View Full Version : Ron Paul is UNSTOPPABLE!!
TheEvilDetector
08-05-2007, 11:39 AM
In high school I was taught the following formula:
Force = mass * acceleration
I guess that Ron Paul's mass roughly is 70kg
The acceleration is about 1000000000000000000000000000m/s^2
The Force of Ron Paul's message is greater than all the nukes combined!!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NKNaFGDuuUg
foofighter20x
08-05-2007, 11:47 AM
That'd be Newton's 2nd Law. ;)
SeanEdwards
08-05-2007, 11:49 AM
In high school I was taught the following formula:
Force = mass * acceleration
[/url]
It's not really surprising that a guy who embraces the controlled demolition theory for the WTC would also get a basic physical law of kinetic energy wrong.
It's:
E = 1/2 (mass) (velocity)^2
foofighter20x
08-05-2007, 11:51 AM
It's not really surprising that a guy who embraces the controlled demolition theory for the WTC would also get a basic physical law of kinetic energy wrong.
It's:
F = 1/2 (mass) (velocity)^2
No.
He's right. (http://www.glenbrook.k12.il.us/GBSSCI/PHYS/CLASS/newtlaws/u2l3a.html)
SeanEdwards
08-05-2007, 11:57 AM
No.
He's right. (http://www.glenbrook.k12.il.us/GBSSCI/PHYS/CLASS/newtlaws/u2l3a.html)
I don't think so... (http://www.glenbrook.k12.il.us/GBSSCI/PHYS/Class/energy/u5l1c.html)
foofighter20x
08-05-2007, 11:59 AM
I don't think so... (http://www.glenbrook.k12.il.us/GBSSCI/PHYS/Class/energy/u5l1c.html)
Um, no, he's right.
He's quoting Newton's second law, which is about FORCE.
You are quiting a formula about kinetic energy.
There's a difference. ;)
synapz
08-05-2007, 12:00 PM
I don't think so... (http://www.glenbrook.k12.il.us/GBSSCI/PHYS/Class/energy/u5l1c.html)
Sorry, Sean, Kinetic Energy is different than Force. Force = m*a, KE = 1/2*m*v^2
;)
TheEvilDetector
08-05-2007, 12:00 PM
F=ma
Sean do you know something Newton didnt?
How rude of me to let views of a hippie like Newton cloud your academic insights.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newton's_laws_of_motion
You have just revealed your utter ignorance for the whole forum, congratulations Sean.
spacebetween
08-05-2007, 12:01 PM
I don't think so... (http://www.glenbrook.k12.il.us/GBSSCI/PHYS/Class/energy/u5l1c.html)
Dude...
no.
Kinetic energy != force
ZandarKoad
08-05-2007, 12:05 PM
Dude...
no.
Kinetic energy != force
Oooh, an equal sign with an EXLAMATION POINT! Does that mean like, "Kinetic energy SO TOTALLY EQUALS force!"?
j/k :p
foofighter20x
08-05-2007, 12:06 PM
Kinetic energy ≠ force
Edit, just cause I like special characters ;)
spacebetween
08-05-2007, 12:06 PM
Oooh, an equal sign with an EXLAMATION POINT! Does that mean like, "Kinetic energy SO TOTALLY EQUALS force!"?
j/k :p
sure...
haha this topic has gone completely out the window.
But Ron Paul is unstoppable. It's possible we're just over-analyzing the debate. The simple fact of the matter is he didn't get enough time... as usual.
TheEvilDetector
08-05-2007, 12:07 PM
Oooh, an equal sign with an EXLAMATION POINT! Does that mean like, "Kinetic energy SO TOTALLY EQUALS force!"?
j/k :p
!= means not equal to
stevedasbach
08-05-2007, 12:11 PM
SeanEdward,
The Evil Detector quoted the formula F=ma. He's right -- this is Newton's Second Law of motion. The ^2 at the end of the acceleration was part of the units - m/s^2 (meters per second squared)
The formula you quoted was the correct formula for kinetic energy -- which is NOT the same as Force.
Your criticism of The Evil Detector was unjustified.
Steve Dasbach
Chemistry & Physics Teacher, HS & College, 24 years
SeanEdwards
08-05-2007, 12:12 PM
You have just revealed your utter ignorance for the whole forum, congratulations Sean.
Eh, whatever. You reveal your utter ignorance every damn day with your moonbat demolition theories.
TheEvilDetector
08-05-2007, 12:13 PM
Eh, whatever. You reveal your utter ignorance every damn day with your moonbat demolition theories.
Ok Sean. O.........K
foofighter20x
08-05-2007, 12:14 PM
Cut the personal attacks. I mean it.
Proving yourself correct is one thing. Rubbing it in is quite another. Knock it off.
Edit: Lets get this back on topic anyway.
I better see some Dr Paul talk or I'm locking this and moving it to the basement.
jjschless
08-05-2007, 12:15 PM
It's not really surprising that a guy who embraces the controlled demolition theory for the WTC would also get a basic physical law of kinetic energy wrong.
It's:
E = 1/2 (mass) (velocity)^2
Foot in Mouth.
Your hate for those with differing views has clouded your decision making ability. Hopefully you learn from this lesson.
LibertyOfOne
08-05-2007, 12:28 PM
The accurate way to calculate force would be the derivative of momentum with respect to time.
F= dP/dt
On the other hand if you have a static acceleration then F=M*A is fine.
Scribbler de Stebbing
08-05-2007, 12:33 PM
I wasn't arguing != doesn't mean <> . I reversed it. Never mind. It wasn't very funny.
TheEvilDetector
08-05-2007, 12:33 PM
The accurate way to calculate force would be the derivative of momentum with respect to time.
F= dP/dt
On the other hand if you have a static acceleration then F=M*A is fine.
I was just using a simple, valid and accepted formula to make a point about the popularity of RP's message, that's all.
this thread makes me laugh
Original_Intent
08-05-2007, 01:11 PM
OMG! It's a NERD PISSING CONTEST! Slide rules at the ready.....:D
foofighter20x
08-05-2007, 01:15 PM
OMG! It's a NERD PISSING CONTEST! Slide rules at the ready.....:D
Wait!
I need my pocket protector. :p
LibertyOfOne
08-05-2007, 01:22 PM
It's all about the pentiums baby!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2vaNeaWQoHI
EastWindRain
08-05-2007, 01:36 PM
It's not really surprising that a guy who embraces the controlled demolition theory for the WTC would also get a basic physical law of kinetic energy wrong.
It's:
E = 1/2 (mass) (velocity)^2
How is this productive? Again it only serves to divide and conquer Ron Paul supporters.
Scribbler de Stebbing
08-05-2007, 01:38 PM
!= means not equal to
You were mistaking "!=" for "=!" Had he said "kinetic energy =! force" he would have meant kinetic energy pwns force.
Okay, special character gurus, how do I do the energy symbol? @ except with the "e."
foofighter20x
08-05-2007, 01:43 PM
You were mistaking "!=" for "=!" Had he said "kinetic energy =! force" he would have meant kinetic energy pwns force.
Okay, special character gurus, how do I do the energy symbol? @ except with the "e."
I've never seen that one...
ə
♫♂♣♦♥♠♀
TheEvilDetector
08-05-2007, 03:03 PM
You were mistaking "!=" for "=!" Had he said "kinetic energy =! force" he would have meant kinetic energy pwns force.
Okay, special character gurus, how do I do the energy symbol? @ except with the "e."
spacebetween said:
kinetic energy != force
!= means not equal to
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.3 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.