The Destruction of America

[IcyPeaceMaker]

Why have the Jews been hated universally throughout recorded history?

The Destruction of America - part I of IV
Is it happening by chance...or...Is our nation blindly following the plan of a small but powerful group of wealthy International Bankers who are determined to rule over us as slaves in the coming ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT, THE "NEW WORLD ORDER?" After years of study, we have become convinced that there is an internationalist plot to create a one world government and destroy American sovereignty. The Internationalists behind this plot are working in secrecy. Why? Because they know that if too many Americans wake up and learn the truth about what has been happening to our nation, and if a large number of Americans found out who the enemy really is, and if they found out how the enemy is doing his work, then these patriotic Americans would rise up and destroy those who are behind this diabolical plot.

- 1 For centuries a small but powerful clique has been working towards the day when they will be able to force the United States and the nations of the world to submit to a one world government. The United Nations is a mere pawn in the arsenal of these conspirators. They are planning for the day when they can compel the American people and the nations of the world to accept a one world monetary system, which they will control, as a precursor to a one world government run by the slave masters in charge of us in the NEW WORLD ORDER.

- 2 From the beginning they have known that in order to enslave us they would have to de-christianize America. They have been very successful at eliminating Christianity and the Bible as the moral compass of our nation. They have succeeded by using the federal courts which they ideologically dominate to remove Christianity and Bible study from our schools and all public institutions. It has been their plan to promote a breakdown of our families and our morality and they have been very successful in this regard. How have they done it? They exercise near complete control over Hollywood, Television and nearly all print and publishing media. They continuously produce obscene films and lascivious television shows, intentionally flooding our nation and our minds with pornographic images for the express purpose of destroying the moral fiber of our people. They have used the ACLU to remove every last vestige of God and Christianity from the public arena.

- 3 In 1913 International Bankers created our national banking system, better known as the Federal Reserve System. Using banks that they have privately owned for centuries they created the Federal Reserve System as a vehicle by which to steal our nations entire supply of gold and they have left us holding paper money that will ultimately become worthless. They have used the IRS to intimidate us with financial ruin if we dare to resist their tyrannical system of taxation.

- 4 U.S. Congressman Charles Lindbergh Senior, said in 1913 regarding the Federal Reserve Act, "This act establishes the most gigantic trust (monopoly) on earth. When the President (Wilson) signs the act, the invisible government by the money power, proven to exist by the Money Trust Investigation, will be legalized. The new law will create inflation whenever the trusts want inflation. From now on depression will be scientifically created. The worst legislative crime of the ages is perpetrated by this banking and currency bill." Ignoring warnings from such patriotic men in 1913 President Woodrow Wilson approved the Federal Reserve Act concentrating control of America's money in the hands of the small group of men who dominate this private corporation. A decade later the former President, Woodrow Wilson, opined, "I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial Nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated (centralized). The growth of the Nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated Governments in the world -- no longer a Government of free opinion, no longer a Government by conviction and vote of the majority, but a Government by the opinion and duress of small groups of dominant men." Years earlier Woodrow Wilson had said the following; "There's a power so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so pervasive, so interlocked, that you'd better not speak above your breath when you mention it, in condemnation of it."

- 5 Baron M. A. Rothschild said in the 18th century " Give me control over a nations currency, and I care not who makes the laws." One Hundred Years later President James A. Garfield (who was later assassinated) echoed Baron M.A. Rothschild when he said "Whoever controls the volume of money in any country is absolute master of all commerce and industry." Those in control of the New World Order have been orchestrating this plan for centuries and they have shrewdly understood that control of the monetary systems of all nations is the key to implementing iron fisted control over the nations of the world. Nobel Prize winning economist, Paul Samuelson wrote in Economics, Fourth Edition."The Federal Reserve is an omnipotent, benevolent counterfeiter." We agree with Samuelson that the Fed is an omnipotent counterfeiter, however it is most certainly not "benevolent."

- 6 An integral part of the plan for world domination is the dumbing down of the average American. Those who are behind this push for one world government have used the public schools to indoctrinate our children in anti-Christian ideas and anti-American ideology. The public schools have been their primary weapon in the war to destroy our children's future, indoctrinating them in liberalism and by intentionally giving them a substandard education. The ability of all Americans to read, to think and to reason clearly is at an all time low. One reason for this is because the public schools refuse to use phonics to teach children how to read. Why? Because colleges of education financed by the Rockefeller foundation do not teach the teachers of tomorrow the phonics method of reading instruction. Instead they use the "Look - Say" method which has proved a dismal failure (just as they planned?). Presently the public schools are more interested in teaching our children about condoms than mathematics. Why? Because those who are in control of the educational establishment know that they must demoralize and "dumb down" America before they can disarm us, suspend the United States Constitution and put us under their absolute control.

- 7 Who are the people behind this powerful push for a One World Government? Generally speaking they are liberals. They are socialists, communists, union leaders, atheists, humanists, feminists, homosexuals, hedonists, bureaucrats and environmental extremists who worship the creation more than the Creator. However, the people at the very top, the movers and shakers, the absolute leaders, the wealthiest and the most influential people who live on the pinnacles of fabulous wealth and exercise real power as agents of the NEW WORLD ORDER in the innermost circles of international politics are bankers, specifically Jewish International Bankers.

