militant
08-05-2007, 06:42 PM
the main abcnews writeup on the debate contained 3 inaccurate statements on a single page. i have written them about this using their contact form at http://abcnews.go.com/Site/page?id=3052660
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Story?id=3447943&page=2
the above link contains inaccurate information. ron paul said he would *not* support an amendment, while you claim the contrary. the audio isn't too clear, but knowing how he says 'wouldn't' from other appearances, at the very least you should seek clarification from the campaign.
further, you called it 'scattered audience cheers' on his iraq exit statement, but the candidate received a loud reaction from the audience, and anyone with an ear can hear it was mostly positive.
additionally, ron paul did not author legislation to force the immediate withdrawal of our troops from iraq. he wrote legislation that would withdraw the congressional authorization for the use of force in iraq, and to require the president to seek new authorization to continue the war.
in the 4 page report, paul is only discussed on page 2, and in that single page are 3 inaccurate and uninformed claims about him.
i would ask you to issue a clear retraction and correction. this is a presidential race, and your credibility is on the line.
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Story?id=3447943&page=2
the above link contains inaccurate information. ron paul said he would *not* support an amendment, while you claim the contrary. the audio isn't too clear, but knowing how he says 'wouldn't' from other appearances, at the very least you should seek clarification from the campaign.
further, you called it 'scattered audience cheers' on his iraq exit statement, but the candidate received a loud reaction from the audience, and anyone with an ear can hear it was mostly positive.
additionally, ron paul did not author legislation to force the immediate withdrawal of our troops from iraq. he wrote legislation that would withdraw the congressional authorization for the use of force in iraq, and to require the president to seek new authorization to continue the war.
in the 4 page report, paul is only discussed on page 2, and in that single page are 3 inaccurate and uninformed claims about him.
i would ask you to issue a clear retraction and correction. this is a presidential race, and your credibility is on the line.