccain bandwagon good luck they just love negative attitudes like yours ,you would be welcome there
you cannot handle the truth, sorry had to use it, the truth is barr is gonna make mccain lose colorado and i will be very happy to pull the lever for BOB BARR and i will start a group called Colorado Republicans for BOB BARR, we are sending a strong message from many angles to the gop, THAT'S THE TRUTH , are you with us or against us? yep stole bushes crappy line but that's the truth!!!!!! so to say barr has no impact is a total lie, he will have a huge impact if he is in the debates
tonesforjonesbones
07-16-2008, 08:37 AM
Specialty..I agree with you! My mother, who is determined to vote for MccAin..ONLY to block Obama, watched Bob Barr's interview on Cspan with me. She said "I'd really like to see him in the debates". I'm telling ya'll on this thread..Bob Barr RESONATES with those conservatives who do not like MCCAIN because my mom is ONE OF THEM..she's 71 years old. They don't think like us...Bob Barr's being in the CIA , and pushing Clinton's impeachment, and his dealings with the Patriot act etc...MEANS SOMETHING to those people!!! They consider that an ACCOMPLISHMENT..and they have respect for it. You MUST realize what audience you are targeting. Once you get them to listen to him...THEN we gently pull them over to our way of thinking. You just can't bulldoze people who have believed a certain way all their lives...you must be able to give them something they can grasp..and then work on the rest of it. Common sense ...anarchy won't work with those we are trying to attract. TONES
Andrew-Austin
07-16-2008, 08:56 AM
Don't tell me that its a waste. I'm voting from my heart. I will only vote Chuck Baldwin if Ron Paul endorses him and I do not think he will.
Why don't you stop beinng so silly, and for the time being support Barr getting into the debates.... You can write in Paul later in order to have your little moment of reverie.
This was my response to someone equally stubborn and silly in another thread:
Do you think Barr can even get elected? I mean fuck of course that is what Barr supporters would ideally like in a perfect world, but most Barr supporters I think know how unrealistic that is....
For just a moment lets focus on the present and whats right around the corner:
-Barr supporters want to see him get 10% in the polls nationally
-so he can participate in debates with McBama.
-For the run of his present campagin, Barr HAS been preaching Libertarian ideals.
-Therefor he would not just flip-flop in a debate with McBama, but would counter their big government statist ideas with Libertarian ones.
Don't you want average Americans to learn that there is an alternative to runaway spending, high taxes, crazy interventionist foreign policy, etc? Or do you want to see Obama and McCain stand alone on a stage, contesting minor details about their plans to further aggrandize the state and fuck all of us over?
Just picture that for me. McCain looking like a baboon and pretending to be conservative, Obama pretending to stand for change and preaching the virtues of socialism.
To most Americans, these two men will seem to be only two routes American can take. Now what would it look like if Barr entered the picture, and presented the case of limited government and maximum liberty?
Stop trying to preemptively crap all over Barr, support him getting into the debates and see what you think of him then. There is value in opening up the two party system up to a third party.
G-Wohl
07-16-2008, 10:12 AM
With all due respect, I would say you're the moron if you really
think barr's message is anything like Ron Paul's message.
OK then, let's compare..
Pornography, at best, is a distortion of the true nature of sex created by God for the procreative union between one man and one woman in the holy bonds of matrimony, and at worst, is a destructive element of society resulting in significant and real emotional, physical, spiritual and financial costs to individuals, families and communities. We call on our local, state and federal governments to uphold our cherished First Amendment right to free speech by vigorously enforcing our laws against obscenity to maintain a degree of separation between that which is truly speech and that which only seeks to distort and destroy.
Gambling promotes an increase in crime, destruction of family values, and a decline in the moral fiber of our country. We are opposed to government sponsorship, involvement in, or promotion of gambling, such as lotteries, or subsidization of Native American casinos in the name of economic development.
We affirm the value of the father and the mother in the home, and we oppose efforts to legalize adoption of children by homosexual singles or couples.