- 8 Every thing written in this tract is 100% factual. If you will take the time to do the research you can verify it all in your local library. One of the most famous Americans to write extensively about the power of the Jewish Internationalists was the renowned auto maker Henry Ford. He spent millions of dollars paying researchers to investigate the activities and objectives of these International Jews. He wrote a series of newspaper articles in the "Dearborn Independent" in June of 1920 that are timeless and very much worthwhile reading today. Mr. Ford's book "The International Jew" may still be found in some libraries.

- 9 In 1920 Henry Ford, in an article written for the "Dearborn Independent Newspaper", wrote the following; - "How does the Jew so habitually and so resistlessly gravitate to the highest places? What puts him there? Why is he put there? What does he do there? What does the fact of his being there mean to the world? That is the Jewish Question in its origin. Fifty years ago, international banking, which was mostly in control of Jews as the money brokers of the world, was on top of business. It exercised the super-control of governments and finance everywhere. The significance of this is that the type does not grow anywhere else than on a Jewish stem. There is no other racial or national type which puts forth this kind of person. It is not merely that there are a few Jews among international financial controllers; it is that these world controllers are exclusively Jews. Since world-control is an ambition which has only been achieved by Jews, and not by any of the methods usually adopted by would-be world conquerors, it becomes inevitable that the question should center in that remarkable race." A few years later Mr. Ford said "It is well enough that the people of the nation do not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning." In his book "The International Jew" Henry Ford Sr. wrote the following; "When the powerful Jew is at last traced and his hand revealed, then comes the ready cry of persecution and it echoes through the world press. The real cause of the persecution (which is the oppression of the people by the financial practices of the Jews) is never given publicity." End of Henry Ford Quotes.

-10 Due the unhappy convergence of certain circumstances in history regarding the catholic church and unbiblical interpretations regarding the lending of money at interest, Jews have dominated the banking industry for more than one thousand years. Remember when you studied the "Magna Carta" (The Great Charter) in school. The Magna Carta was signed at Runnymede in 1215 by King John, at the demand of his barons. This Great Charter was a landmark for the preservation of the rights of Englishmen.

-11 The Magna Carta is said to contain the origins of the Declaration of Independence and the Bill of Rights. Written in Latin, its English translation reveals to Americans the struggle that is not new to our people. In 1215, the struggle against government's tyranny and oppression was no different than today. - The main grievance redressed by The Magna Carta was the administration's policy of extortionate taxation and financial plunder of the citizens. It also addressed the English Freeman's rights to trial by jury, Habeas Corpus, no arbitrary search and seizure, and equality before the law. - Articles ten and eleven addressed usury and gave protection against foreclosure by ruthless usurers:

10. If anyone who has borrowed from the JEWS any amount great or small, dies before the debt is repaid, it shall not carry interest as long as the heir is under age, or whomsoever he holds; and if that debt fall into our hands, we will take nothing except the principal sum specified in the bond.

11. And if a man dies owing a debt to the JEWS, his wife may have her dower and pay nothing of that debt; and if he leaves children under age, their needs shall be met in a manner in keeping with the holding of the deceased; and the debt shall be paid out of the residue, saving the service due to the lords. Debts owing to others than Jews shall be dealt with likewise. Nearly 800 years ago our ancestors warned us about Jewish usury via the Magna Carta. In these two articles excerpted the Magna Carta, we see that there is nothing new under the sun. Banking and usury is synonymous with Jewry.

-12 Today, Jewish bankers control the United States Federal Reserve and hence the economy of our nation. According to the renowned Christian economist and author, R.E. McMaster, our Federal Reserve System is owned and run by eight Jewish families. Only three of the eight families in the following list are American; Rothschild's of London, Lazard Brothers of Paris, Israel-Moses Seif Bank of Italy, Kuhn-Loeb of Germany, Warburg of Hamburg, Lechman Brothers of New York, Goldman-Sachs of New York and the Rockefellers of New York. (Some scholars theorize that J.F.K. was assassinated by agents of the NEW WORLD ORDER because he had defied these International Bankers by issuing an order shortly before his death to print non-Federal Reserve U.S. Treasury Notes. If it is true that JFK indeed ordered the treasury to do this, it would have destroyed the Federal Reserve System. You must remember that JFK's father was widely reputed to be an outspoken anti-Semite.)

Here are some facts, that you may have been unaware of, about Jews:

Did you know that Jews have always been in the forefront, leading the fight in previous sessions of the United States Congress, to abolish the second amendment of the United States Constitution one step at a time by a process known as gradualism? Liberal Jews are determined to disarm the American people. They want to take away all of the guns, even those of law abiding Americans. Prominent Jewish politicians like Congressman Charles Schumer of New York, Senator Carl Levin of Michigan, Senator Diane Feinstein of California, Senator Barbara Boxer of California and former Senator Howard Metzenbaum of Ohio, are just a few of the numerous liberal Jews who have and who are presently leading the fight in the United States Congress to disarm the American people.

-13 Did you know that the head of the ACLU in Michigan, Howard Simon, is a Jew? Did you know that the current national director of the ACLU is a Jewish woman by the name of Nadine Strossen? Did you know that the previous national director of the ACLU, Ira Glasser, is a Jew?

