ToryNotion
03-05-2008, 07:55 AM
I don't watch the MSM that much and their 'all CliBama, all the time' coverage but I'm picking up that
1) Clinton is weak in caucuses
2) Obama gets more fundraising and volunteer support from the grass roots
and younger voters
Bill tried to spin Hill's weakness in caucuses as a demographic thing: caucus voters are better off and don't need government as much but I think it goes deeper than that. I think Obama has done a better good of seeking and energizing grassroots supporters.
I wonder if his grassroots organizers and their counterparts in the paid staff have a fight for every delegate strategy similar to RP's? The point is moot I suppose if he is persuaded to step aside to ensure party cohesion and success in the general election.
1) Clinton is weak in caucuses
2) Obama gets more fundraising and volunteer support from the grass roots
and younger voters
Bill tried to spin Hill's weakness in caucuses as a demographic thing: caucus voters are better off and don't need government as much but I think it goes deeper than that. I think Obama has done a better good of seeking and energizing grassroots supporters.
I wonder if his grassroots organizers and their counterparts in the paid staff have a fight for every delegate strategy similar to RP's? The point is moot I suppose if he is persuaded to step aside to ensure party cohesion and success in the general election.