Ex Post Facto
02-08-2008, 05:26 PM
I've been seeing posts to Ron Paul newspaper online articles where everyone identifies themselves as being a Ron Paul support. I have seen some that don't identify who they support, address the issues, and give the impression that they are going to switch to Ron Paul as a result of the information provided by the newspaper.
I think it is more powerful when you can't be labeled a Ron Paul supported, as media has already marginalized us, to not directly associate yourself as an RP supporter. We need to do this in the workplace, at events, and everywhere when we hear something unconstitutional. Make RP's name a good name, said by average people.
So, instead of saying: "I'm an Ron Paul supporter." Say, "These journalistic practices of excluding certain candidates is not right. By doing so, you make people question what role journalist take in selecting the next president. This lends creditability to Ron Paul's platform."
Just a thought.
I think it is more powerful when you can't be labeled a Ron Paul supported, as media has already marginalized us, to not directly associate yourself as an RP supporter. We need to do this in the workplace, at events, and everywhere when we hear something unconstitutional. Make RP's name a good name, said by average people.
So, instead of saying: "I'm an Ron Paul supporter." Say, "These journalistic practices of excluding certain candidates is not right. By doing so, you make people question what role journalist take in selecting the next president. This lends creditability to Ron Paul's platform."
Just a thought.