Did you know that Jews outright own or through interlocking directorates exercise complete control over all of the major media outlets, such as US News and World Report, Time magazine, The New York Times, The Washington Post, ABC, NBC, and CBS? Here is what the former Vice President of the United States Spiro Agnew said on this subject over 20 years ago: ""The people who own and manage national impact media are Jewish and, with other influential Jews, helped create a disastrous U.S. Mideast policy. All you have to do is check the real policy makers and owners and you find a much higher concentration of Jewish people than you're going to find in the population. By national impact media I am referring to the major news wire services, pollsters, Time and Newsweek Magazines, the New York Times, Washington Post, and the International Herald Tribune. For example, CBS' Mr. (William) Paley's Jewish. Mr. Julian Goodman, who runs NBC, and there's a Leonard Goldenson at ABC. Mrs. Katherine Graham owns the Washington Post and Mr. Sulzberger the New York Times. They are all Jews!"

-14 Did you know that most of the extreme left wing political action groups in America today are run by Jews and/or were founded by Jews? The following list of left wing political action groups were all founded by and or are currently headed by Jews; "Americans United for Separation of Church and State" (Barry Lynn, founder).

"Act Up" (Larry Kramer, founder), a homosexual activist organization. ACLU, "American Civil Liberties Union", an extreme left wing collection of lawyers. NAACP, "National Association for the Advancement of Colored People" (Joel Spingarn, founder), a left wing civil rights organization, PAW, "People for the American Way" (Ed Asner, co-founder), NOW, "National Organization of Women". The National Organization of Women was primarily founded by a Jewish woman by the name of Betty Friedan. Today the National Organization of Women is presided over by lesbians and feminists like Eleanor Smeal, Judy Goldsmith and Gloria Steinem all of whom are Jewish.

-15 Furthermore, most of the prominent authors in the feminist movement are Jewish women. Why? Because Jew's control the publishing industry and because Jewish women hate the Patriarchy taught in both the Old Testament and the New Testament. They hate the Patriarchy of Abraham and Moses and the Patriarchy of Jesus and the Apostle Paul. Have you ever noticed that most of the male homosexuals who appear on TV shows are Jewish? Did you know that, in a blatant and blasphemous rejection of God's Word, there are many Jewish Synagogues that specifically "minister" to and are almost exclusively attended by homosexuals? Did you know that the leader of the militant homosexual activist group "ACT-UP" is an angry Jewish homosexual named Larry Kramer? Did you know that 4 members of "ACT-UP" have started the even worse group "***** Nation" who gain publicity by engaging in staging radical homosexual "kiss-in's" at various public events? Another influential Homosexual activist group is "GLAAD." GLAAD is the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation and it was founded by openly gay playwright and actor Harvey Fierstein. Did you know that the Jewish Poet Allan Ginsberg (who the liberal, Jewish controlled media, celebrated as a genius) was a notorious child molester. The infamous poet, Ginsberg, was a pederast who had a preference for little boys? It is demonstrably true that the Jews who control Hollywood love to make films that mock Christianity and undermine religious faith. Why? Because they are vociferously nti-Christ.

-16 Another example of Hollywood Jews hatred for America, morality and Christianity can be seen in the take over of Disney movie studios by Michael Eisner. Eisner has sullied the Disney name by releasing a flood of immoral, pro-homosexual, anti-Christian movies in the last few years. This is why the Southern Baptists and most mainstream Christian denominations have voted to boycott Disney movies and Disney theme parks. Did you know that the C.E.O. of the movie studio that made the blasphemous film "The Last Temptation of Christ" was a Jew by the name of Lew Wasserman? What would the Jews do if a Christian director made a movie mocking the holocaust? The Jews can make movies that viciously mock everything that we hold sacred but if you dare to question the Hollywood version of the holocaust they will do everything in their power to ruin your life.

-17 Have you ever noticed that most of the major companies that produce hard core pornographic films and magazines are owned or controlled by Jews? Not only in Hollywood but in the underworld of the Jewish Mafia. Bosses such as the late "Bugsy" Siegel and Meyer Lansky are infamously known for their involvement in both prostitution and the production of pornographic films. Meyer Lansky was known as the "Godfather of the Godfathers" and "The Mafia's Banker." Lansky once bragged "We are bigger than U.S. Steel." "Bugsy" Siegel, a Jew, was the creator of Las Vegas. Las Vegas was completely, absolutely a creation of organized crime syndicates controlled by Jews. Jews have made huge sums of money, hundreds of billions of dollars, in this nation by promoting and profiting from the "gambling industry" in Las Vegas and other cities to which this cancer has spread. They have made billions more trafficking in pornography, illegal liquor, prostitution and drugs. Jews like Samuel Bronfman and his son's, who are the billionaire owners of the Seagrams Whiskey conglomerate, started out during prohibition selling illegal whiskey in the USA. The truth is, Jews controlled organized crime, not Italians, as Hollywood has told the story. Did you ever notice that Jewish producers and directors dominate the pornographic movie industry? There is no doubt that these liberal atheist Jews are a cancer in Christian America. But the truth of their despicable activities are concealed from the average American citizen.

