PDA

View Full Version : According to the Constitution Hillary cant be president




seapilot
03-06-2008, 10:09 PM
Unless she gets a sex change. It is gender specific and has never been amended. No one pays attention to the constitution anymore so it probably wont be a big deal.
http://www.newswithviews.com/Ryter/jon217.htm
http://www.newswithviews.com/Ryter/jon218.htm

Devil_rules_in_extremes
03-06-2008, 10:11 PM
I already thought Hillary was a man....

thuja
03-06-2008, 10:14 PM
thought you meant the irish passport.

Andrew-Austin
03-06-2008, 10:17 PM
lol well your about to give strict constitutionalists a bad name. Come on now.

forsmant
03-06-2008, 10:18 PM
In English it is grammatically correct to use to masculine form when writing about an unspecific person.

Andrew-Austin
03-06-2008, 10:19 PM
In English it is grammatically correct to use to masculine form when writing about an unspecific person.

Indeed it is.

/thread

seapilot
03-06-2008, 10:29 PM
In English it is grammatically correct to use to masculine form when writing about an unspecific person.

That is very true, but the author brings up the point about congressman requirements:

The Senate of the United States shall be composed of two Senators from each State chosen by the legislature thereof No person shall be a Senator who shall have attained the age of 30 years, and been 9 years a citizen of the United States, and who shall not, when elected, be an inhabitant of that State for which he shall be chosen." Only one time, in one sentence, in Article I are the members of the House and/or Senate collectively referred to in male gender, and that is in Section 6, paragraph 2. In that instance, the usage is basically generic since there is no individual gender specific reference made for an individual person.

danberkeley
03-06-2008, 10:35 PM
At this point, it doesn't matter what the Constitution say because if this issue was taken to the Supreme Court, the Court would rule in favor of Clinton because "times have changed".

Dave Pedersen
03-06-2008, 10:37 PM
When women gained the right to vote it would suggest they also gained the privilege to serve. Has it been stipulated that Senators must be male?

seapilot
03-06-2008, 11:09 PM
When women gained the right to vote it would suggest they also gained the privilege to serve. Has it been stipulated that Senators must be male?

According to the author it doesnt stipulate that congressman should be male. Just it has real strong undertones that the president must be. Also agree times have changed but there should have been an amendment to clarify it. According to the author the 19th amendment allows either sex the right to vote , it does not suggest serving in office.