cybloo
02-20-2008, 01:10 PM
I'm sure we are all aware of the horrors of the McCain-Feingold campaign finance reform, that McCain touts as being bipartisan (how is that true when both sides are backed by big money with interest in censoring the people).
From Ron Paul's Website:
The ban essentially prohibits any group from airing radio or television ads that cast politicians in a negative light during the critical final months of an election. The ban even carries the possibility of criminal penalties, meaning the Court has endorsed criminalizing political dissent! Incumbent politicians certainly will be the beneficiaries of the new ban, as they no longer have to suffer through ads that criticize their performance.
So, this is my question to you - even with the threat of being labeled a criminal, would you go to prison to defend your belief in our liberties?
If you don't know much about this, please read Ron Paul's article (http://www.ronpaul2008.com/articles/1029/campaign-finance-reform%e2%80%9d-muzzles-political-dissent/) about the issue.
My answer is quite emphatically yes.
From Ron Paul's Website:
The ban essentially prohibits any group from airing radio or television ads that cast politicians in a negative light during the critical final months of an election. The ban even carries the possibility of criminal penalties, meaning the Court has endorsed criminalizing political dissent! Incumbent politicians certainly will be the beneficiaries of the new ban, as they no longer have to suffer through ads that criticize their performance.
So, this is my question to you - even with the threat of being labeled a criminal, would you go to prison to defend your belief in our liberties?
If you don't know much about this, please read Ron Paul's article (http://www.ronpaul2008.com/articles/1029/campaign-finance-reform%e2%80%9d-muzzles-political-dissent/) about the issue.
My answer is quite emphatically yes.