-18 Did you know that it was Jewish bankers in New York City, like Jacob Schiff, et al, who gave the Marxist Leninists Twenty Million Dollars ($500 million in 1998 dollars) to finance a Communist Revolution in Russia in 1917. By this single treacherous act, the Jewish International Bankers involved in this plot have made themselves responsible for the deaths of all the hundreds of millions of innocents slaughtered by Communists around the world? It is a fact that communism was originally known by most people as "Jewish Bolshevism." HILAIRE BELLOC, renowned historian in G. K.'s WEEKLY, February 4, 1937 wrote "The propaganda of Communism throughout the world, in organization and direction is in the hands of Jewish agents. As for anyone who does not know that the Bolshevist movement in Russia is Jewish, I can only say that he must be a man who is taken in by the suppression of our deplorable press." Did you know that almost all of the major players in the formative years of the communist ideology were Jews? Did you know that Karl Marx and Trotsky were Jews. Lenin's grandfather was Jewish. In America the leader of the communist party for decades was a Jew by the name of Gus Hall. Jew's in every nation have been the leaders and financiers of communism throughout the history of the 19th and 20th century. Here is what the famous journalist and playright Myron Fagon had to say on this subject in a remarkable speech he gave in the 1960's; "Now there's only one question and that is to prove that the communist regime is directly controlled by the American Jacob Schiff and London Rothschild masterminds of the great conspiracy. A little later I will provide that proof that will remove even a remote doubt that the Communist Party, as we know it, was created by those masterminds (capitalists if you will note); that Schiff, the Warburgs, and the Rothschilds planned and financed the entire Russian Revolution, the murder of the Czar and his family, and that Lenin, Trotsky, and Stalin took their orders directly from Schiff and the other capitalists whom they supposedly are fighting.

[HazardPerry]

:eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::eek::rolleyes:

[Malum Prohibitum]

Um. Racism is bad, mmkay?

[IcyPeaceMaker]

Diagnosing a sickness is not racism. The above is true and is not posted to condescend jews, but to inform the public as to what has happened to America. This is not to say that all jews are bad, but to relate that those individuals who are excessively overrepresented in banking and media are evil people who are destroying our nation. Truth is not prejudice.

[Live_Free_Or_Die]

nt

[IcyPeaceMaker]

Religion, Politics, and the Constitution (Part II)


Curtis W. Caine, MD


This column on the Constitution appears in the Medical Sentinel to remind us that it is the unConstitutional (and thus illegal) activities in medicine and all other facets of our lives that have trampled on and outlawed our God-endowed freedom and liberty.


The Founders/writers/signers of the Constitution of this Republic knew this, believed it, wrote/spoke of it. George Washington, the Father of America, in his farewell address (delivered September 17, 1796) said "Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality are indispensable supports." John Adams said "Our Constitution was made only for a moral and righteous people. It is wholly inadequate for the governance of any other."

The same must be said for the family and home.

In a review of "15,000 items written by the Founding Fathers, including newspaper articles, magazines, books, pamphlets, etc., the Bible was the most frequently noted source."(1) And Gouverneur Morris, writer of the final draft of the Constitution of the(se) United States,(2) stated, "Religion is the only solid basis of good morals, therefore education should teach the precepts of religion, and the duties of man toward God."(3)

To avert a "cease and desist" court order being posted on churches participating in "politics," lets label it by its correct name --- "righteous people being active in civil government." Here we are, back to semantics, lexicology, etymology.

God, Himself, instituted civil government and charged the magistrates to implement His Law --- the law, the magistrates, and civil government (all three) being accountable to Him.

Two New Testament scriptures establish this thesis: The Triune God is 1) "...the...only Potentate, the King of kings, and Lord of lords;..." (1 Tim 6:15 KJV), and 2) "...ruler (prince) of the kings of the earth," (Revelation 1:5 ASV-NIV-RSV-KJV).

You see, earthly kings rule their civil governments ("politics," if you will), but the King of kings rules the rulers of civil governments, so HE and HIS Law are over (rule) civil governments. Therefore, God in the Old and New Testaments is involved in civil government ("politics"). And when earthly kings/magistrates do not administer God's law it is up to God's people (ambassadors, emissaries, representatives, rabbis, priests, preachers, servants, stewards) and His churches and synagogues to set things straight. They did so two and three centuries ago. And to restore sanity, integrity, morality, uprightness, justice to the civil order today they/we must do so again, now. In these United States that is done Constitutionally by the citizens instructing their elected representatives in local, state, and national office to obey God's Law. When these representatives do not obey God's Law, the Constitution provides the citizens a mechanism for correction at the ballot box every two, four, and six years. And, there is also impeachment and recall. It is this process that is erroneously, derisively cited as "politics" that we are told is verboten in/by a church. Properly referred to as "being active in civil affairs," God's people, His devotees, inside and outside of a church are obligated to hold their elected Representa-tives' feet to the fire.

God's people are to learn God's Law directly from personal study of Scripture, and indirectly through instruction in their churches and synagogues, so they can/will apply it as informed voters. One of the results of churches and synagogues "staying out of politics" leaves voters less prepared to determine the thus saith the Lord's right or wrong on issues, whereby their vote devolves to deciding which candidate is the most handsome and telegenic, or which is the lesser evil, when "none of the above" is fit for office.

I am also cited the "great commission" (Matt 28:19-20), as confirmation that churches and pastors are to present only the "good news" of the "gospel," abstaining from "politics." Hold on a minute! Verse 19 does instruct us to spread the gospel. But there are two verses in the reference. Both verses constitute the "great commission." And verse 20 reads "Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you": KJV. Aha! Ergo, we are commissioned to teach ALL of God's Law in and out of the church and in and out of the pulpit. Consequently, that includes matters pertaining to civil government. "Politics," if you insist.

