PDA

View Full Version : Caucuses good, primaries bad




JohnM
02-04-2008, 07:18 AM
Someone has probably already posted this, but I can't help noticing. . .

Primaries

New Hampshire --- 7.65%
Michigan------------ 6.27%
South Carolina ---- 3.62%
Florida --------------3.23%

Caucuses

Lousisiana --- Possible 1st place?
Maine -------- 18.69% - Possible 1st place in delegates
Nevada ------ 13.73%
Iowa --------- 9.96%

Dr Paul has done significantly better in caucuses than primaries all over the U.S. Even the best primary is not as good as the worst caucus.

What does this tell us?

Liberty_TN
02-04-2008, 07:20 AM
It makes me despise Diebold.

FreeTraveler
02-04-2008, 07:27 AM
It means that people who are committed to being active in the political process are more informed than people who get up, go to the polls, and pull a handle based on name recognition. No real news there.

ItsTime
02-04-2008, 07:37 AM
bingo


It means that people who are committed to being active in the political process are more informed than people who get up, go to the polls, and pull a handle based on name recognition. No real news there.

Lois
02-04-2008, 10:44 AM
Voter Fraud. :mad::mad::eek:

VoluntaryMan
02-04-2008, 11:09 AM
It means that the average primary voter is twice as stupid as the average caucus voter.