PDA

View Full Version : Ross Perot launches perotcharts.com




benny215
06-15-2008, 04:33 PM
Perot created this site, just went up today. Lots of good graphs a charts regarding national deficit and government spending. Just saw this pretty interesting although its nothing new.

The Good Doctor
06-15-2008, 04:42 PM
Interesting. I think the Campaign for Liberty should focus on these things as well.

RSLudlum
06-15-2008, 04:47 PM
thanx

crusader
06-15-2008, 05:18 PM
Someone needs to go viral with this to non-paul supporters, it will get them thinking and looking for a candidate that will address these issues.

clintontj72
06-15-2008, 05:55 PM
I wonder if Perot is thinking about a last minute run against tweedle dee and tweedle dum?

USAFCapt
06-15-2008, 06:49 PM
love it. clear, concise; I can see why even some of the sheeple voted for him in droves back in '92.

ItsTime
06-15-2008, 06:55 PM
scary

http://perotcharts.com/category/challenges-charts/page/5/

Primbs
06-15-2008, 06:56 PM
Somebody needed to do it.

Sally08
06-15-2008, 06:59 PM
http://www.star-telegram.com/245/story/700148.html
Posted on Sun, Jun. 15, 2008

Ross Perot's back - and fortunately, he's got his charts

By David Broder
The Washington Post

buttonpusher
06-15-2008, 07:18 PM
What are the chances that Barr will exceed Perot's numbers in 1992? I think pretty doggone good...

<quote from wikipedia>
Electoral history
United States presidential election, 1992

Bill Clinton/Al Gore (D) - 44,909,806 (43.0%) and 370 electoral votes (32 states and D.C. carried)
George H. W. Bush/Dan Quayle (R) (Inc.) - 39,104,550 (37.4%) and 168 electoral votes (18 states carried)
Ross Perot/James Stockdale (I) - 19,743,821 (18.9%) and 0 electoral votes
Andre Marrou/Nancy Lord (L) - 290,087 (0.3%) and 0 electoral votes
United States presidential election, 1996

Bill Clinton/Al Gore (D) (Inc.) - 47,400,125 (49.2%) and 379 electoral votes (31 states and D.C. carried)
Bob Dole/Jack Kemp (R) - 39,198,755 (40.7%) and 159 electoral votes (19 states carried)
Ross Perot/Pat Choate (Ref.) - 8,085,402 (8.8%) and 0 electoral votes
<end quote>

slacker921
06-15-2008, 07:31 PM
What are the chances that Barr will exceed Perot's numbers in 1992? I think pretty doggone good...

If Barr had a dozen or more people like Perot dumping money into PACs to help his campaign.. and if Barr had a real campaign staff with experience in national elections.. and a campaign staff who were serious about trying to win... then it might happen. But they'd have to start now.

Odds of him actually winning? Very slim... the duopoly owns the media.

electronicmaji
06-15-2008, 07:53 PM
Barr Beating Perot?

Never. Perot's run was a miracle in itself and the product of 100s of millions in spending.

Only a billionaire could ever do a run as succesful again.

werdd
06-15-2008, 08:47 PM
should of elected ross. Proof that america is retarded.

N13
06-15-2008, 09:09 PM
Those Ross the Boss Charts kick ass.

Mesogen
06-15-2008, 09:54 PM
I think those charts need to be inflation adjusted to be more accurate.

The one that doesn't need it is the total national debt.

But "held by the public"?
Fuck you. I didn't authorize that spending.
I owe nothing.

hypnagogue
06-15-2008, 10:03 PM
Damn good info. This is the kind of information the public needs to be provided with.

angelatc
06-15-2008, 10:20 PM
Barr Beating Perot?

Never. Perot's run was a miracle in itself and the product of 100s of millions in spending.

Only a billionaire could ever do a run as successful again.

Perot would have been far more successful if he hadn't self-imploded near the end.

Pauls' Revere
06-15-2008, 10:38 PM
campaigning or showing us charts? It would be interesting if there was a Paul/Perot ticket.
Just had a crazy thought, with Perots $$ and Pauls' following could they pull it off and do a third party run?!? Is it to late as far as some rules go whatever they may be (not versed in campaign laws) so would it in theory be possible?

LibertiORDeth
06-15-2008, 11:20 PM
campaigning or showing us charts? It would be interesting if there was a Paul/Perot ticket.
Just had a crazy thought, with Perots $$ and Pauls' following could they pull it off and do a third party run?!? Is it to late as far as some rules go whatever they may be (not versed in campaign laws) so would it in theory be possible?

No point thinking about it, we know what the Good Doctor says about it.

Matt Collins
06-16-2008, 12:35 AM
Perot would have been far more successful if he hadn't self-imploded near the end.Someone has told me that Perot was apparently a close friend of the Clintons...whether or not there is any merit to that story I don't honestly know.

Matt Collins
06-16-2008, 12:36 AM
Never. Perot's run was a miracle in itself and the product of 100s of millions in spending.And even with Perot's BILLIONS of dollars he was unable to gain ballot access in all 50 states.

ingrid
06-16-2008, 02:11 AM
Thanks for posting this.

Does anyone know where you can watch his old infomercials? I liked him when I was a little girl, but I haven't been able to find them online. Curious to watch them now and to see what I think.

I liked how he made things easy to understand and entertaining. I remember he used to call his pointer, his "voodoo stick." LOL

Truth Warrior
06-16-2008, 05:22 AM
Good site find! ;)

Thanks! :)

NewFederalist
06-16-2008, 05:36 AM
And even with Perot's BILLIONS of dollars he was unable to gain ballot access in all 50 states.

Check out the results of both 1992 and 1996. Perot WAS on the ballot in all 50 states plus DC both times. Money can make it happen if the deadlines are not missed. Many deadlines are already past now.