PDA

View Full Version : Spreadsheet coming with next result update.




Starks
02-09-2008, 08:47 PM
Called Wash GOP.

tbrambo
02-09-2008, 08:49 PM
When?

JK/SEA
02-09-2008, 08:54 PM
When?

7 pst

alionbe
02-09-2008, 08:59 PM
76% reporting now with mccain still in the lead?

http://www.intoxination.net/

not sure where theyre getting that

KevinDW78
02-09-2008, 09:00 PM
76% reporting now with mccain still in the lead?


Nobody is gonna have any results before the Washington GOP releases them - and they have only released 16%

alionbe
02-09-2008, 09:01 PM
right, that makes sense but I'm curious where they get 76%

JK/SEA
02-09-2008, 09:01 PM
76% reporting now with mccain still in the lead?

http://www.intoxination.net/

not sure where theyre getting that

They transposed the percentages. Click on Washington. Pop up gives you the correct % reporting........

stevedasbach
02-09-2008, 09:02 PM
76% reporting now with mccain still in the lead?

http://www.intoxination.net/

not sure where theyre getting that

76% is only for the Democrats. Republicans still at 16%.

TurtleBurger
02-09-2008, 09:02 PM
76% reporting now with mccain still in the lead?

http://www.intoxination.net/

not sure where theyre getting that

I think that might be the Democrat number. They put both races in the same row.

alionbe
02-09-2008, 09:03 PM
ah good call

Bigvick
02-09-2008, 09:03 PM
lol, they lied to you since its past 7:00 and no results..

morerocklesstalk
02-09-2008, 09:05 PM
lol, they lied to you since its past 7:00 and no results..

The results are hidden with the WMD's.

Starks
02-09-2008, 09:05 PM
The results are hidden with the WMD's.

Does that mean they don't exist?

morerocklesstalk
02-09-2008, 09:08 PM
Does that mean they don't exist?

Just because we did not find them doesnt mean they weren't there

- Mike Huckabee

morerocklesstalk
02-09-2008, 09:09 PM
Maybe you misheard them.

Are you sure they said "spreadsheet" and not "spread shit"? Because the latter seems correct as of right now.

Starks
02-09-2008, 09:10 PM
Just because we did not find them doesnt mean they weren't there

- Mike Huckabee

In all due fairness, he is technically correct. Doesn't make him any less of an idiot though.

Starks
02-09-2008, 09:11 PM
Maybe you misheard them.

Are you sure they said "spreadsheet" and not "spread shit"? Because the latter seems correct as of right now.

I lol'd. Hard.

TurtleBurger
02-09-2008, 09:11 PM
I lol'd. Hard.

+1

otero1
02-09-2008, 09:13 PM
+1+20

morerocklesstalk
02-09-2008, 09:15 PM
In all due fairness, he is technically correct. Doesn't make him any less of an idiot though.

I guess but you can apply that faulty logic to anything that is unobtainable.

It wouldn't hold up in any small court but some how it works for justification of a war.

Ronin
02-09-2008, 09:44 PM
In all due fairness, he is technically correct. Doesn't make him any less of an idiot though.

And in the next sentence he said they could have been moved to Jordan.

ord33
02-09-2008, 09:55 PM
And in the next sentence he said they could have been moved to Jordan.

Haha...I remember that. It was such a stupid comment even the media reporter was calling him out on it. Then a campaign spokesman for Huckabee was asked about it and spun it saying "well what he meant is they could be anywhere, he didnt mean specifically in Jordan". Well, the dumbass shouldnt have said Jordan then, he didnt qualify it by saying or anywhere else in the Mid-East if I recall correctly. I think that was a classic bafoon comment by Huckabee that nobody mentions.