Yeah, this about sums it up.

[inibo]

I ran across this on a digg thread and all I could say was "Ah, yup."


Socialists and Neocons VS Ron Paul

While thousands of children die in Iraq and Afghanistan, socialists and neocons talk about Ron Paul not choosing to fund stem cell research at the federal level.

While the President gets all the power he wants to spy on and kidnap any innocent Americans indefinitely, socialists and neocons talk about how Ron Paul’s supporters spam the intarwebs.

While the American economy implodes a little further with the boom / bust cycle created by the Federal Reserve, socialists and neocons talk about how Ron Paul can’t win.

While the American Constitution and the people’s rights are utterly destroyed, socialists and neocons talk about how Ron Paul message of individual liberty is “anachronistic”.

While people suffer without health care because of government intervention in the market, socialists and neocons talk about Ron Paul’s ghost writer of more than a decade ago.

While the Bush administration along with the Democrats in Congress plot to drop nuclear weapons on Iran, socialists and neocons spin every great Ron Paul victory to be failure.

While Ron Paul educates America on economics and freedom, neocons and socialists spread Marxist and Keynesian myths that undermine freedom.

While Ron Paul continues to win the fight against lies and liars, neocons and socialists redouble their efforts to no effect whatsoever.

Posted by bryanedds (http://digg.com/users/bryanedds/profile) on this thread (http://digg.com/2008_us_elections/NEWS_FLASH_Ron_Paul_Wins_Alabama_Test_Poll_By_Wide _Margin?t=8612597#c8621404).


bryanedds, whoever you are, good on you!

[amonasro]

That's so true. Post that up on hannity.com and watch their heads explode.

[john_anderson_ii]

I'm not waiting for copyright permission. I'm going to start this circulating on My Space right now!

I'll site the original source of course. (<-- That really makes me what to throw "horse" in there somewhere :rolleyes: )

[NoxTwilight]

I stopped reading digg comments a long time ago - I am sure I don't have to explain why :rolleyes:

Thanks for posting this as I certainly would have missed it otherwise.

Here is his blog: http://towardliberty.blogspot.com/

He's definitely one of us :)

[inibo]

I stopped reading digg comments a long time ago - I am sure I don't have to explain why :rolleyes:

Thanks for posting this as I certainly would have missed it otherwise.

Here is his blog: http://towardliberty.blogspot.com/

He's definitely one of us :)

Yeah I saw his blog. It hasn't been update since May, though. Maybe he's been busy in the real world.

[austin356]

It is posted on hannity:

http://hannity.com/forum/showthread.php?t=294281

[torchbearer]

It is posted on hannity:

http://hannity.com/forum/showthread.php?t=294281

sweeeet. i'm not a member there.... are those people convertible?

[Slugg]

sweeeet. i'm not a member there.... are those people convertible?

I'm sure some of them are; but most are pretty set in their ways. When logic and proof begin to gain a foothold; the name calling comes out in spades!

[torchbearer]

I notice they don't argue with facts.... they just say stuff like... 'if you think that then you are in the wrong country' -

[fj45lvr]

Nice work there .....I see he missed a couple from Fox news....

Paul is "traitor" and "isolationist" AND "likely 3rd party candidate" according to "other republicans"

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8863226571818749479&q=ron+paul&total=333&start=10&num=10&so=1&type=search&plindex=1

[Jennifer Reynolds]

///

[noxagol]

Well done. I have noticed that most detractors of Ron Paul don't argue with facts. They are just mad at us for talking at all. It is sad really. They are missing the best thing to hit this country because they don't like that people like it. It is a kind of anti-sheep movement. If all these people like him, he can't be good. Total silliness.

Nah. It is even sillier than that. They think that because he talks against the trend he is wrong.

I tell these people of two historical figures that talked against the trend. One of them goes by the name of Christopher Columbus who said something retarded like the world is round. Then there is Galileo who said that other retarded thing when he said the universe does not revolve around the Earth.

These guys said things people thought were completely insane, but hey they were right in the end.

[Trance Dance Master]

sweeeet. i'm not a member there.... are those people convertible?
Is anybody not convertible? Excluding shills, of course.

[RevolutionSD]

I would add to that, while socialists and neocons debate the merits of Ron Paul's abortion stance of leaving the law up to the states, we are becoming a police state dictatorship.

