PDA

View Full Version : Ron's new kick-ass video




anonymous6728
05-15-2008, 07:38 PM
I think RP's finally drawn blood. The ADL will be coming at him for sure and try to smear him with his old newsletters. To back up his words with action, I think he's gotta go 3rd party now, either with Jesse Ventura or that Libertarian guy.

I think the tide is turning. Ben Olbermann of msnbc really ripped into GWB in a way I haven't heard in years. Someone might actually get up the gumption to impeach or arrest that traitor. Check out these vids:
http://www.infowars.com/?p=2170
http://www.breitbart.tv/?p=96473

MRoCkEd
05-15-2008, 07:51 PM
it's not a new speech
sure the video was updated with pictures (note: the person who posted it is anti-semitic, unfortunately)
but the speech was ~3 years ago

Change
05-15-2008, 08:45 PM
This is not from the Ron Paul Campaign. It looks like a cut and paste video of audio and then pictures.

anonymous6728
05-15-2008, 10:34 PM
Thanks for the heads-up. My first impression was that it was really "in your face" in terms of confronting the Neocons irrational bond with Israel. That along with the msnbc commentary really was a brutal 1-2 punch to the Neocons. Someone at Infowars has really been a naughty boy. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LukAmJQeyAo

If Ron's words weren't anti-semitic, the pictures certainly were. But then again, according to the ADL, the New Testament is considered hate literature. I'm sure similar arguments could be made about the Torah and the Talmud, a path I would not want to go. Woe to the people that get the Bible banned!

http://www.messiahtruth.com/anti.html
http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/102406.htm
http://www.adl.org/99hatecrime/intro.asp

Luft97
05-15-2008, 11:00 PM
it's not a new speech
sure the video was updated with pictures (note: the person who posted it is anti-semitic, unfortunately)
but the speech was ~3 years ago

Why say that? Because he points out the relation to Israel of the men named? It just so happens that most of the people Ron named are Jewish. Coincidence I'm sure.