PDA

View Full Version : Childhood lead exposure can predict criminality




yongrel
05-28-2008, 11:00 AM
Childhood lead exposure can predict criminality
01:00 28 May 2008
NewScientist.com news service
Alison Motluk
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn13989-childhood-lead-exposure-can-predict-criminality.html?DCMP=ILC-hmts&nsref=news8_head_dn13989

Children exposed to lead early in life are more likely to be in trouble with the law as adults.

Lead contamination most often arises from the dust and soil, but can also come from lead water pipes or environmental pollution. Studies have consistently found associations between lead exposure in childhood and subsequent antisocial behaviour, but there have always been problems in determining causality.

Now Kim Dietrich at the University of Cincinnati College of Medicine and his colleagues have looked prospectively at how lead levels affect the risk of being arrested in adulthood. They recruited 250 pregnant women from a poor lead-contaminated inner-city district in Cincinnati.

The researchers took blood samples from the women early in pregnancy, then sampled the blood of the children four times a year till age 5, and then twice a year until they were about 7 years old.

Increased arrests
Years later, the researchers checked public records to see if their subjects had been arrested since reaching the age of 18, and if so, how many times and for what. Independent reviewers coded them into categories, such as violent offences, drug offences and fraud.

After controlling for factors including maternal IQ, maternal arrest rates, parenting style and socioeconomic factors, they found that prenatal and childhood lead concentrations in the blood predicted likelihood of adult arrest.

A 5 microgram/decilitre increment in average childhood blood lead level, for instance, increased the rate of arrest for violent crimes by 26%. And high prenatal blood levels predicted the total number of adult arrests.

Dose-dependent effect
Lead can interfere with the brain by impairing synapse formation and disrupting neurotransmitters, such as dopamine and serotonin. It also appears to permanently alter brain structure.

In a companion study, the researchers used magnetic resonance imaging to look at the brains of some of these same individuals.

They found that, here too, lead had a dose-dependent effect – the more lead a person had been exposed to as a child, the smaller the brain regions in frontal areas. These are regions involved in judgement, emotional regulation and impulse control, among other things.

"It's time to blame lead," says Dietrich.

Preventable risk
"Even if the contribution of lead to arrest risk is small," points out David Bellinger, at Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, US, in a comment on the paper, "it has a special status in that, in contrast to most other known risk factors for criminality, we know full well how to prevent it."

The Centers for Disease Control says that blood levels above 10 micrograms are unsafe. The good news is that both childhood blood lead levels and crime have declined in the US.

In Ohio, for instance, where this study was conducted, only 2.3% of children under age 6 had blood lead levels exceeding CDC recommendations in 2006, compared with 16.6% of children in 1997.

The mean childhood blood level of these study participants was 13 mcg/dl, and ranged from 4 to 37 mcg/dl. Many researchers say even 5 mcg/dl can put a child at risk.

**************************************

Damn, I knew I shouldn't have been chewing on those paint chips.

pcosmar
05-28-2008, 11:59 AM
More junk science.

They recruited 250 pregnant women from a poor lead-contaminated inner-city district in Cincinnati.
I would think it may have more to do with the environment, poor. inner city district, than lead.
Though lead is without doubt, harmful, it does not explain the criminals that were raised in affluent healthy environments.
As far as the statistics go the poor have less chance of getting a good lawyer, so there would be a higher conviction rate compared to the well to do, and politically connected.

A flawed study, with preconceived results.

WRellim
05-28-2008, 12:51 PM
This TOTALLY explains George W. Bush... mommy fed him paint chips.

Now what about Cheney?

Agent CSL
05-28-2008, 12:59 PM
More junk science.

I would think it may have more to do with the environment, poor. inner city district, than lead.
Though lead is without doubt, harmful, it does not explain the criminals that were raised in affluent healthy environments.
As far as the statistics go the poor have less chance of getting a good lawyer, so there would be a higher conviction rate compared to the well to do, and politically connected.

A flawed study, with preconceived results.
I agree. Very flawed study.

Rural areas are more likely to have lead and yet crime in rural areas is very, very low. Rural areas depend on old pipes, old houses. But I find that rural areas, though spread out, have a higher sense of community and morality. That's what I find anyway. I live in a rural neighborhood. :) We only have a slight meth problem. Our neighbor's house has been broken into but there hasn't been a violent crime here for a loooooooong time. The last time someone got shot it was an accident. (Backwoods Washington state - go figure).

I don't deny the effects of lead. It's still a plague on humanity and the environment. Sometimes I wonder if our pipes are lead.

FindLiberty
05-28-2008, 01:03 PM
Let's see,

Kids grow up packed into anti-urban-sprawl cities with draconian anti-gun laws. The lead still flies about from cheap illegal guns due to the governement's war on some drugs (driveby shootings are a gang turf battle - lead enhances this lifestyle for families and kids to grow up into selling drugs or fighting for turf). The kids can go about eating paint chips and junk food while attending guberment skoolz that can't teach them to read. The school fudges the grading system to keep the "no child left behind" money rolling in. Taxes keep everyone else away from the city so that traditional "employment" prospects are unlikely... shall I run on?

Yea, it's all about "lead" and crime.

Dr.3D
05-28-2008, 01:04 PM
Darn, I knew I shouldn't have been siphoning leaded gasoline out of cars when I was a kid. :rolleyes:

RideTheDirt
05-28-2008, 02:40 PM
This TOTALLY explains George W. Bush... mommy fed him paint chips.

Now what about Cheney?
Satan's spawn?

WRellim
05-28-2008, 02:50 PM
Satan's spawn?

Works for me.

I was thinking more in the line of mechanically replaced body parts having a negative influence (maybe if we could just get LaForge to reverse the polarity? Seems to fix everything else!) :D

yongrel
05-28-2008, 02:53 PM
More junk science.

I would think it may have more to do with the environment, poor. inner city district, than lead.
Though lead is without doubt, harmful, it does not explain the criminals that were raised in affluent healthy environments.
As far as the statistics go the poor have less chance of getting a good lawyer, so there would be a higher conviction rate compared to the well to do, and politically connected.

A flawed study, with preconceived results.

Good point.

Still interesting though.

Quantum
05-28-2008, 02:54 PM
Not a controlled experiment.