Good write-up from 'Time'

[Patriot]

Crowd-pleasing anti-war answers on Iraq will pump up web traffic and donations once again, lending him added significance in the nomination process. His tone was perhaps more academic than that of his opponents, but he remains undaunted by his long shot status. If the Republicans nominated a candidate based on who most moved the applause meter, Paul would be giving his acceptance speech next summer.

— Mark Halperin

http://www.time.com/time/specials/2007/article/0,28804,1649967_1649969_1649963,00.html

[alexlcameron]

Nice, wish they would mention that he had far less time than the other candidates to express his views..

[Patriot]

P.S. Digg it here:
http://www.digg.com/2008_us_elections/Grading_the_Republican_Debate

[nullvalu]

P.S. Digg it here:
http://www.digg.com/2008_us_elections/Grading_the_Republican_Debate

Yeah, how do the grade match up with how much time they spoke?