Let's hear no more of "the church is to have nothing to do with politics" and again have churches, pastors, and church members, aggressively "active in civil government," restoring this Republic(4) to its proper foundation and order --- civil government under The Sovereign.

[IcyPeaceMaker]

Little-Known U.S. Document Signed by President Adams Proclaims America's Government Is Secular
by Jim Walker

A few Christian fundamentalists attempt to convince us to return to the Christianity of early America, yet according to the historian, Robert T. Handy, "No more than 10 percent-- probably less-- of Americans in 1800 were members of congregations."

The Founding Fathers, also, rarely practiced Christian orthodoxy. Although they supported the free exercise of any religion, they understood the dangers of religion. Most of them believed in deism and attended Freemasonry lodges. According to John J. Robinson, "Freemasonry had been a powerful force for religious freedom." Freemasons took seriously the principle that men should worship according to their own conscious. Masonry welcomed anyone from any religion or non-religion, as long as they believed in a Supreme Being. Washington, Franklin, Hancock, Hamilton, Lafayette, and many others accepted Freemasonry.


The Constitution reflects our founders views of a secular government, protecting the freedom of any belief or unbelief. The historian, Robert Middlekauff, observed, "the idea that the Constitution expressed a moral view seems absurd. There were no genuine evangelicals in the Convention, and there were no heated declarations of Christian piety."

George Washington
Much of the myth of Washington's alleged Christianity came from Mason Weems influential book, "Life of Washington." The story of the cherry tree comes from this book and it has no historical basis. Weems, a Christian minister portrayed Washington as a devout Christian, yet Washington's own diaries show that he rarely attended Church.

Washington revealed almost nothing to indicate his spiritual frame of mind, hardly a mark of a devout Christian. In his thousands of letters, the name of Jesus Christ never appears. He rarely spoke about his religion, but his Freemasonry experience points to a belief in deism. Washington's initiation occurred at the Fredericksburg Lodge on 4 November 1752, later becoming a Master mason in 1799, and remained a freemason until he died.

To the United Baptist Churches in Virginia in May, 1789, Washington said that every man "ought to be protected in worshipping the Deity according to the dictates of his own conscience."

After Washington's death, Dr. Abercrombie, a friend of his, replied to a Dr. Wilson, who had interrogated him about Washington's religion replied, "Sir, Washington was a Deist."

Thomas Jefferson
Even most Christians do not consider Jefferson a Christian. In many of his letters, he denounced the superstitions of Christianity. He did not believe in spiritual souls, angels or godly miracles. Although Jefferson did admire the morality of Jesus, Jefferson did not think him divine, nor did he believe in the Trinity or the miracles of Jesus. In a letter to Peter Carr, 10 August 1787, he wrote, "Question with boldness even the existence of a god."

Jefferson believed in materialism, reason, and science. He never admitted to any religion but his own. In a letter to Ezra Stiles Ely, 25 June 1819, he wrote, "You say you are a Calvinist. I am not. I am of a sect by myself, as far as I know."

John Adams
John AdamsAdams, a Unitarian, flatly denied the doctrine of eternal damnation. In a letter to Thomas Jefferson, he wrote:

"I almost shudder at the thought of alluding to the most fatal example of the abuses of grief which the history of mankind has preserved -- the Cross. Consider what calamities that engine of grief has produced!"

In his letter to Samuel Miller, 8 July 1820, Adams admitted his unbelief of Protestant Calvinism: "I must acknowledge that I cannot class myself under that denomination."

In his, "A Defence of the Constitutions of Government of the United States of America" [1787-1788], John Adams wrote:

"The United States of America have exhibited, perhaps, the first example of governments erected on the simple principles of nature; and if men are now sufficiently enlightened to disabuse themselves of artifice, imposture, hypocrisy, and superstition, they will consider this event as an era in their history. Although the detail of the formation of the American governments is at present little known or regarded either in Europe or in America, it may hereafter become an object of curiosity. It will never be pretended that any persons employed in that service had interviews with the gods, or were in any degree under the influence of Heaven, more than those at work upon ships or houses, or laboring in merchandise or agriculture; it will forever be acknowledged that these governments were contrived merely by the use of reason and the senses.

". . . Thirteen governments [of the original states] thus founded on the natural authority of the people alone, without a pretence of miracle or mystery, and which are destined to spread over the northern part of that whole quarter of the globe, are a great point gained in favor of the rights of mankind."

James Madison
Called the father of the Constitution, Madison had no conventional sense of Christianity. In 1785, Madison wrote in his Memorial and Remonstrance against Religious Assessments:

"During almost fifteen centuries has the legal establishment of Christianity been on trial. What have been its fruits? More or less in all places, pride and indolence in the Clergy, ignorance and servility in the laity; in both, superstition, bigotry and persecution."

"What influence, in fact, have ecclesiastical establishments had on society? In some instances they have been seen to erect a spiritual tyranny on the ruins of the civil authority; on many instances they have been seen upholding the thrones of political tyranny; in no instance have they been the guardians of the liberties of the people. Rulers who wish to subvert the public liberty may have found an established clergy convenient auxiliaries. A just government, instituted to secure and perpetuate it, needs them not."

