ArrestPoliticians
02-02-2008, 12:09 PM
So do NOT vote for the "lesser of two evils" should the general election not feature Ron Paul.
I always wondered why the democrats went out of their way to say that they would try to bring home all "combat" troops by X or Y date. Arent all troops "combat troops"? Were they just going to leave medics and cooks?
The answer: The democrats plan to not "referee a civil war(that we caused)", drop troops strength in Iraq to around 70,000 men and women holed up in our permanent bases for the purpose of "fighting terror"(if there is "terror" in Iraq, why do the democrats oppose the war? ). Obama alluded to this in one the the debates, making him the new biggest piece of shit candidate, and Senator Ben Cardin admitted it on Maryland's #1 Talk radio host Ron Smith(a RP supporter) when prodded.
This line of reasoning is lock-step with McCain's assertion that "as long as the troops arent dying, we can keep them there forever".
I always wondered why the democrats went out of their way to say that they would try to bring home all "combat" troops by X or Y date. Arent all troops "combat troops"? Were they just going to leave medics and cooks?
The answer: The democrats plan to not "referee a civil war(that we caused)", drop troops strength in Iraq to around 70,000 men and women holed up in our permanent bases for the purpose of "fighting terror"(if there is "terror" in Iraq, why do the democrats oppose the war? ). Obama alluded to this in one the the debates, making him the new biggest piece of shit candidate, and Senator Ben Cardin admitted it on Maryland's #1 Talk radio host Ron Smith(a RP supporter) when prodded.
This line of reasoning is lock-step with McCain's assertion that "as long as the troops arent dying, we can keep them there forever".