PDA

View Full Version : Wow! Another RP Republican Raking in the Cash!




1836
02-26-2008, 04:00 AM
Look at Murray Sabrin's counter! (http://www.murraysabrin.com/home.aspx)

$191,673.44 as of this posting!


BJ Lawson's fundraising has slowed down but he's still well over 70 grand! (http://www.lawsonforcongress.com/)

RPF's own Brent Sanders is now comfortably above 6 thousand, and the Louisiana primary is not until September! (http://www.joinsanders.com/)

New Hampshire HQ's Jim Forsythe now has a counter on his site and has raised around $30,000 in a short period of time! (http://www.jimforsythe.com/)

There are many other liberty candidates that need our help!

Do your own research and see which ones have the best chance. Then, donate! (http://www.paulcongress.com)

amy31416
02-26-2008, 04:41 AM
Look at Murray Sabrin's counter! (http://www.murraysabrin.com/home.aspx)

$191,673.44 as of this posting!


BJ Lawson's fundraising has slowed down but he's still well over 70 grand! (http://www.lawsonforcongress.com/)

RPF's own Brent Sanders is now comfortably above 6 thousand, and the Louisiana primary is not until September! (http://www.joinsanders.com/)

New Hampshire HQ's Jim Forsythe now has a counter on his site and has raised around $30,000 in a short period of time! (http://www.jimforsythe.com/)

There are many other liberty candidates that need our help!

Do your own research and see which ones have the best chance. Then, donate! (http://www.paulcongress.com)

Murray is great....look at this YouTube for his answer on the second amendment--great guy, officially endorsed by Ron Paul.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RHxq_23OLoM

Time for Change
02-26-2008, 09:46 AM
Yes...Dean Santoro really needs a cash infusion.

See this thread...
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=122749

or his site at

http://www.santoroforcongress.org/

freedom-maniac
02-26-2008, 09:51 AM
Maybe we could make YouTube videos for them like we did for RP and Dec. 16. It ought to draw a lot of attention.

Rhys
02-26-2008, 09:57 AM
unfortunately, 200k isn't raking in the cash.

John Dingell here in Michigan ended Q4 with $1.2 million cash on hand for a House seat. Plus, TV and radio in Michigan is cheaper than NJ.

The fact is, every candidate, house or senate, must raise half a million to even compete. For me, competing is more like $1-3 million. heh

keep your cheque books handy. lol

FSP-Rebel
02-26-2008, 10:56 AM
Even having 2-3 fairly well-funded RP candidates isn't gonna do diddily squat for us, and that's presuming they win. I hate to be the reality check at the door but... It would be one thing if this forum still had the traffic it once had, but the majority are back to their lives trying to re-cop the money they've spent and at least survive the coming depression if it's not partially here already. I wanted more than anyone to see RP win, but this campaign should be a testimony to the strength and tenacity of the elite and their media. It is just impossible winning on a national scale with the MSM guarding the hen house. That is why, sorry to sound like a broken record, the only thing left to do is vote with your feet and move to the future Free State-NH. If not, have fun in the remaining years of your life as things come crashing down around you and there's no more activists left to help cause they left for Galt's Gulch--freestateproject.org I know some have a hardon for NH because of the way things turned out, but that was majorly due to the manipulation of the public by the media and maybe some incompetence from National HQ. The one thing that can never be said is that NH activists didn't do their part. They may not have been successful with a major undertaking like the pre race, but they have kept off an encroaching income/sales tax. With a few more movers, which will no doubt happen this spring/summer, these kind of House bills will be gone forever. The tide will turn from defensive mode to offense--thus true freedom isn't that far off. Live Free or Die--that's the motto I shall live under.

mconder
02-26-2008, 11:04 AM
First, Sabrin says he is for "less government" and advocates a "free market" system where the strongest succeed. He is an unabashed advocate of the private sector. How then does Sabrin justify the fact that he received $322,000 of TAXPAYER MONEY to run for governor? He raised a little over $200,000 in "private money" and took over one and a half times that in the form of a government "subsidy." (Aren't you against welfare, Murray?) If he believes so much in the "free marketplace" then why didn't he raise ALL of his money privately?

Sabrinites say Murray is only taking advantage of the system. Many have compared Sabrin's accepting of taxpayer funds to Bill Clinton's White House fundraising tactics. It is all LEGAL. Sure, but Murray Sabrin isn't supposed to be like other politicians. He is supposed to be different - the OUTSIDER who doesn't accept the status quo. Hey Murray, at least have the honesty to admit that while you say you are against public welfare, the rules are different when you are the beneficiary of it.

Wow...that's pretty damning. No wonder RP had the wisdom not to take the money.

georgeajjan
02-26-2008, 12:20 PM
Murray Sabrin needs to raise money now to solidify himself as a frontrunner in this race, and I'm talking about the Republican Primary on June 3, which is expected to have low turnout (that's good for us).

Here is the breakdown of how this race has unfolded:

Wealthy woman puts in $1.5 million of her own money to try to buy the nomination
Establishment started getting cold feet because of her non-existent political track record and poor grasp of issues
State Senator with small fundraising base enters the race, doesn't light any fires
Murray Sabrin enters the race, starts raising money aggressively, GOP Establishment perks up
A video released yesterday contrasting Murray and his main opponent is released, contrasting their answers on key issues, sends shockwaves through the GOP Establishment - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RHxq_23OLoM
With less than 10% of the County organizations committed to one of the 3 candidates, NOW is the time to show fundraising that can compete with the woman (Anne Estabrook)'s money and put Murray on track to win the nomination on June 3


With $1 million, Murray wins the nomination for US Senate. Then he becomes a national figure, as there are only 34 US Senate races this fall, and Democrat Frank Lautenberg is one of the weakest incumbents in the whole country.

This is our chance to have a "Champion of the Constitution" in the US Senate, to co-sponsor legislation with Ron Paul and Legalize Freedom!!!

The stars are aligned - weak GOP opponents, a weak Democrat incumbent, and a mobilized and energized Freedom Movement.

Please pledge today at http://www.murraysabrin.com.

---
George Ajjan
Communications Director, Sabrin for Senate

Highstreet
02-26-2008, 12:21 PM
Look at Murray Sabrin's counter! (http://www.murraysabrin.com/home.aspx)

$191,673.44 as of this posting!


BJ Lawson's fundraising has slowed down but he's still well over 70 grand! (http://www.lawsonforcongress.com/)

RPF's own Brent Sanders is now comfortably above 6 thousand, and the Louisiana primary is not until September! (http://www.joinsanders.com/)

New Hampshire HQ's Jim Forsythe now has a counter on his site and has raised around $30,000 in a short period of time! (http://www.jimforsythe.com/)

There are many other liberty candidates that need our help!

Do your own research and see which ones have the best chance. Then, donate! (http://www.paulcongress.com)

great to hear.

jkm1864
02-26-2008, 02:16 PM
People are tired of the same old crap especially the middle class... So I would have to say a NEOCON or DEMACRAP would need lots of money while someone just telling the truth and exposing the corruption as it pertains to the middle class could get elected. We all know progressive taxes are un-constitutional and it hurts the middle class the most. The majority of people out there do not know that and to be honest You can get the incumbents on just being unconstitutional.

Primbs
02-26-2008, 02:25 PM
At least we are making progress.