PDA

View Full Version : Smearing Campaign in full force on Ralph Nader




Ex Post Facto
02-27-2008, 12:29 PM
I'm so disgusted looking through news alerts. The media has already began calling Nader supporters names. This is the same pattern we experienced. I think Ron Paul was wrong on one thing only this campaign: He felt being part of the GOP would get him a fair shake, and I think it wouldn't have mattered either way. The smearing but pimply faced adolescent journalists would have happened anyway.

pcosmar
02-27-2008, 12:47 PM
So.
What is your point.
Nader has never supported the Constitution in anything I have ever seen.
What are his positions?
Other than his hatred of Corporations, does he have any plan.
His web site has NO positions, No solutions, and No plan.
Why should I care about Nader?????:confused:

mdh
02-27-2008, 12:48 PM
Yeah, but Nader deserves it. He's an evil socialist type. :)

Ex Post Facto
02-27-2008, 01:19 PM
You miss the point. I don't mind them attacking his policies. They are attacking his supporters. Don't you get it? They control the people by saying if you agree with him then you are an idiot. This is the single most damaging method MSM uses is all I'm saying. It's something to watch and pay attention to.

familydog
02-27-2008, 01:21 PM
You miss the point. I don't mind them attacking his policies. They are attacking his supporters. Don't you get it? They control the people by saying if you agree with him then you are an idiot. This is the single most damaging method MSM uses is all I'm saying. It's something to watch and pay attention to.

I agree. Attack his positions, fine. Attack his supporters, I don't go for that.

PatriotOne
02-27-2008, 01:27 PM
You miss the point. I don't mind them attacking his policies. They are attacking his supporters. Don't you get it? They control the people by saying if you agree with him then you are an idiot. This is the single most damaging method MSM uses is all I'm saying. It's something to watch and pay attention to.

I get it Ex. What are they calling them?

PatriotOne
02-27-2008, 01:31 PM
I agree. Attack his positions, fine. Attack his supporters, I don't go for that.

To attack a person's righteous position is to expose themselves as tools for the criminals. Wouldn't want to make the viewer's think about the issue itself....they might come to the right conclusion. Much more effective to smear the person when you work for the devil.

Ex Post Facto
02-27-2008, 01:32 PM
Here is a line from one article. Apparently if you are a Nader supporter you belong to a cult.


Nader's "egotism and cult of left-wing purity has been an utter disaster for the values he affects to espouse,"

Pauliana
02-27-2008, 01:33 PM
Watch and listen how they blame him for Gore losing. It's not Gore's fault - it's Naders, right?

Can you understand why, then, a third party run by Dr. Paul would be shooting himself in the foot? The GOP is dying for a scapegoat for their sure loss this year. Marginalizing Dr. Paul even further would be a bonus.

nbhadja
02-27-2008, 01:34 PM
Hey that's less RP smearing then.

Ex Post Facto
02-27-2008, 01:37 PM
Hey that's less RP smearing then.

Yes, less than RP. I see the basis starting for less focus on his issues and more pointing to he is a left-wing nut, move along nothing to see here, just an ass-hat, kook idealist.