Benjamin Franklin
Although Franklin received religious training, his nature forced him to rebel against the irrational tenets of his parents Christianity. His Autobiography revels his skepticism, "My parents had given me betimes religions impressions, and I received from my infancy a pious education in the principles of Calvinism. But scarcely was I arrived at fifteen years of age, when, after having doubted in turn of different tenets, according as I found them combated in the different books that I read, I began to doubt of Revelation itself.

". . . Some books against Deism fell into my hands. . . It happened that they wrought an effect on my quite contrary to what was intended by them; for the arguments of the Deists, which were quoted to be refuted, appeared to me much stronger than the refutations; in short, I soon became a through Deist."

In an essay on "Toleration," Franklin wrote:

"If we look back into history for the character of the present sects in Christianity, we shall find few that have not in their turns been persecutors, and complainers of persecution. The primitive Christians thought persecution extremely wrong in the Pagans, but practiced it on one another. The first Protestants of the Church of England blamed persecution in the Romish church, but practiced it upon the Puritans. These found it wrong in the Bishops, but fell into the same practice themselves both here [England] and in New England."

Dr. Priestley, an intimate friend of Franklin, wrote of him:

"It is much to be lamented that a man of Franklin's general good character and great influence should have been an unbeliever in Christianity, and also have done as much as he did to make others unbelievers" (Priestley's Autobiography)

Thomas Paine

This freethinker and author of several books, influenced more early Americans than any other writer. Although he held Deist beliefs, he wrote in his famous The Age of Reason:

"I do not believe in the creed professed by the Jewish church, by the Roman church, by the Greek church, by the Protestant church, nor by any church that I know of. My own mind is my church. "

"Of all the systems of religion that ever were invented, there is no more derogatory to the Almighty, more unedifiying to man, more repugnant to reason, and more contradictory to itself than this thing called Christianity. "

The U.S. Constitution
The most convincing evidence that our government did not ground itself upon Christianity comes from the very document that defines it-- the United States Constitution.

If indeed our Framers had aimed to found a Christian republic, it would seem highly unlikely that they would have forgotten to leave out their Christian intentions in the Supreme law of the land. In fact, nowhere in the Constitution do we have a single mention of Christianity, God, Jesus, or any Supreme Being. There occurs only two references to religion and they both use exclusionary wording. The 1st Amendment's says, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion. . ." and in Article VI, Section 3, ". . . no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States."

Thomas Jefferson interpreted the 1st Amendment in his famous letter to the Danbury Baptist Association in January 1, 1802:

"I contemplate with sovereign reverence that act of the whole American people which declared that their legislature should 'make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof,' thus building a wall of separation between church and State."

Some Religious activists try to extricate the concept of separation between church and State by claiming that those words do not occur in the Constitution. Indeed they do not, but neither does it exactly say "freedom of religion," yet the First Amendment implies both.

As Thomas Jefferson wrote in his Autobiography, in reference to the Virginia Act for Religious Freedom:

"Where the preamble declares, that coercion is a departure from the plan of the holy author of our religion, an amendment was proposed by inserting "Jesus Christ," so that it would read "A departure from the plan of Jesus Christ, the holy author of our religion;" the insertion was rejected by the great majority, in proof that they meant to comprehend, within the mantle of its protection, the Jew and the Gentile, the Christian and Mohammedan, the Hindoo and Infidel of every denomination."

James Madison, perhaps the greatest supporter for separation of church and State, and whom many refer to as the father of the Constitution, also held similar views which he expressed in his letter to Edward Livingston, 10 July 1822:

"And I have no doubt that every new example will succeed, as every past one has done, in shewing that religion & Govt will both exist in greater purity, the less they are mixed together."

Today, if ever our government needed proof that the separation of church and State works to ensure the freedom of religion, one only need to look at the plethora of Churches, temples, and shrines that exist in the cities and towns throughout the United States. Only a secular government, divorced from religion could possibly allow such tolerant diversity.

The Declaration of Independence
Many Christians who think of America as founded upon Christianity usually present the Declaration as "proof." The reason appears obvious: the document mentions God. However, the God in the Declaration does not describe Christianity's God. It describes "the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God." This nature's view of God agrees with deist philosophy but any attempt to use the Declaration as a support for Christianity will fail for this reason alone.

Article XI from the Treaty of Tripoli More significantly, the Declaration does not represent the law of the land as it came before the Constitution. The Declaration aimed at announcing their separation from Great Britain and listed the various grievances with the "thirteen united States of America." The grievances against Great Britain no longer hold, and we have more than thirteen states. Today, the Declaration represents an important historical document about rebellious intentions against Great Britain at a time before the formation of our independent government. Although the Declaration may have influential power, it may inspire the lofty thoughts of poets, and judges may mention it in their summations, it holds no legal power today. Our presidents, judges and policemen must take an oath to uphold the Constitution, but never to the Declaration of Independence.

Of course the Declaration depicts a great political document, as it aimed at a future government upheld by citizens instead of a religious monarchy. It observed that all men "are created equal" meaning that we all come inborn with the abilities of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That "to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men." The Declaration says nothing about our rights secured by Christianity, nor does it imply anything about a Christian foundation.

