PDA

View Full Version : On Friday, February 22 the Supreme Court of the United States will decide




the_bee
02-21-2008, 07:36 PM
This Friday, Feb. 22nd:
SCOTUS To Reconsider Landmark WTP v. US
Next Sunday: Schulz to Speak in MA

On Friday, February 22 the Supreme Court of the United States will decide Bob Schulz?s Petition for Rehearing of its January 7th decision not to hear We the People v. United States, the case demanding a declaration by the Court of the original intent of the last ten words of the First Amendment, to wit: ?Congress shall make no law?abridging the Freedom?or the Right of the People?and to Petition the Government for a Redress of Grievances.?

?The intent of the Framer?s of the Constitution ? our Founding Fathers ? in capping the First Amendment with those ten words is clear to all who take the time to review the historical record,? said Bob Schulz. ?The demonstrable as well as common sense intent was that the clause would provide individuals with a constitutional guarantee of the natural Right (power) of a free People to peacefully hold the Government accountable to each and every provision of the seven Articles and Amendments to the Constitution, without harassment or retaliation by the Government. That is, the exercise of Petitioning for Redress would serve as the non-violent protector of all other Rights, Freedoms and Liberties, forestalling any necessity for individuals to resort to violence in defense of the Constitution.?

Government, the ominous, omniscient enemy of Freedom, does not favor accountability. Our Government is no exception to the rule. This is the only rational explanation for the failure of the Executive and Legislative departments to respond to our Petitions for Redress, and the failure of the Supreme Court to hear our case, i.e., to avoid having to publicly issue an honest declaration of the Rights of the People and the obligations of the Government under the Petition Clause ? the ?government accountability clause.?

The matter is of the utmost importance. Our Constitution is all that stands between a free People and total tyranny.

However, regardless of the prodigious promise of its divine design, the parchment merely sits on the shelf, unable to defend itself, unable on its own to evince and maintain the magnificence of popular sovereignty and a servant government with strictly limited powers.

As it is in the natural order for every government to resist the chains upon its limited powers, it is also a necessity of nature that men remain forever vigilant in holding their governments accountable. This is a solemn responsibility that no People can elude and yet hope to remain free.

Should the Supreme Court continue to sidestep its constitutional duty to interpret the meaning of the last ten words of the First Amendment by denying the instant Petition for Rehearing, Bob Schulz and the We The People Congress will immediately turn their attention and resources to the organization and implementation of large-scale, wide-spread acts of ?civil disobedience.?

A Government that fails to listen or respond to the People is not fit to rule a Free People.

Although our Natural Rights may be abridged or ?forgotten? over time, they remain fundamental forces of Nature that will not be denied. Where governments cannot be held accountable, Freedom cannot exist. As our Founders knew well, the Right to Petition enables the peaceful dominion of Men over the servant governments they create to secure their Rights, Freedoms and Liberties.

Next Sunday, February 24, from noon to 3 PM, Bob Schulz will be at the Colonial Inn in Concord, Massachusetts to discuss the matter at hand. Everyone is encouraged to attend this most serious meeting. There is no charge to attend. WTP will not be providing any food or beverage. The meeting will be all ?business.?

Click here for an event flyer (.pdf). The meeting will be held at:

Sunday, Feb. 24, Noon - 3 PM

Colonial Inn
4848 Monument Square
Concord, MA 01742
(978) 369-9200

In addition, arrangements are underway for Bob to be in Texas and Idaho on weekends in early March for similar purposes. Details soon.

constitutional
02-21-2008, 07:44 PM
Supreme Court threw out the ACLU case on illegal wiretapping. I doubt anything will happen to this one.

kirkblitz
02-21-2008, 07:58 PM
the supreme court is nothing but a joke, why even have it now its useless

FreeTraveler
02-21-2008, 08:14 PM
The Supremes may be a hit inside the beltway, but the songs they've been singing have been treasonous for a long time, IMHO.

bcreps85
02-21-2008, 08:58 PM
IMO, the supreme court shouldn't have the luxury of throwing out high profile cases. Unfortunately when it doesn't want to look stupid for ignoring the constitution, but also doesn't want to change the things that are wrong with the country, they just throw it out.

dirknb@hotmail.com
02-21-2008, 09:50 PM
The Supremes may be a hit inside the beltway, but the songs they've been singing have been treasonous for a long time, IMHO.

That is a no-brainer since the presidents who appoint them have been treasonous for a long time.

greeksta59
02-21-2008, 10:33 PM
Alex Jones says 7 of the 9 judges are pro New world order

Mr. White
02-21-2008, 10:33 PM
There's a reason they decided not to sit on the ACLU case...

Mr. White
02-21-2008, 10:35 PM
Alex Jones says 7 of the 9 judges are pro New world order

lmao. Then it must be true... You really want to know why they rule the way they do? Study the history. 95% of the time their is at least SOME logic to their rulings... it's the 5% that get ya.

IcyPeaceMaker
02-22-2008, 12:47 AM
Montana to secede?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Montana, the Second Amendment and D.C. v. Heller


Explanation for this page:

The United States Supreme Court is considering the case of D.C. v. Heller, the first case in 70 years in which the Court will squarely address the meaning of the Second Amendment. A core question is whether the Second Amendment secures an individual right to keep and bear arms, or if it merely protects a right for the states to arm their National Guards, known as the "collective rights" theory.

Many entities have submitted amicus briefs, but Montana has not been able to submit an amicus concerning the states' contract argument because of time and cost (mostly cost - some of the briefs already submitted in Heller are reputed to have cost over $ 1million).

The purpose of this argument is to demonstrate that if the Court should decide that the Secondment Amendment to be a "collective right" that position will open a can of worms concerning states, and concerning contracts.

