PDA

View Full Version : Beware the chaotic premises used in legal tyrannies




Uncle Emanuel Watkins
02-25-2008, 12:04 PM
President Bush just got through discussing in half of an interview he gave on CNN how much he appreciates the performing of charitable acts by Americans. Although his words did sound quite noble, the concept of "charity" always becomes the inferred proposition of the syllogism in a legal tyrrany; as do terms like: health, education, wealth and so on. In other words, rather than it concentrate on the conclusion that our forefathers designed into the U.S. Constitution dealing with the collective contentment of U.S. citizens, the legal tyranny we live today concentrates on legal premises (issues) instead.
An example of using a premise in place of the conclusion of contentment would be a mother rushing her ill child to the doctor. In our legal tyranny, the conclusion is reached that this mother is taking her child to the doctor for his or her "health." According to the civil purpose designed into our Constitution by our forefathers, this mother would be taking her child to the doctor not for his or her health but because he or she is "unhappy."
The issue of education is another example of how a premise becomes the inferred proposition of a syllogism in a legal tyranny. Once again, according to the civil purpose concerning our collective contentment as Americans, we educate our children not for the reason that they be better educated or smarter but for the reason that they might be happier.
Like the legal premises of health and education, the issue of wealth also becomes the inferred proposition in a legal tyranny. Rather than measure it in terms of contentment, wealth is measured in terms of statistics.
The point being made here is that we have a common culture or character as American citizens. While it is clearly expressed when we interpret the U.S. Constitution in terms of its civil purpose, our culture loses its soul when we interpret our laws in chaotic legal terms.
As I have often told my sons, it is okay to die. We go to doctors not to live but to be comforted. If health were our prerequisite goal as Americans rather than our goal be collective contentment, we wouldn't send healthy soldiers into battle but ill or injured ones. Likewise, it is absurd to think that we should educate our children simply for the reason that it is assumed that they are uneducated. We shouldn't be educating them to change their culture (Khmur Rouge); rather, we should be educating them to improve their happiness and contentment.
In regards to wealth, we have become so desensitized by the legal tyranny we live today that most of us can't even read a smile. A smile is something that is pointed upward. Our children recognize this and learn not to fear such a facial expression. In comparison, our government as a legal tyranny has taken on a very evil face. This is the real poverty we should fear.