PDA

View Full Version : "Hate speech"...even if such censorship were a violation of First Amendment rights:




Ernest
02-02-2008, 10:15 AM
A Call to End Hate Speech
By Ariel Alexovich

The head of the country’s largest Latino civil rights organization called on CNN, MSNBC and Fox News to stop providing a forum for pundits who consistently disparage the documented and undocumented Hispanic immigrant population.

The group, the National Council of La Raza (meaning “the people”), also has asked Mike Huckabee to renounce the endorsement of Jim Gilchrist, a co-founder of the Minuteman Project, a private organization dedicated to preventing people from illegally crossing the U.S.-Mexico border.

Speaking at the National Press Club in Washington on Thursday, Janet Murguia, the N.C.L.R. president, said that anti-Latino remarks on the big three cable news networks are insulting not only to minorities but also to the greater American population.

“It’s personal, it’s intolerable, and it has to end,” she said.

Besides contacting network executives and the Huckabee campaign, the N.C.L.R. has created a Web site to illustrate how disparaging language negatively affects race relations in America.

She listed Glenn Beck, who sometimes appears as a commentator on CNN as well as hosts his own radio show, as one of the worst offenders. Last June, he suggested that America create an alternative energy source out of the bodies of illegal immigrants.

Such talk has serious consequences, Ms. Murguia said. She cited an F.B.I. report which showed a double-digit percentage rise in violence against Latinos since 2003. What’s more, these negative feelings towards Hispanics carries over into U.S. legislation.

“Very often they’re taking their issues straight from some of the hate groups that we just described here, so that actually these words that go out from the hate groups get turned into campaign strategies and political strategies,” said Cecilia Munoz, an N.C.L.R. vice president.

Other major “vigilantes” that need to be kept in check are CNN’s Lou Dobbs, and Fox’s Sean Hannity and Alan Colmes — and most of their guests.

Ms. Murguia didn’t directly endorse any candidate or, for that matter, any political party. However, she had kind words to say about John McCain, the arguable front-runner in the Republican race. Mr. McCain’s plan to handle immigration does not involve the deportation of all illegal immigrants.

“With his emergence as a leading Republican presidential primary contender, I do think that we’ll see this toned down,” Ms. Murguia said. “He has not bought into the demonization or the dehumanization of the undocumented. And, you know, we give him a lot of credit for that. He has stuck principally to that position.

Does it mean that we know everything he’s going to do in that area of reform? And I know he’s got his work cut out for him with a number of people, and we’ll see him put this whole platform together, but we do believe that if he ends up being in a lead role here, we think that that issue will be tapered down.

But it’s not just because of his views — we’re also seeing that it’s a strategy that is not winning for candidates who use it.”

With that she pointed to the single-issue, anti-immigration platform of Tom Tancredo, who withdrew from the Republican race in December. Mr. Tancredo, a congressman from Colorado, had created a particularly scary ad that portrayed Hispanic immigrants as dangerous criminals.

Ms. Murguia argued that hate speech should not be tolerated, even if such censorship were a violation of First Amendment rights:

Everyone knows there is a line sometimes that can be crossed when it comes to free speech. And when free speech transforms into hate speech, we’ve got to draw that line. And that’s what we’re doing here today. And we need to make sure that network executives will hold their people accountable and not cross that line.


http://thecaucus.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/02/01/a-call-to-end-hate-speech/

Truth Warrior
02-02-2008, 10:18 AM
Welcome to PC ( thought police ) world!

Ernest
02-02-2008, 10:59 AM
Welcome to PC ( thought police ) world!

Agreed!

However that is only half of it as this is directed specifically at white Americans & Western Culture.

Why exactly does LaRaza exist?

Ira Aten
02-02-2008, 11:04 AM
La Raza doesn't mean "the People".

It means" "The Race".

Thus, the damned word "Raza".

How long are these revisionist historians going to get away with changing fact to fiction?

Try looking up "The Plan of San Diego".

La Raza was the initial group of military operatives which Mexican President Carranza organized in 1915, to use the threat of a race war as a terrorist tactic to scare the border residents of Texas, and to force President Wilson to recognize the Carranza government as the official government of Mexico over his rivals.

A "La Raza" fellow named Basilio Ramos was caught in the Guerra store in Duval County Texas (drunked up and raising hell) by a guy named Paul Mayfield, who was a deputy sheriff in that county, and after taking Ramos to jail, they found he was carrying a copy of a document. The document, was a signed copy of the Plan of San Diego. Carranza knew that Wilson didn't want to face a war with Germany which was looming, and have another war with Mexico. Carranza didn't want Diaz to take over, and knew that if he could force Wilson to recognize Carranzaista government, he could crush Diaz.

So once again, a Macavillian plan to use people for cannon fodder ruled the day.

If you read the plan of San Diego carefully, you see the "La Raza" (meaning the RACE, which consisted of only Mexican Nationals who lived along the border on both sides of the Rio Grande) planned rising up on a certain date, and taking over the government of Texas, New Mexico, Calfornia, and Arizona by killing every Anglo male over the age of sixteen, and killing any Anglo male under sixteen who was found armed.

It was a very interesting time in Texas/Mexico history, and resulted in helping increase racial hatred, murder, and terroristic raids (from both sides of the border) for about twelve years.

A truly horrible time then. And if allowed to resurface again (which it seems to be) will produce, and is producing, similar results down on the border.

In those days, the smuggling across the border to fuel the fight was arms, and mescal.

These days, it is arms and drugs. The only difference is the technology, but the hatred "La Raza" creates, is still the same.