PDA

View Full Version : Ron Paul: " We are going to have a rally in D.C July 12th"




qwerty
05-20-2008, 04:26 AM
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4432225369745587956

at 38.42

www.revolutionmarch.com



:cool:

Uncle Emanuel Watkins
05-20-2008, 08:54 AM
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=4432225369745587956

at 38.42

www.revolutionmarch.com



:cool:

Why has Dr. Ron Paul chosen not to narrow down the message of the Constitution to its self evident and inalienable truths? According to the science used by the founding fathers to create such an undeniable conclusion, such truths are supposed to reduce beyond partisan politics to the very soul of every human being. Yet, there has been little effort to organize both the conservatives and the liberals who frequent this forum into a common American movement.
First off, the self evident and inalienable truths justifying the Constitution are supposed to be timeless beyond all past traditions or any future occurences. Yet, the Constitution is even considered primitive by naive members who frequent this forum when no argument by historians can be made to challenge a self evident and inalienable truth.
Secondly, the self evident and inalienable truths are supposed to establish a formal culture beyond all others. Rather than establish a border to protect an Aristocracy of a king, the border of our nation is supposed to be established to protect our formal culture from that of lessor ones. Yet, little effort is made to differentiate the development of that formal culture in the United States from the pagan culture of the primitive anglo tribes that once existed in Western Europe. Establishing similarities between that primitive culture in Western Europe and that of the Native African and Native American tribes elsewhere is very important. The history of the development of "positive" constitutional governments don't reach back into the culture of the rebellious barbarians after all but reach back 2500 years to ancient Greek civilization. So, the development of the U.S. Constitution goes beyond race, creed and color.
Thirdly, a Constitutional government is supposed to be a positive government -- a government which deals not with just the happiness of its master class but with the happiness of all of its people as a whole. Yet, the ideal of liberty in the United States today seems to be about personal liberty rather than about the regulation of it. While it is clear that our government has had to grant liberty to the slaves, we don't like to recognize that our government had to bind a robber baron aristocracy. Although we don't have a socialism which attempts to sit every American citizen as classless at the same dinner table, we do have a social contract which binds the master class to sit at the same table as the slave class. Thirsting while sitting at a different table from tyranny is what caused our founding fathers to create our government in the first place.
Forthly, a military aristocracy made up of nobles was set up by the king to seperate himself and his master class from the untouchables and their slave class. Yet, we seem to honor a military aristocracy established by entitlements and commissions today rather than honor a serving militia of the people. A militia of the people is necessary for the functioning of our Constitutional government and its ideal of a bound master and a freed slave sitting together at a single table without tyranny.