dust of nations
02-25-2008, 06:37 PM
as i browse through these forums, i see two things:
one, a huge outcry for revolution, change and for true genuine freedom.
and two, i've noticed, a sense of lack of leadership.
to use the cliche, it's obvious,
there are just to many chiefs and not quite enough indians.
i've browsed through these posts and threads for a few days now,
before i posted one myself. but within the few days its become clear to me that, there's a lack of central leadership to this revolution.
there don't seem to be common goals. while, it is obvious every one seems to want revolution, leading to more freedom. we all don't define revolution and freedom, for that matter, the same way.
it's almost blatantly obvious that, while not admitting defeat,
there is a sense coming from the paul campaign, that they've moved on.
to make sure, paul, retains his seat as a congressman.
and i believe this is the right move. because, i think paul and his campaign understand this revolution is bigger than paul himself. he is merely a player within, and was the spark that ignited the fire, that is soon to become a wildfire. a catalyzing force that has brought us together.
and with the campaign acting as it has, i understand that we all are looking for some sort of leadership. we all have these amazing, ingenious ideas that can turn out to be crucial to our revolution but we, i believe, whether or not it's right, post our brilliant revolutionary plans and then sit back with a sense of apathy towards actually making this goal a realization. and that's were the problem lies.
there is this feeling that now it isn't our responsibility. it's someone else's, we can't be bothered our we don't have the time, or the money or the power to make it happen. we need other people to give a hundred percent of their effort toward the revolution but aren't willing to give a hundred percent ourselves.
100% of our time,
100% of our minds.
one, a huge outcry for revolution, change and for true genuine freedom.
and two, i've noticed, a sense of lack of leadership.
to use the cliche, it's obvious,
there are just to many chiefs and not quite enough indians.
i've browsed through these posts and threads for a few days now,
before i posted one myself. but within the few days its become clear to me that, there's a lack of central leadership to this revolution.
there don't seem to be common goals. while, it is obvious every one seems to want revolution, leading to more freedom. we all don't define revolution and freedom, for that matter, the same way.
it's almost blatantly obvious that, while not admitting defeat,
there is a sense coming from the paul campaign, that they've moved on.
to make sure, paul, retains his seat as a congressman.
and i believe this is the right move. because, i think paul and his campaign understand this revolution is bigger than paul himself. he is merely a player within, and was the spark that ignited the fire, that is soon to become a wildfire. a catalyzing force that has brought us together.
and with the campaign acting as it has, i understand that we all are looking for some sort of leadership. we all have these amazing, ingenious ideas that can turn out to be crucial to our revolution but we, i believe, whether or not it's right, post our brilliant revolutionary plans and then sit back with a sense of apathy towards actually making this goal a realization. and that's were the problem lies.
there is this feeling that now it isn't our responsibility. it's someone else's, we can't be bothered our we don't have the time, or the money or the power to make it happen. we need other people to give a hundred percent of their effort toward the revolution but aren't willing to give a hundred percent ourselves.
100% of our time,
100% of our minds.