CNN poll, Dr. Paul holds at 2%

[Bradley in DC]

http://i.a.cnn.net/cnn/2007/images/08/10/rel8d.pdf

8 -2- August 6-8, 2007

IF GINGRICH WERE NOT IN THE RACE
Aug. June May April March Jan.
6-8 22-24 4-6 10-12 9-11 19-21

Giuliani 29% 31% 25% 30% 38% 35%
F. Thompson 22% 21% 15% 12% N/A N/A
McCain 16% 19% 24% 24% 19% 27%
Romney 12% 11% 11% 10% 10% 8%
Brownback 3% 1% 2% 1% 2% 3%
Huckabee 3% 2% 3% 1% 2% 1%
Paul 2% 2% 1% 1% 2% 1%
Tancredo 2% 1% 2% 2% 1% 2%
T. Thompson 1% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1%
Hunter * * 2% * * 1%
No opinion 10% 10% 8% 13% 17% 16%

BASED ON 357 REGISTERED REPUBLICANS -- SAMPLING ERROR: +/- 5% PTS.

IF GINGRICH WERE IN THE RACE
Aug. June May Apr. Mar. Jan.
6-8 22-24 4-6 10-12 9-11 19-21
2007 2007 2007 2007 2007 2007

Giuliani 27% 30% 25% 27% 34% 32%
F. Thompson 19% 19% 13% 11% N/A N/A
McCain 14% 18% 23% 24% 18% 26%
Gingrich 12% 8% 9% 8% 9% 9%
Romney 11% 9% 10% 10% 9% 7%
Brownback 3% 1% 2% 1% 2% 2%
Huckabee 2% 2% 3% * 1% 1%
Tancredo 2% 1% 2% 1% 1% 1%
Paul 1% 2% 1% 1% 2% 1%
T. Thompson 1% 1% 1% 1% 1% 1%
Hunter * * 1% * * 1%
No opinion 8% 10% 8% 13% 17% 12%

(As I've said before and repeat now, most polls before Labor Day demonstrate name ID. Very few people know of Dr. Paul yet. We can change that. DONATE, DONATE, DONATE!)

[JosephTheLibertarian]

Don't Worry. Many Will Drop Out After Tomorrow So We Will Receive More Name Recognition

[disinter]

Don't Worry. Many Will Drop Out After Tomorrow So We Will Receive More Name Recognition

Worry about their bogus polls? I think they have been debunked enough that it is safe to laugh at them.

[disinter]

Of course they could be conditioning the public to accept the real election results Diebold will give us.