PDA

View Full Version : CNN Lady is giving victory to McCain



ord33
02-09-2008, 11:11 PM
What was that crap all about. Saying McCain won Washington and someone else said that a large percent was uncommitted. This is with 78% in and nobody has yet declared a winner.

Her name is Rachel Skylar from the Huffington Post
MozoVote
02-09-2008, 11:12 PM
McCain is probably *losing* Washington. These delegates can change their minds at the next convention. The Huck, Paul, Romney, and Uncommitted votes EASILY outpace McCain's results. They just need to agree on an alternative.
Ex Post Facto
02-09-2008, 11:13 PM
I feel like I'm living in a communist USSR, with this kind of reporting on TV.
Xyrus2
02-09-2008, 11:14 PM
We never really won the Cold War...we just kinda switched sides. :P

~X~
icon124
02-09-2008, 11:15 PM
She said something like McCain won and other got like 28%...Glad you gave me her name
Fields
02-09-2008, 11:16 PM
Fuck Rachel Sklar
ElectRonPaul2008
02-09-2008, 11:16 PM
What was that crap all about. Saying McCain won Washington and someone else said that a large percent was uncommitted. This is with 78% in and nobody has yet declared a winner.

Her name is Rachel Skylar from the Huffington Post

Rahil Shclar?
Fields
02-09-2008, 11:16 PM
The other guy David is actually voting for Ron Paul. He posted it on the National Review blog.
ceakins
02-09-2008, 11:17 PM
Local Seattle Media is on the band wagon also! Its time to take to the streets and follow news vans around and disrupt broadcasts.
RSLudlum
02-09-2008, 11:23 PM
The other guy David is actually voting for Ron Paul. He posted it on the National Review blog.


yeah, i loved it when David slapped that smirk off Sklar's face for her "other" got 28% comment!! He said i think that 28% was Ron Paul!! :D
coyote_sprit
02-09-2008, 11:30 PM
Rahil Shclar?

Rachel Sklar
Fields
02-09-2008, 11:35 PM
For Sklar being 35. I would.
rice_classic
02-09-2008, 11:37 PM
I was one of those "uncommitted" votes as I wanted to be nominated. I got nominated and NOW I am a delegate. Had I not listed myself as uncommitted I most like would not be a delegate for RP.

I think 70%+ of the uncommitted are RP supporters!
devil21
02-09-2008, 11:37 PM
For Sklar being 35. I would.

She's 35? Hmm, I was watching that segment and wondering to myself whether any of these HuffPost/Politico/TNR/etc "pundits" are over the age of 25? Seems like 3/4 of them look barely old enough to drink lol.
ord33
02-09-2008, 11:38 PM
For Sklar being 35. I would.

I'm certainly in agreement with that!
Fields
02-09-2008, 11:39 PM
She's 35? Hmm, I was watching that segment and wondering to myself whether any of these HuffPost/Politico/TNR/etc "pundits" are over the age of 25? Seems like 3/4 of them look barely old enough to drink lol.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rachel_Sklar
devil21
02-09-2008, 11:41 PM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rachel_Sklar

She looks kinda ugly in that pic actually. The miracle of make-up I guess.
coyote_sprit
02-09-2008, 11:43 PM
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rachel_Sklar

by my math she is 34.
kill the banks
02-09-2008, 11:45 PM
I was one of those "uncommitted" votes as I wanted to be nominated. I got nominated and NOW I am a delegate. Had I not listed myself as uncommitted I most like would not be a delegate for RP.

I think 70%+ of the uncommitted are RP supporters!

hmmm , anyone else here

kill the banks
Fields
02-09-2008, 11:46 PM
by my math she is 34.

Congrats on specifically doing the mathematics. Pat yourself of the back.
raiha
02-09-2008, 11:47 PM
I think 70%+ of the uncommitted are RP supporters!

I'm sorry I'm not American. This is gobbledegook to me! What on earth is going on here? Why would anyone have to write uncommitted if they are committed enough to be a delegate?
Whoever wrote the script clearly has a sense of humour.
What am i missing?
raiha
02-09-2008, 11:50 PM
I just read the explanation Rusty John gave on another thread. Its all too much for me all the same.