a MUST see -- we are not alone!

[suzypotaka]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EwZt6bvyMqI&feature=related

under legislation called the Proxmire Act, booshie & cheneykins, can be held criminally liable (not just impeachable) for war crimes!
as RP has said 1000's of times --the current war is unconstitutional --& our actions have been MUCH more seriously taken by other countries than our own US citizens!

sheeple wake up!!!

**watch all 4 b/4 they disappear--interesting how comments & ratings were DISABLED so soon??!!!???

[Vet_from_cali]

nice!!!! do we have something similar in the US?

thanks for the post.

[Ex Post Facto]

You can only impeach a sitting President; However, once impeached charges can be brought against the official. Impeachment just basically removes them from office.

Conyers has now said "Impeachment will happen." (http://www.cnsnews.com/news/viewstory.asp?Page=/Politics/archive/200803/POL20080319c.html) Timing is everything to him, as he doesn't want to paint thier party in a bad light and end up with McCain in the White House. He said there is only one reason that he would speed up the process...if Bush decides to invade Iran.

[Hook]

You can only impeach a sitting President; However, once impeached charges can be brought against the official. Impeachment just basically removes them from office.

Conyers has now said "Impeachment will happen." (http://www.cnsnews.com/news/viewstory.asp?Page=/Politics/archive/200803/POL20080319c.html) Timing is everything to him, as he doesn't want to paint thier party in a bad light and end up with McCain in the White House. He said there is only one reason that he would speed up the process...if Bush decides to invade Iran.

Yeah and the Dems said we would be out of Iraq if we elected them in 2006. Still waiting for that one.

They are just playing politics as usual. Meanwhile people are dying.

[GoPaul08]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EwZt6bvyMqI&feature=related

under legislation called the Proxmire Act, booshie & cheneykins, can be held criminally liable (not just impeachable) for war crimes!
as RP has said 1000's of times --the current war is unconstitutional --& our actions have been MUCH more seriously taken by other countries than our own US citizens!

sheeple wake up!!!

**watch all 4 b/4 they disappear--interesting how comments & ratings were DISABLED so soon??!!!???


It isn't unconsitutional, nor is it illegal. You may not like the fact that we are there, but it makes YOU (and sorry, but Ron Paul) to call it unconstitutional.

[Hook]

It isn't unconsitutional, nor is it illegal. You may not like the fact that we are there, but it makes YOU (and sorry, but Ron Paul) to call it unconstitutional.

It is unconstitutional in the sense that Congress never declared war.
The big impeachment issue is whether Bush knowingly lied about intelligence to get us into war. That is an impeachable offence.

[molly_pitcher]

MY best friend says they are wanting to send her to Afghanistan. She's a Marine. ;-;

[runderwo]

It isn't unconsitutional, nor is it illegal. You may not like the fact that we are there, but it makes YOU (and sorry, but Ron Paul) to call it unconstitutional.

Not only does the last sentence in your post make no sense, but your whole premise is wrong. Read Article I, Section 8 for a refresher.

[Shink]

MY best friend says they are wanting to send her to Afghanistan. She's a Marine. ;-;

Once Iran happens, females can expect to be sent over, and likely drafted. Hell, my wife, who is in the Iowa National Guard BAND (as in plays instruments once a month) has noticed things that tell me, as a veteran, that even her unit is likely to deploy. I hate this shit.

[dannno]

Why does GoPaul08 continue to spread anti-Ron Paul misinformation on almost every single thread??

[ItsTime]

//


It is unconstitutional in the sense that Congress never declared war.
The big impeachment issue is whether Bush knowingly lied about intelligence to get us into war. That is an impeachable offence.

[robertwerden]

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/usc_sec_18_00001091----000-.html


(a) Basic Offense.— Whoever, whether in time of peace or in time of war, in a circumstance described in subsection (d) and with the specific intent to destroy, in whole or in substantial part, a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group as such—
(1) kills members of that group;
(2) causes serious bodily injury to members of that group;
(3) causes the permanent impairment of the mental faculties of members of the group through drugs, torture, or similar techniques;
(4) subjects the group to conditions of life that are intended to cause the physical destruction of the group in whole or in part;
(5) imposes measures intended to prevent births within the group; or
(6) transfers by force children of the group to another group;
or attempts to do so, shall be punished as provided in subsection (b).
(b) Punishment for Basic Offense.— The punishment for an offense under subsection (a) is—
(1) in the case of an offense under subsection (a)(1), where death results, by death or imprisonment for life and a fine of not more than $1,000,000, or both; and
(2) a fine of not more than $1,000,000 or imprisonment for not more than twenty years, or both, in any other case.
(c) Incitement Offense.— Whoever in a circumstance described in subsection (d) directly and publicly incites another to violate subsection (a) shall be fined not more than $500,000 or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.
(d) Required Circumstance for Offenses.— The circumstance referred to in subsections (a) and (c) is that—
(1) the offense is committed within the United States; or
(2) the alleged offender is a national of the United States (as defined in section 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1101)).
(e) Nonapplicability of Certain Limitations.— Notwithstanding section 3282 of this title, in the case of an offense under subsection (a)(1), an indictment may be found, or information instituted, at any time without limitation.