The Resolution concurred in by many elected Montana officials is HERE.

The argument about Montana's contract and the Second Amendment is HERE.

The list of officials concurring individually (to date - 02/21/08) in this Resolution is HERE.

Montana Secretary of State Brad Johnson's 2/19/08 letter in the Washington Times is HERE.

Montana Shooting Sports Association's 2/19/08 News Release on this topic is HERE.

This issue in the news:
'Any person' has right to gun, state says Reason Magazine - Hit & Run > Montana: Wrong Heller Decision Would Violate Its Compact with the United States


Louisiana could use the same argument as Montana, here's the Louisiana Constitutional article dealing with The Right to Keep and Bear Arms.



§11. Right to Keep and Bear Arms

Section 11. The right of each citizen to keep and bear arms shall not be abridged, but this provision shall not prevent the passage of laws to prohibit the carrying of weapons concealed on the person.

On February 22nd, the MOST BASIC right of the people is before the S. Ct. on Request for Rehearing, this means they have already refused to hear this case which limits government tyrany.
http://www.wethepeoplefoundation.org...TP-1-31-08.pdf

Preliminary Statment of the Case:
http://www.givemeliberty.org/RTPLaws...mentOfCase.htm

The Complaint:
http://www.givemeliberty.org/RTPLaws...ed-9-15-04.PDF

Supporting affidavit
http://www.givemeliberty.org/RTPLaws...lz-9-15-04.PDF

IcyPeaceMaker
02-22-2008, 02:02 AM
http://www.wethepeoplefoundation.org/UPDATE/Update2008-02-17.htm

February 17, 2008

This Friday, Feb. 22nd:
SCOTUS To Reconsider Landmark WTP v. US
Next Sunday: Schulz to Speak in MA

On Friday, February 22 the Supreme Court of the United States will decide Bob Schulz’s Petition for Rehearing of its January 7th decision not to hear We the People v. United States, the case demanding a declaration by the Court of the original intent of the last ten words of the First Amendment, to wit: “Congress shall make no law…abridging the Freedom…or the Right of the People…and to Petition the Government for a Redress of Grievances.”

“The intent of the Framer’s of the Constitution – our Founding Fathers – in capping the First Amendment with those ten words is clear to all who take the time to review the historical record,” said Bob Schulz. “The demonstrable as well as common sense intent was that the clause would provide individuals with a constitutional guarantee of the natural Right (power) of a free People to peacefully hold the Government accountable to each and every provision of the seven Articles and Amendments to the Constitution, without harassment or retaliation by the Government. That is, the exercise of Petitioning for Redress would serve as the non-violent protector of all other Rights, Freedoms and Liberties, forestalling any necessity for individuals to resort to violence in defense of the Constitution.”

Government, the ominous, omniscient enemy of Freedom, does not favor accountability. Our Government is no exception to the rule. This is the only rational explanation for the failure of the Executive and Legislative departments to respond to our Petitions for Redress, and the failure of the Supreme Court to hear our case, i.e., to avoid having to publicly issue an honest declaration of the Rights of the People and the obligations of the Government under the Petition Clause – the “government accountability clause.”

The matter is of the utmost importance. Our Constitution is all that stands between a free People and total tyranny.

However, regardless of the prodigious promise of its divine design, the parchment merely sits on the shelf, unable to defend itself, unable on its own to evince and maintain the magnificence of popular sovereignty and a servant government with strictly limited powers.

As it is in the natural order for every government to resist the chains upon its limited powers, it is also a necessity of nature that men remain forever vigilant in holding their governments accountable. This is a solemn responsibility that no People can elude and yet hope to remain free.

Should the Supreme Court continue to sidestep its constitutional duty to interpret the meaning of the last ten words of the First Amendment by denying the instant Petition for Rehearing, Bob Schulz and the We The People Congress will immediately turn their attention and resources to the organization and implementation of large-scale, wide-spread acts of “civil disobedience.”

A Government that fails to listen or respond to the People is not fit to rule a Free People.

Although our Natural Rights may be abridged or “forgotten” over time, they remain fundamental forces of Nature that will not be denied. Where governments cannot be held accountable, Freedom cannot exist. As our Founders knew well, the Right to Petition enables the peaceful dominion of Men over the servant governments they create to secure their Rights, Freedoms and Liberties.

IPSecure
02-22-2008, 03:32 PM
Any Update? Checked all news sites...


Taking America Back!

http://www.givemeliberty.org/
http://www.wethepeoplefoundation.org/
http://wethepeoplecongress.org/ (New)

IPSecure
02-28-2008, 10:08 AM
SCOTUS Says “NO”! What Must A Free People Do? We have NO Redress!

On February 25, 2008, the Supreme Court of the United States, without comment, voted again not to hear We The People v. United States. Thus, SCOTUS ducked its Constitutional duty, yet again, to declare the meaning of the last ten words of the First Amendment.

The Court elected not to be put into the position of having to declare the unalienable Right of the People to hold the Government accountable to the Constitution’s essential principles, enumerated powers and explicit prohibitions.

Instead, the Court has chosen to conspire with the political branches in a collective decision to protect, preserve and enhance the treasonous notion that constitutional violations are mere issues of current public policy, subject only to the will of the majority of People voting in precincts and the halls of Congress.

Beginning this Saturday, March 1st, Bob Schulz will be speaking at various venues to discuss the matter at hand. Everyone is encouraged to attend one of these most serious meetings. There is no charge to attend. WTP will not be providing any food or beverage. The meeting will be all “business.”

We The People Foundation For Constitutional Education
http://givemeliberty.org/