PDA

View Full Version : Women as a Weapon Against the Neocons




pinkmandy
05-01-2008, 08:53 PM
To shame the neocon men. What kind of "man" sends our kids off to war for no GOOD reason? What kind of "man" won't stand up for the priniciples of a free country for his own family? Maybe all the RP ladies need to talk at the conventions, maybe we need to stand up and speak to the men like they NEED to be spoken to. These "men" should be ashamed to show themselves in public. :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad:

Yes, I'm pissed. I'm sick of MEN who won't do WHAT IS RIGHT. I don't see how they can even look in the mirror. :mad::mad::mad:

I'm going to go grab a glass of wine now. So much anger...

And I'm proud to know all you guys and gals, btw. I use the term "man" loosely to describe those who are ruining our country.

Edited to change title. ;)

brandon
05-01-2008, 08:54 PM
I like the content of your post, but you might want to change the title ;)

The One
05-01-2008, 08:55 PM
To shame the neocon men. What kind of "man" sends our kids off to war for no GOOD reason? What kind of "man" won't stand up for the priniciples of a free country for his own family? Maybe all the RP ladies need to talk at the conventions, maybe we need to stand up and speak to the men like they NEED to be spoken to. These "men" should be ashamed to show themselves in public. :mad: :mad: :mad: :mad:

Yes, I'm pissed. I'm sick of MEN who won't do WHAT IS RIGHT. I don't see how they can even look in the mirror. :mad::mad::mad:

I'm going to go grab a glass of wine now. So much anger...

And I'm proud to know all you guys and gals, btw. I use the term "man" loosely to describe those who are ruining our country.

I think that would just turn male voters off.....you sound too much like our nagging wives.:D

Paulitical Correctness
05-01-2008, 08:55 PM
I was under the impression that this was going to be about using Ron Paul girls to create sex scandals.

Kludge
05-01-2008, 08:55 PM
I like the content of your post, but you might want to change the title ;)

Lol... I wasn't sure where this thread was going to go with an angry face along with the title.

pinkmandy
05-01-2008, 08:57 PM
I think that would just turn male voters off.....you sound too much like our nagging wives.:D


True. But apparently neocon men don't mind doing what they're told? They should just be ashamed. I really think that many Repub men would be if they realized what they were doing.

Agent CSL
05-01-2008, 08:59 PM
I was under the impression that this was going to be about using Ron Paul girls to create sex scandals.

Already on that

pinkmandy
05-01-2008, 08:59 PM
Already on that


Hillary??? She can wait. McNut first. ;)

Kludge
05-01-2008, 09:00 PM
Already on that

Hope we make front page on FoxNewsPorn.com someday...

SeanEdwards
05-01-2008, 09:30 PM
I thought women ran this country.

acptulsa
05-02-2008, 06:47 AM
I was under the impression that this was going to be about using Ron Paul girls to create sex scandals.

Neocons get enough for just being jackasses in power. Let's not try to talk real women into doing things that would turn their stomachs. I'm anti-war and very anti-civil war but would rather fight than ask for that.

amy31416
05-02-2008, 07:02 AM
Neocons get enough for just being jackasses in power. Let's not try to talk real women into doing things that would turn their stomachs. I'm anti-war and very anti-civil war but would rather fight than ask for that.

Thank you. Not that anyone, anywhere, anytime could talk me into something like that, but thank you.

Paulitical Correctness
05-02-2008, 08:39 AM
Neocons get enough for just being jackasses in power. Let's not try to talk real women into doing things that would turn their stomachs. I'm anti-war and very anti-civil war but would rather fight than ask for that.

Oh come on, I was only kidding.

I would never want a Ron Paul gal to lower herself like that (not that any would - they support Ron Paul, they've got to have respectable morals and be pretty damn intelligent).

Sorry to offend.

SeanEdwards
05-02-2008, 08:50 AM
Let's not try to talk real women into doing things that would turn their stomachs. I'm anti-war and very anti-civil war but would rather fight than ask for that.

Killing people is less offensive than using sex as a weapon?

That's some whacked out morals right there.

acptulsa
05-02-2008, 08:56 AM
Killing people is less offensive than using sex as a weapon?

That's some whacked out morals right there.

Well, you may be right. But I'm looking at the difference between the quality of the people being asked to commit themselves to intimite battle and the "quality" of these neocons, and I'm drawing that line. If that's contemptible, I'm sorry.

TruthAtLast
05-02-2008, 09:35 AM
I think that would just turn male voters off.....you sound too much like our nagging wives.:D

or it could turn the male voters ON. :D

FreeTraveler
05-02-2008, 09:35 AM
Two possible actions:

1) Lysistrata Corps (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lysistrata) - convince women to cut the sex supply off as long as one of their sons is at risk.
2) Freedom-loving gals who are into sport sex may consider it no sacrifice to entrap high-powered officials into scandals that get them out of office. I've known a few who would consider it a fun project and a patriotic gift to their fellow freedom fighters. I no longer travel in those circles, however. :D

SeanEdwards
05-02-2008, 03:10 PM
Well, you may be right. But I'm looking at the difference between the quality of the people being asked to commit themselves to intimite battle and the "quality" of these neocons, and I'm drawing that line. If that's contemptible, I'm sorry.

Given who we're talking about, we should probably be exploring the idea of using young, attractive, male Paulians to use sex as a weapon. Much of the GOP takes a wide stance, if you know what I mean.

;)