Treaty of Tripoli
Unlike governments of the past, the American Fathers set up a government divorced from religion. The establishment of a secular government did not require a reflection to themselves about its origin; they knew this as an unspoken given. However, as the U.S. delved into international affairs, few foreign nations knew about the intentions of America. For this reason, an insight from at a little known but legal document written in the late 1700s explicitly reveals the secular nature of the United States to a foreign nation. Officially called the "Treaty of peace and friendship between the United States of America and the Bey and Subjects of Tripoli, of Barbary," most refer to it as simply the Treaty of Tripoli. In Article 11, it states:

Joel Barlow, U.S. Consul General of Algiers
Copyright National Portait Gallery Smithsonian Institution/Art Resource NY "As the Government of the United States of America is not in any sense founded on the Christian religion; as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquillity, of Musselmen; and as the said States never have entered into any war or act of hostility against any Mehomitan nation, it is declared by the parties that no pretext arising from religious opinions shall ever produce an interruption of the harmony existing between the two countries."

The preliminary treaty began with a signing on 4 November, 1796 (the end of George Washington's last term as president). Joel Barlow, the American diplomat served as counsel to Algiers and held responsibility for the treaty negotiations. Barlow had once served under Washington as a chaplain in the revolutionary army. He became good friends with Paine, Jefferson, and read Enlightenment literature. Later he abandoned Christian orthodoxy for rationalism and became an advocate of secular government. Barlow, along with his associate, Captain Richard O'Brien, et al, translated and modified the Arabic version of the treaty into English. From this came the added Amendment 11. Barlow forwarded the treaty to U.S. legislators for approval in 1797. Timothy Pickering, the secretary of state, endorsed it and John Adams concurred (now during his presidency), sending the document on to the Senate. The Senate approved the treaty on June 7, 1797, and officially ratified by the Senate with John Adams signature on 10 June, 1797. All during this multi-review process, the wording of Article 11 never raised the slightest concern. The treaty even became public through its publication in The Philadelphia Gazette on 17 June 1797.

So here we have a clear admission by the United States that our government did not found itself upon Christianity. Unlike the Declaration of Independence, this treaty represented U.S. law as all treaties do according to the Constitution (see Article VI, Sect. 2).

Although the Christian exclusionary wording in the Treaty of Tripoli only lasted for eight years and no longer has legal status, it clearly represented the feelings of our Founding Fathers at the beginning of the U.S. government.

Common Law
Signers of the Treaty of Tripoli According to the Constitution's 7th Amendment: "In suits at common law. . . the right of trial by jury shall be preserved; and no fact, tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any court of the United States than according to the rules of the common law."

Here, many Christians believe that common law came from Christian foundations and therefore the Constitution derives from it. They use various quotes from Supreme Court Justices proclaiming that Christianity came as part of the laws of England, and therefore from its common law heritage.

But one of our principle Founding Fathers, Thomas Jefferson, elaborated about the history of common law in his letter to Thomas Cooper on February 10, 1814:

"For we know that the common law is that system of law which was introduced by the Saxons on their settlement in England, and altered from time to time by proper legislative authority from that time to the date of Magna Charta, which terminates the period of the common law. . . This settlement took place about the middle of the fifth century. But Christianity was not introduced till the seventh century; the conversion of the first christian king of the Heptarchy having taken place about the year 598, and that of the last about 686. Here then, was a space of two hundred years, during which the common law was in existence, and Christianity no part of it.

". . . if any one chooses to build a doctrine on any law of that period, supposed to have been lost, it is incumbent on him to prove it to have existed, and what were its contents. These were so far alterations of the common law, and became themselves a part of it. But none of these adopt Christianity as a part of the common law. If, therefore, from the settlement of the Saxons to the introduction of Christianity among them, that system of religion could not be a part of the common law, because they were not yet Christians, and if, having their laws from that period to the close of the common law, we are all able to find among them no such act of adoption, we may safely affirm (though contradicted by all the judges and writers on earth) that Christianity neither is, nor ever was a part of the common law."

In the same letter, Jefferson examined how the error spread about Christianity and common law. Jefferson realized that a misinterpretation had occurred with a Latin term by Prisot, "*ancien scripture*," in reference to common law history. The term meant "ancient scripture" but people had incorrectly interpreted it to mean "Holy Scripture," thus spreading the myth that common law came from the Bible. Jefferson writes:

"And Blackstone repeats, in the words of Sir Matthew Hale, that 'Christianity is part of the laws of England,' citing Ventris and Strange ubi surpa. 4. Blackst. 59. Lord Mansfield qualifies it a little by saying that 'The essential principles of revealed religion are part of the common law." In the case of the Chamberlain of London v. Evans, 1767. But he cites no authority, and leaves us at our peril to find out what, in the opinion of the judge, and according to the measure of his foot or his faith, are those essential principles of revealed religion obligatory on us as a part of the common law."

Thus we find this string of authorities, when examined to the beginning, all hanging on the same hook, a perverted expression of Priscot's, or on one another, or nobody."

The Encyclopedia Britannica, also describes the Saxon origin and adds: "The nature of the new common law was at first much influenced by the principles of Roman law, but later it developed more and more along independent lines." Also prominent among the characteristics that derived out of common law include the institution of the jury, and the right to speedy trial.