This is Chuck Baldwin's philosophy - tell me how these statements represent Ron Paul's ideology of freedom and liberty. Please, tell me.
tonesforjonesbones
07-16-2008, 10:15 AM
Why are ya'll so hung up on moral issues rather than political issues? Bob Barr doens' t talk about porn or gambling...don't you think there are more important issues at hand..like wars, economy, and losing our freedom daily? I don't get it..tones
tonesforjonesbones
07-16-2008, 10:16 AM
Specialty..I agree with you! My mother, who is determined to vote for MccAin..ONLY to block Obama, watched Bob Barr's interview on Cspan with me. She said "I'd really like to see him in the debates". I'm telling ya'll on this thread..Bob Barr RESONATES with those conservatives who do not like MCCAIN because my mom is ONE OF THEM..she's 71 years old. They don't think like us...Bob Barr's being in the CIA , and pushing Clinton's impeachment, and his dealings with the Patriot act etc...MEANS SOMETHING to those people!!! They consider that an ACCOMPLISHMENT..and they have respect for it. You MUST realize what audience you are targeting. Once you get them to listen to him...THEN we gently pull them over to our way of thinking. You just can't bulldoze people who have believed a certain way all their lives...you must be able to give them something they can grasp..and then work on the rest of it. Common sense ...anarchy won't work with those we are trying to attract. TONES
qh4dotcom
07-16-2008, 10:21 AM
Joseph, I'm sorry, but you really are a complete moron for wanting to write in Paul and for not seeing the opportunity of SPREADING OUR MESSAGE if Barr makes the debates.
EDIT: I don't like Barr too much for his voting record but that's completely irrelevant because he will not win the election. All that matters is the debates and even if he's lying about it, talking about libertarian views on those debates will wake up MANY people to the philosophy of freedom. That's the only reason I support him.
Well said
I guess all the Barr haters who have posted on this thread must want the millions who will be watching the debates to be brainwashed by Obama and McCain's big government trash talk and they must not want someone talking about liberty and other Ron Paul principles.
tonesforjonesbones
07-16-2008, 10:26 AM
I think it's part ego and part spite. tones
familydog
07-16-2008, 10:28 AM
OK then, let's compare..
This is Chuck Baldwin's philosophy - tell me how these statements represent Ron Paul's ideology of freedom and liberty. Please, tell me.
To be fair, that is the Constitution Party philosophy.
If you want to discredit Baldwin, next time try quoting him instead of his party.
Candidates can differ from their party's platform. Bob Barr does, Ron Paul did. Let's at least be honest.
speciallyblend
07-16-2008, 11:22 AM
if we could only unite the cp/lp under a new platform with the ron paul republicans and dems and independents, then you now have a REAL 3rd Party with alot of clout and possibly polling over 15-25% and even higher, so I'M EXPECTING SOMETHING REALLY BIG SEPT 2nd;) I expect ron paul and barr and baldwin to start talking and the leaders of the 2 parties(lp/cp) to swallow their pride and see a NEW PLATFORM, it would explode across america, PLEASE I BEG OF YOU!!!PLEASE, MAKE IT HAPPEN sigh...
A NEW PLATFORM, A NEW PARTY, united under a platform that crosses all party lines, Liberty Party or something, WE NEED A NEW BRAND NAME , with this NEW PARTY , i say it is possible, ron paul needs to start bumpin some heads in the lp/cp and wake them up!!!!
LibertyIn08
07-16-2008, 11:57 AM
if we could only unite the cp/lp under a new platform with the ron paul republicans and dems and independents, then you now have a REAL 3rd Party with alot of clout and possibly polling over 15-25% and even higher, so I'M EXPECTING SOMETHING REALLY BIG SEPT 2nd;) I expect ron paul and barr and baldwin to start talking and the leaders of the 2 parties(lp/cp) to swallow their pride and see a NEW PLATFORM, it would explode across america, PLEASE I BEG OF YOU!!!PLEASE, MAKE IT HAPPEN sigh...
A NEW PLATFORM, A NEW PARTY, united under a platform that crosses all party lines, Liberty Party or something, WE NEED A NEW BRAND NAME , with this NEW PARTY , i say it is possible, ron paul needs to start bumpin some heads in the lp/cp and wake them up!!!!
I wouldn't hold your breath over such a concession occurring.
Indy4Chng
07-16-2008, 12:06 PM
Its not worth the chance...
http://i227.photobucket.com/albums/dd129/Organjic/Barr3.jpg
Yes he might let a libertarian principle be discussed in national debates. We wouldn't want that, lets just keep the topics to Republicrat ideas, cause they are so great and can save our country. What is the harm of him getting into the debates?
speciallyblend
07-16-2008, 12:22 PM
I wouldn't hold your breath over such a concession occurring.
im just saying if they would just think sigh ,maybe:mad:
ARealConservative
07-16-2008, 12:26 PM
useful idiots
AJ Antimony
07-16-2008, 12:27 PM
With all due respect, I would say you're the moron if you really
think barr's message is anything like Ron Paul's message.
