PDA

View Full Version : Why isn't CNN covering Montana primary?




Sandra
06-03-2008, 07:50 PM
Not even the website. Just wondering.

txrep
06-03-2008, 08:06 PM
Because the MT Republican race was several months ago and Romney won it.

SnappleLlama
06-03-2008, 08:08 PM
What does this mean, then?

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21229217

I have no idea!!

Sandra
06-03-2008, 08:13 PM
Because the MT Republican race was several months ago and Romney won it.


That was the caucus. Tonight is the primary.

crazyfingers
06-03-2008, 08:19 PM
http://www.foxnews.com/ has the results

I don't know what the deal is with Montana. It says 0% reporting but is showing results.

rockandrollsouls
06-03-2008, 09:02 PM
This is a pretty huge deal...Ron is really catching on. Montana and South Dakota both have relatively strong numbers. The message is spreading.

Sandra
06-03-2008, 09:12 PM
He's at 17% in Montana. It looks as though they were doing a selective precinct count to keep McCain ahead until bedtime then they will release the rest of the numbers overnight, but, too late to make the morning papers.

SnappleLlama
06-03-2008, 09:13 PM
COME ON, RON!! We're still here, ready for a revolution!!

scandinaviany3
06-03-2008, 09:43 PM
http://sos.mt.gov/ELB/elections/2008/primary/StatewideRaces/President/index.asp

strange how fox results has larger number than the state of montana

tangent4ronpaul
06-03-2008, 10:03 PM
oops - 25% was the caucuses... - my bad....

yeah nada up on CNN - weird...

-n

I Am Weasel
06-04-2008, 09:57 AM
with 15 - 20% support in all these states, doesn't he have to be allowed on the ballot?

Sandra
06-04-2008, 10:15 AM
Anybody in Montana checking on precinct counts? There had to be more RP votes in Yellowstone County. They seem so darned anti McCain there too.

Mahkato
06-04-2008, 10:18 AM
with 15 - 20% support in all these states, doesn't he have to be allowed on the ballot?

It's a lot easier to have 15-20% of the votes when there are only two people on the ballot.