Christian Sources
Virtually all the evidence that attempts to connect a foundation of Christianity upon the government rests mainly on quotes and opinions from a few of the colonial statesmen who had professed a belief in Christianity. Sometimes the quotes come from their youth before their introduction to Enlightenment ideas or simply from personal beliefs. But statements of beliefs, by themselves, say nothing about Christianity as the source of the U.S. government.

There did occur, however, some who wished a connection between church and State. Patrick Henry, for example, proposed a tax to help sustain "some form of Christian worship" for the state of Virginia. But Jefferson and other statesmen did not agree. In 1779, Jefferson introduced a bill for the Statute for Religious Freedom which became Virginia law. Jefferson designed this law to completely separate religion from government. None of Henry's Christian views ever got introduced into Virginia's or U.S. Government law.

Unfortunately, later developments in our government have clouded early history. The original Pledge of Allegiance, authored by Francis Bellamy in 1892 did not contain the words "under God." Not until June 1954 did those words appear in the Allegiance. The United States currency never had "In God We Trust" printed on money until after the Civil War. Many Christians who visit historical monuments and see the word "God" inscribed in stone, automatically impart their own personal God of Christianity, without understanding the Framers Deist context.

In the Supreme Court's 1892 Holy Trinity Church vs. United States, Justice David Brewer wrote that "this is a Christian nation." Many Christians use this as evidence. However, Brewer wrote this in dicta, as a personal opinion only and does not serve as a legal pronouncement. Later Brewer felt obliged to explain himself: "But in what sense can [the United States] be called a Christian nation? Not in the sense that Christianity is the established religion or the people are compelled in any manner to support it. On the contrary, the Constitution specifically provides that 'Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.' Neither is it Christian in the sense that all its citizens are either in fact or in name Christians. On the contrary, all religions have free scope within its borders. Numbers of our people profess other religions, and many reject all."

Conclusion
The Framers derived an independent government out of Enlightenment thinking against the grievances caused by Great Britain. Our Founders paid little heed to political beliefs about Christianity. The 1st Amendment stands as the bulkhead against an establishment of religion and at the same time insures the free expression of any belief. The Treaty of Tripoli, an instrument of the Constitution, clearly stated our non-Christian foundation. We inherited common law from Great Britain which derived from pre-Christian Saxons rather than from Biblical scripture.

Today we have powerful Christian organizations who work to spread historical myths about early America and attempt to bring a Christian theocracy to the government. If this ever happens, then indeed, we will have ignored the lessons from history. Fortunately, most liberal Christians today agree with the principles of separation of church and State, just as they did in early America.

"They all attributed the peaceful dominion of religion in their country mainly to the separation of church and state. I do not hesitate to affirm that during my stay in America I did not meet a single individual, of the clergy or the laity, who was not of the same opinion on this point"

-Alexis de Tocqueville, Democracy in America, 1835

[IcyPeaceMaker]

This site provides evidence, well researched, of the jews working behind the scenes to monitor and order their agenda. These are the ones who actually control our country and it's destiny:
http://www.biblebelievers.org.au/bushlist.htm

[Live_Free_Or_Die]

nt

[hairball]

well, been there, done that, bought the shirt.

This is the kind of poop that ended up justifyng wholesale, govt instituted murder. You are in good company. This is definately NOT a message Ron would endorse, but hey, if you guys want to help justify some of the hysteria, go right ahead.

[IcyPeaceMaker]

Sorry you feel the need to judge the messengers.

I do the research and post the findings. Anyone who is informed, Ron Paul included, knows the facts of these matters. This is not a racial or religious hit thread, just information which can be used to see things more clearly.

There are those among us who act totally in the dark of night, because if they were seen for what they are, they would be hunted down and killed. Their's is the destruction of America, mine is the salvation of this country and a return to the founding principals which guided us to greatness.

I shine the light, see whatever you will, whatever your PCness will allow. Open your mind or lose the country.

[hairball]

Well, you see, like I said, been there, done that. I find nothing in human nature that has not involved people trying to control others, its a pack thing, we are pack animals. To put it at a jewsih conspiracy is to ignore all the other types that have tried to control their neighbors.

The fact of the matter is that these controls all fail because even the controllers aren't united in their control. Happens over and over again in history.

Someone had posted a link about a jew talking of the jewish conspiracies. Problem was I went and did a search on this character, and found that not only were his histoical facts wrong, he seemed to have a bone to pick with the jews in general. That is a level of pcychology I try to avoid in all but the most personal matters. Suffice it to say, this 'truth' from this 'visionary' was nothing but rabble rousing at its basest form.

Our own worst enemy is ourselves. 'member Pogo? "I have met the enemy, and they is us"

Noone controls without consent. Why do you think bread and circusess are so popular. The monkey mass seeks to be controlled, and they choose the ones to pull the yoke their way.

To pick out the jews and ignore others is calumny of the lowest form, and the only conclusion I can make is not very nice, but precient in that I am aware of the history of these desires to slay mythical dragons.

[IcyPeaceMaker]

This explains the difference between Jews and Khazars:
http://www.rense.com/general47/facys.htm

[hairball]

I think you better find a more reliable source than Ben Freedman. He is the critter I was talking about. Believing him is like believing Clinton. If they speak, snakes come out of their mouths.

You really are going to have to do better than that in selling your brand of Kool-Aid.

[IcyPeaceMaker]

Try this and the links at the bottom:
http://www.jewsnotzionists.org/