Barr's message--the words-- is pretty much identical to Paul's. They certainly put emphasis on different areas but they speak the same language.
Get immediately out of Iraq. Get out of rest of world. No more income tax. More liberty. More liberty. More liberty. Freedom too. Lower taxes. Sound money. States' rights. The Constitution. Pro-life. Nonintervention.
Paul put emphasis on foreign policy and monetary policy. Barr has been putting emphasis on liberty in general in order to appeal to more people.
Go around town and ask people about Ron Paul... I bet most of them will tell you "Oh yeah! I really liked him.... but I just couldn't vote for him because of his one stance on.. blah blah blah"
As a matter of fact, my aunt told me she agreed Ron Paul is a very smart guy and has great views on this country's problems, but she said she didn't like his stance on federal highways. Are you serious?
Barr, with his dumbed down libertarianism will get those same naive people to say "Yeah, we've lost lots of our freedoms and need them back" as opposed to "Abolish the Fed? Bring every one of our troops home? That's wayyyy too kooky and radical for me!"
They ought to let me moderate a debate. I will publicly embarrass all the participants to such a degree that the next President would enter the office with Bush approval ratings.
ARealConservative
07-16-2008, 12:34 PM
They ought to let me moderate a debate. I will publicly embarrass all the participants to such a degree that the next President would enter the office with Bush approval ratings.
:rolleyes:
familydog
07-16-2008, 12:35 PM
They ought to let me moderate a debate. I will publicly embarrass all the participants to such a degree that the next President would enter the office with Bush approval ratings.
I'd watch that! ;)
Truth Warrior
07-16-2008, 12:36 PM
wtf are you on, obama/mccain fan?? look the truth has nothing to do with your false id. THE TRUTH is i met harry browne many years ago and that is the reason i was open to ron paul, the truth is you cannot predict the future. The truth is you know nothing if you think barr will not convert people then your denying the truth,if i were you, id change your id to falsetruth. I am a prime example of TRUTH, harry browne opened my eyes and thats why im part of the revolution, if it wasn't for the truth. then ron pauls movement wouldn't be here and this forum wouldnt even exist , the truth is your in a depression and need to get your ass off of the depression or just give up and go away since you have no truth to stand for.. why are you here ??? to be negative and mock people, seems like it, your a perfect person to join the mccain bandwagon good luck they just love negative attitudes like yours ,you would be welcome there
you cannot handle the truth, sorry had to use it, the truth is barr is gonna make mccain lose colorado and i will be very happy to pull the lever for BOB BARR and i will start a group called Colorado Republicans for BOB BARR, we are sending a strong message from many angles to the gop, THAT'S THE TRUTH , are you with us or against us? yep stole bushes crappy line but that's the truth!!!!!! so to say barr has no impact is a total lie, he will have a huge impact if he is in the debates
Nope, just call 'em like I see them. More than enough with the fantasy illusions.
Try REALITY!!!
I'd watch that! ;)
I honestly think that by allowing biased moderators to guide the flow of information, we do end up with two hacks speaking about issues that have no bearing on the source of the problems in this country.
In respect to my friends here, my first question would be:
Candidates for President of the United States of America, what is your justification for the continued existence of the Federal Reserve System and the $200 Billion in Federal Notes held out of circulation, despite publishing a total of $982 Billion in liabilities?
The_Orlonater
07-16-2008, 12:57 PM
Ugh, Barr haters...
I'm not even going to go through this conversation again.
:(:confused::mad:
Ugh, Barr haters...
I'm not even going to go through this conversation again.
:(:confused::mad:
I have personal and political reasons to hate Bob Barr...
G-Wohl
07-16-2008, 02:07 PM
To be fair, that is the Constitution Party philosophy.
If you want to discredit Baldwin, next time try quoting him instead of his party.
Candidates can differ from their party's platform. Bob Barr does, Ron Paul did. Let's at least be honest.
How do Bob Barr's present views differ from that of the Libertarian Party?
Ron Paul's positions WERE the views of the Republican Party.
Chuck Baldwin is practically the SPOKESPERSON of the Constitution Party, and has been for a long time.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.3 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.