Bradley in DC
02-13-2008, 08:02 AM
From the [DC4RonPaul] email list:
Gay groups file amicus brief on DC gun ban Supreme Court case
For those who are interested, here is a link to the amicus brief filed
on behalf of Pink Pistols and Gays & Lesbians for Individual Liberty in
the DC Second Amendment case now pending in the Supreme Court:
http://www.gurapossessky.com/news/parker/documents/07-290bsacPinkPistols.pdf
The main arguments are, first, that the need to possess a firearm for
self-defense is especially important for gays because in-home violence
and crime are especially great problems for gay people and, second,
that if the Second Amendment protects only a right to own a gun within
a militia (e.g., the National Guard) it is essentially a dead letter
for gays because they are excluded from service. There is no gay-
perspective brief on the other side.
[n.b., I do take issue with the "militia (e.g., the National Guard)" (http://www.law.ucla.edu/volokh/beararms/testimon.htm) comment]
]
Gay groups file amicus brief on DC gun ban Supreme Court case
For those who are interested, here is a link to the amicus brief filed
on behalf of Pink Pistols and Gays & Lesbians for Individual Liberty in
the DC Second Amendment case now pending in the Supreme Court:
http://www.gurapossessky.com/news/parker/documents/07-290bsacPinkPistols.pdf
The main arguments are, first, that the need to possess a firearm for
self-defense is especially important for gays because in-home violence
and crime are especially great problems for gay people and, second,
that if the Second Amendment protects only a right to own a gun within
a militia (e.g., the National Guard) it is essentially a dead letter
for gays because they are excluded from service. There is no gay-
perspective brief on the other side.
[n.b., I do take issue with the "militia (e.g., the National Guard)" (http://www.law.ucla.edu/volokh/beararms/testimon.htm) comment]
]