Truth newspaper (one-time deal)

[MalcolmGandi]

http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showthread.php?t=114029
I need writers! pm me.

[LibertyOfOne]

What crap.

There is already, "The American Free Press". Why the need for another garbage paper that departs from reality?

[MalcolmGandi]

What's crap? The idea, or the information? If you take issue with the information, please state exactly what information you have a problem with. I'm only trying to publish things that are provable. This is, I believe, our best hope against the onslaught of totalitarianism.

[BuddyRey]

What crap.

There is already, "The American Free Press". Why the need for another garbage paper that departs from reality?

The American Free Press, in my opinion, isn't a very good example of what a good representative publication of the 9/11 Skeptics community should be. It's radically nationalistic, with some pretty unsavory racist and racialist backers.

Now might be a good time to plug my very favorite paper, the Idaho Observer!

http://www.proliberty.com/observer/

[LibertyOfOne]

What's crap? The idea, or the information? If you take issue with the information, please state exactly what information you have a problem with. I'm only trying to publish things that are provable. This is, I believe, our best hope against the onslaught of totalitarianism.

The information. I mean the origin of AIDS? That topic has been debunked over and over to the point of insanity.

[LibertyOfOne]

The American Free Press, in my opinion, isn't a very good example of what a good representative publication of the 9/11 Skeptics community should be. It's radically nationalistic, with some pretty unsavory racist and racialist backers.

Trust me I read it for the humor factor and not as a source of information lol.

[BuddyRey]

Trust me I read it for the humor factor and not as a source of information lol.

Yeah, but the same may not be true for all who approach it as a newcomer (not just to "conspiracy theory" topics, but to general police state and civil liberties news as well.) Anybody whose introduction to this stuff is replete with ads for Creativity Movement groups will probably be turned off quick, fast, and in a hurry.

[LibertyOfOne]

Yeah, but the same may not be true for all who approach it as a newcomer (not just to "conspiracy theory" topics, but to general police state and civil liberties news as well.) Anybody whose introduction to this stuff is replete with ads for Creativity Movement groups will probably be turned off quick, fast, and in a hurry.

Which is why I hate conspiracy theories because they get tied to the liberty movement in a way that discredits it.

[MalcolmGandi]

Listen, as I stated in the other post, I'm not attached to the AIDS thing, I'm not very knowledgeable on that particular subject. However, there is a wealth of information that is very much true and easily provable that is being subverted by the media. My intention is to produce a quick overview of what is going on with the current corporatocracy and to galvanize people into action. That is my only aganda here. I believe we can accomplish this if we work together. All this would require is roughly 20-40 advertisers per 100,000 copies. Once the rough draft is completed, it can be shown to local businesses and they can be asked for support. Let them know that it requires no commitment, and there will be many others advertising as well (many businesses will be reluctant to attach their name to this). Once you aquire a sufficient number of advertisers, inform all the previously contacted businesses that you have like 25 other businesses willing to advertise. As far as distribution, that can be done through meetup group volunteers.

[MalcolmGandi]

Which is why I hate conspiracy theories because they get tied to the liberty movement in a way that discredits it.

Are you one of those people who thinks the sun shines out of Bush's ass? Come on, dude, there are conspiracies. Enron, Savings and Loan, Iran-Contra, media vs. Ron Paul, the list goes on. Conspiracies are a part of life. Why is that so hard to accept? Jeez, people are so brainwashed.

[LibertyOfOne]

Are you one of those people who thinks the sun shines out of Bush's ass? Come on, dude, there are conspiracies. Enron, Savings and Loan, Iran-Contra, media vs. Ron Paul, the list goes on. Conspiracies are a part of life. Why is that so hard to accept? Jeez, people are so brainwashed.

There is a difference between conspiracy and conspiracy theory. One has hard evidence the other is based on speculation from sometimes anecdotal evidence, but the majority of the time results from misunderstanding of evidence or made up evidence. I must be "brainwashed" because I am more demanding of proof and not just mere anecdotal evidence. I'm sorry I don't buy everything I read.

[MalcolmGandi]

Well, good, I see we're on the same page here. Like I said, I'm not interested in publishing anything speculative or with insufficient evidence. People can reach their own conclusions on certain things, but there are some things that are easily proven, such as:

The Federal Reserve scam
The dangers of fluoride, vaccines, and aspartame
The lies leading up to war in Iraq
The encroachment of a police state
The government involvement in the drug trade
The imminent collapse of the dollar
The consolidation of mainstream media
The National ID Card

So that's really what I'd like to disseminate to the general public. Cost should be roughly 12 cents a paper. Cheap and effective.

[LibertyOfOne]

Fact: Ron Paul is not getting a proportional amount of representation in the media compared to the other candidates.

Conspiracy theory: It must be the CFR that is responsible.

Jumping from a fact to speculation without more than anecdotal evidence is conspiracy theory. You can prove that many people in the media have connections to the CFR, but nothing is brought to the table as to proving said members are colluding to disenfranchise Paul. You can prove that Ron is not getting covered like the others, but you can't prove that the CFR is the source. You can draw a correlation, but correlations are not proof being that causality is not addressed.

[MalcolmGandi]

bumpity