[amonasro]

I would add to that, while socialists and neocons debate the merits of Ron Paul's abortion stance of leaving the law up to the states, we are becoming a police state dictatorship.

Since most neocons like to be told what to believe, I'm sure they welcome it.

[SWATH]

Wow, there are people there who say that if it came down to Hillary and a Republican, the only Republican that would force them to vote for Hillary is Ron Paul! W T F

http://hannity.com/forum/showthread.php?t=294211

Well I guess Hillary is closer to neoconservatism so why am I surprised?

[Bob Cochran]

Well I guess Hillary is closer to neoconservatism so why am I surprised?
I haven't followed Hillary's maneuverings very closely, but from what I've heard and seen, she appears to be trying to formulate a blend of popular liberalism and conservatism that she and her strategists think will get her the most votes. She stands for and believes in nothing other than the advancement of her own status and power, as is the case with the vast majority of politicians.

[Nash]

Wow, there are people there who say that if it came down to Hillary and a Republican, the only Republican that would force them to vote for Hillary is Ron Paul! W T F

http://hannity.com/forum/showthread.php?t=294211

Well I guess Hillary is closer to neoconservatism so why am I surprised?

It shouldn't be surprising because these people are not conservative. What is sad is that they truly believe that they are.

In a debate between Ron Paul and Hilary Clinton all you have to do is look at the number of bills Hilary voted for that George Bush signed versus the number of bills Ron Paul voted no and George Bush signed.

Guess who is going to sync more often.

In a hypothetical general election where it is Hilary Clinton against Ron Paul all Ron Paul has to do is first talk about how much Bush sucks, then remind the American people how much they think he sucks and then point out that Hilary agrees with Bush's policies more than he does and show the voting records to prove it.

Of course that requires the American people to listen and think, but it could be a winning strategy.

[Nash]

I haven't followed Hillary's maneuverings very closely, but from what I've heard and seen, she appears to be trying to formulate a blend of popular liberalism and conservatism that she and her strategists think will get her the most votes.

This worked exceptionally well in Germany in the 30's.

[paulitics]

sweeeet. i'm not a member there.... are those people convertible?

I lurk Hannity from time to time. From what I see, the democrats and independents on there are open minded. The neocons aren't. The neocons admit to rather voting for Hillary than Ron. Quite telling, isn't it. And the irony, is they call Ron supporters, socialists or liberals. Yep, the mindset of brainwashed parrots displayed quite openly on Hannity forums.

[torchbearer]

I lurk Hannity from time to time. From what I see, the democrats and independents on there are open minded. The neocons aren't. The neocons admit to rather voting for Hillary than Ron. Quite telling, isn't it. And the irony, is they call Ron supporters, socialists or liberals. Yep, the mindset of brainwashed parrots displayed quite openly on Hannity forums.

it looks like the Fred Thompson Forum (http://www.fredthompsonforum.com)

[Roxi]

actually i would imagine the powers that be who want hilary in office would FEAR the hell out of RP winning the nomination, I think if forced to vote for hilary or ron paul voters dem and rep would all vote for RP. and i think they know that

[zahirakids]

Awesome...Just posted this somewhere :o (hoping it is okay) waiting to see the response and waiting for the bomb throwers

[inibo]

I finally tracked the author down. Apparently his comment on digg was just a part of a full essay. He posted it on LRC about a week ago.

http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig8/edds1.html

[dircha]

It is posted on hannity:

http://hannity.com/forum/showthread.php?t=294281

Correction: was!

[dircha]

I lurk Hannity from time to time. From what I see, the democrats and independents on there are open minded. The neocons aren't. The neocons admit to rather voting for Hillary than Ron. Quite telling, isn't it. And the irony, is they call Ron supporters, socialists or liberals. Yep, the mindset of brainwashed parrots displayed quite openly on Hannity forums.

That may be, but these are the same committed, neo-conservative followers we will need to convert if Ron is to have any chance of getting the nomination.

When they won't listen to your answer, the alternative is to redefine the question.

[kenc9]

Wow, there are people there who say that if it came down to Hillary and a Republican, the only Republican that would force them to vote for Hillary is Ron Paul! W T F

http://hannity.com/forum/showthread.php?t=294211

Well I guess Hillary is closer to neoconservatism so why am I surprised?

Thats because she is a strong One Worlder, supports the CFR, NAU and all the rest. Fox News owner has donated to her run for president as well.

-ken